To: K-list
Recieved: 2004/02/26 05:03
Subject: [K-list] Pure Drivel
From: Lobster
On 2004/02/26 05:03, Lobster posted thus to the K-list:
> Perhaps all his lovers were willing... :)
Dear K-Men,
Love has little to do with the will
(something Crowley never understood either)
The Divine Will is Love (that is the connection)
Our will is just that (partial and separate and disharmonious
- and that is just me)
So 'Do what thou wilt' etc - is a misunderstanding
of an earlier Dervish dictum and is not about
personal freedom
It is about sacrificing the will
the ego and the 'I serve goddess through me' mentality
(for example - super goddess/k teacher
will fullness)
>>Dervishes also have a habit of talking
>>of internal states in terms of
>>intoxication (advocating illegal wine drinking)
>>slavery (advocating repression)
>>and so on . . .
>
> My own work is sometimes similarly misinterpreted. ;)
Not at all - I think your 'work'
is very well represented (by you and your familiars)
as an extension of your ego.
When will you be worthy of
Divine representation?
> What do you believe?
I believe I have no need for beliefs.
>>> and at any level, true compliments can be delicious. They can be
>>> pleasant even if they are not true, o wise humble beautiful enlightened
>>> Lobster.
>>
>>Only to the egoic.
>>I have no interest either way.
>
> True compliments are a spontaneous love offering... but often when
> complimented, I wonder what the speaker is wanting from me.
> Flattery=manipulation.
You are very easy to manipulate
because you set yourself up.
The ego is a very weak construction
no matter how inflated.
What we (if able) offer is what
is of best use to the person
and situation.
For example on the $ it says:
'In Goddess we Trust'
(something like that)
Now - who buys that?
Everything has a price
and that is why Love is not a thing
thing.
>>The question is really of where one is coming from
>>inflated sense of self
>>or inflated capacity to serve (other than oneself)
>
> Where are you coming from?
I'm not.
For example offering a questioning of self
when I am questionable
- and I am most definitely questionable . . .
Most of all I do not learn cheap tricks
and misuse them.
I find expansive truths and
give them away
>I don't get the focus of these postings. I just joined and asked the
>moderator a question specific to my case/interests for Kundalini but
>haven't heard back. So far, to be honest, I'm just seeing a lot of
>disjunctive (if occasionally intriguing) ramblings. I suppose that's
>better than single-minded spiritual purity! Dangerous...
>
>Noel K.
You are lucky you have not heard
back
That too is an answer.
What you call focus
I call rambling
And what you think pure
I consider drivel
Now Noel K
what are you really like?
Dangerous (to yourself)?
Or safe?
Like me
LOL
Think of me as a mirror
Now what is your best reflection?
:-)
>In the mean time, if you are not shy, feel free to ask your question of the
>list. There are a number of very knowledgeable people here!
Why are they still lurking after
all this time?
Here is somewhere new to lurk Proj Exo
ProjeX tmXxine
http://www.cyber-shaktipat.org/relax/projex/
;-)
Lobster Danger
PS. Be kind to me
(I don't deserve it - but you do)
What Happens when you cross a Sufi with a Buddha?
LOVE BUDDHA
http://tooting.webspace.fish.co.uk/love/
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.