To: K-list
Recieved: 2004/02/17 19:45
Subject: FW: Re: [K-list] Humbled forwarded from morgan
From: l p
On 2004/02/17 19:45, l p posted thus to the K-list:
>From: Morgan Kochel <areswolfATmac.com>
>To K-List:
>
>Since some of you have made me aware that "Mystress" is still reacting to
>me even when I'm off the list, I thought I'd pop in and clarify a few
>things.
>
>Mystress, you may want to consider there being other interepretations to
>the first conclusions you so readily jump to...
>
>> My comment about your asking for help more often than you offer it,
>>triggered this issue in you, big time...but it is your issue.
>
>You say that your comment "triggered" something in me. I say that, if
>anything, it triggered a natural "dislike" for someone attempting to
>belittle another by making them feel guilty about asking help. I'm not too
>impressed with your "loving tough-bitch" persona, either. It is common for
>folks on their "high and mighty" to play such word games and projections
>with those they perceive "below them" in order to maintain their perceived
>control. Since I have never seen even a modicum of humility from you on
>this list, I can say with some assurance that you have fallen into a HUGE
>ego trip with this list. Particularly since you write such lengthy letters
>to me once you know I've unsubbed.
>
>Sadly, there are some here who are following you right along, but as you
>say on your website, those people who just LOVE you to torture them give
>you something quite special. It's a hard ego-trip/addiction to break.
>
>> My comment was really related to something a little bit different...
>>Your not reading the list guidelines is disrespectful of the community.
>>Your complaints about the reply-to "hassle" are an effort to control, and
>>show ingratitude to the list moderators, and those who have helped you.
>>"Resentment of debt."
>
>It seems to me that you blew my little comments WAY out of proporation.
>While I admit I was the only one vocal about this list's inefficiencies as
>compared to other lists out there, it was only done tongue-in-cheek, and
>then only to demonstrate my awareness of some irritability issues I was
>going through at the time. YOU chose to take offense to it and turn it
>into some imagined power play.
>
>I wouldn't DREAM of attempting to make you change your list, Mystress, and
>I certainly wouldn't DREAM of ever writing to you privately again since
>this issue is so sensitive for you. My bad, and I apologize.
>
><snip of long intellectual explanation of chakras>
>
>> Intellectual knowing is part of ego, it is prideful.
>
>Agreed. :-)
>
>> An ego that believes itself to be a "spiritual person" is still an
>>ego... and it can be worse, because with that ego the shadow side is more
>>deeply repressed than in an average person.
>
>Hm. Would you say, then, that someone who calls themselves "Mystress",
>"kundalini-awakened", and who continually attempt to "teach" others without
>ever admitting their own human foibles to be expressing more spirit or more
>ego? It seems to me that *you* got upset here, and getting upset comes
>from not getting one's way. Ego.
>
>> The "spiritual person" is unaware of what the shadow is up to, and to
>>maintain the self image, they project their negative perceptions onto
>>others... while managing not to notice their own controlling, abusive
>>behavior... or going even farther, and blaming others for how they feel
>>and react.
>
>Ah. You're behavior is making more sense now. Thanks for the
>clarification.
>
>> Nobody but you and Goddess can control how you choose to react to
>>anything. Blaming others for your reactions, is a vampiric power game, of
>>the power chakra.
>
>So, by my suggesting an incredibly small change to the list, only to meet
>with an email tirade from you, and now this defensive one to the list, it
>means you're engaged in vampirism? Really, I don't think you should be so
>hard on yourself. A simple apology would do -- and then we can all get
>back to being *real people* here, as opposed to comic-book characters.
>
>> I'm not angry, or superior. I write from the Witness state, which is
>>devoid of emotion, but also very honest and direct. Telling it like it is.
>>From the witness, there are no boundaries, no sense of self... no ego. It
>>is a state of unconditional love... and to be in it, feels like nothing.
>>Peace, only. Unconditional love it unemotional, emotions would be a
>>*condition.*
>
>You have shown time and time again on this list that you do, indeed, still
>have an ego. Snide remarks (and I have several examples from your last
>email) do not come from a place of "the Witchess state". (How many people
>here are snowed by this?) For example:
>
>> I do have a talent for control and manipulation, of course! I was a
>>professional dominatrix for many years, earning my living from using the
>>talent, consensually.
>
>What part of you needs to continually remind others about this, via this
>e-list, your attitude, your constant reminders, and an entire website with
>(fergodsakes) videos of yourself dressed in leather spouting attitude to
>the camera?? If we are all One, why do you believe you're so special?
>
>> I also have discernment in application... and a clear cut knowledge of
>>limits. I can tell you from enormous experience, exactly how much power I
>>have, to control how another person will think, react or feel:
>>
>> NONE AT ALL.
>
>Have you dealt with the heart chakra lately? Control over others isn't
>anything to be proud of. We are all equal. We are all One. The need to
>control comes from the fear of not being in control.
>
>And to those who believe they need control -- relax. Your Divine Soul is
>within, not in any "mystress". Don't be afraid to take control of your
>life. No one but you can tell you what you need, where you are in life,
>and where you need to go. Others can sometimes point the way, but NEVER
>look at another person as your god. Doing so affirms the Me/Them
>dichotomy, and that is exactly what the Journey to Divine is about
>awakening from!
>
>> Not unless they allow it, and even then the responses can be
>>unpredictable. Therefore I have no expectations of control. Similarly, I
>>know that someone blaming me for how they feel, is illusion, a power game
>>of victimhood. What they describe is impossible. Free Will is Goddess Law.
>>
>> Morgan, yes, you are controlling and manipulative, and if you like I
>>will support you, by going though your last post, line by line and naming
>>each control drama you used.
>
>I never denied that I can be controlling and manipulative, so it would be
>rather pointless. You are not my teacher. I came to this list to meet
>others going through Kundalini awakenings, and I have met quite a few
>helpful, intelligent people here. You, on the other hand, seems to have
>assumed that I want your constant criticism in my life. I'm not a
>submissive, and if you can't deal with that, I'll go elsewhere.
>
>> My offer, is based in *compassion.*
>
>Compassion is given with love, not accusations or unasked-for judgments.
>You see anger when you read my emails, though I sit here with a smile on my
>face, laughing at the absurdity of arguing with myself! Mystress, drop the
>shield and come down here with us mere humans!
>
>> You know, I see my younger self, in you... it moves me to compassion,
>>not anger. Namaste, love.
>
>LOL!! That's just proof of the Cosmic Mirror. I see you the same way!
>LOL!
>
>> I know, most likely you have read this with a prickly attitude of
>>anger at my apparent confidence in my diagnosis of you. Your fear and
>>prejudice of my sexual orientation gets your back up with that "I'm not
>>your submissive" crap... I have not invited you to be my sub, it is an
>>honor rarely given. It is your stuff, your fear... it is not what I'm
>>about. I already have more people asking to be my sub than there are hours
>>in a day, and I certainly would not want to deal with such a difficult one
>>as you would be.
>
>My gawd, Mystress, your "assessment" couldn't be farther from the truth.
>In the 1970's and 1980's, living in California as a young legal secretary
>in the Bay Area with the wildest night life you can imagine, there's little
>if anything you could shock me with. I walked in Gay Pride Parades and
>worked in AIDS clinics, and before that slept with every rock star that
>came through Oakland Stadium, and you say you KNOW ME and that I'm
>"prejudiced" against your little leather-power game? It's all a GAME,
>woman! If you need so badly to win, YOU WIN, okay? LOL.
>
>Nope, no ego in Mystress' above paragraph at all. Nope, uh-uh. LOL! Let
>me know when I start to feel the prickly attitude you say I'm feeling,
>because at the moment my heart is aching for you! And I'm really hoping
>that the comment about how many are subbing to your list is not in reaction
>to how many people are writing to me offlist to tell me they're leaving!
>Oh, my. *chuckle*
>
>> Truth is, I do know your spiritual progress better than you do. You do
>>not even know that your current stuff is all power chakra related.
>
>My crown is tingling, my heart is warm and wanting to reach out to you, and
>I'm laughing hysterically. I like this power chakra! LOL!
>
>> I do not seek unquestioning obedience, from anyone. Not even my
>>slaves. I encourage discussion.
>
>As long as you agree with it.
>
>Mystress, I don't know how we'll ever get beyond this point. I will never
>accept your supposed omniscience. Not you, or anyone else, will ever know
>me better than myself. You will NEVER know anyone on this list better than
>they know themselves.
>
>Every great guru from Jesus to Buddha to Krishna had humility, and it was
>that humility that was seen as a strength by their students. That is what
>you're missing, and until you learn to develop it, you will only attract
>those who support your goddess-game and no real work will get done. Come
>down to earth, and we can all hold hands and experience the Joy of
>Kundalini the way it was given to us.
>
>And despite it all, I knew *exactly* what you were trying to do with your
>dominatrix thing -- and I think it's a great idea! But there are pitfalls,
>and you may have found one.
>
>
>Namaste,
>Morgan
>
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2004/k20040384.html
|