To: K-list
Recieved: 2004/02/14 23:15
Subject: Re: [K-list] Re: The "TO" Hassle
From: K-list owner
On 2004/02/14 23:15, K-list owner posted thus to the K-list:
At 09:02 AM 14/02/2004, DruoutATaol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 2/14/2004 7:55:09 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>areswolfATmac.com writes:
>This was in response to an email I sent some time ago when some of us
>on the list were asking if the owner could change the "TO" function so
>we could all just hit reply to our emails and have it go to the list.
>
>Dear Morgan,
>
>We tend to get a bit cranky when this subject comes up for the hundreth time!
Actually, my post wasn't cranky. That Morgan read it that way, has more
to do with her than me. Her private response was... well... heh. Funny and
kind of sad.
>Many list members would be delighted to get a private note from
>Mystress--even a critical one! LOL!
thanks...
> But as for asking questions, of course there is no
>limit. Ask away! You are also encouraged to offer constructive feedback to
>others on the list. You seem to be very together.
I did not suggest she should not ask questions. She has said she
sometimes does not bother to post because changing the address is too much
hassle. I only observed that but apparently it is no issue if she is in
need. I find that interesting...
She implied that we are missing out on her useful advice because the
reply function is so troublesome. Apparently we are, because I have not
seen any posted... ;)
>I don't want to post the entire email here as it's rather negative,
Not because posting private mail is contrary to the list guidelines?
Heh... you did not read the list guidelines... That would be too much hassle?
You have my permission to post it, and we can take a poll about whether
it is negative... :)
Post your response to me as well, and we can do another poll... the one
you request, below... ;)
Morgan wrote:
>but
>I do want to check with the rest of the list to ask if the above
>assessment is correct. If the rest of you feel I'm asking too much in
>the way of help and not offering enough help to others, please let me
>know. I wasn't aware that there was a limit as to how much help could
>be asked for here.
There is no limit... the list has always been intended as a resource.
I observe you use the resource when in need, and then complain about
the minimal effort required to change the address in order to do so. Your
"help" to others consists of what you appear to think of as "constructive"
feedback, but is really only a silly criticism about the list setup, that
we have been over too many times already.
As Hillary mentioned, the answer to your comment is in the list
guidelines ... that you have not bothered to read.
I also commented that the list Shakti field sometimes causes people
(newbies) exaggerated emotional reactions... and no, I was not referring to
myself. I'm used to it... a source of it... and very tolerant of how people
behave when poked by it.
If you want additional feedback... you worry a lot, and second guess
the people who offer you advice. It is pretty normal for newbies to be
frightened of the process, so that is OK. You are self centered... I'm fine
with that, it is human... but the fear and scarcity that exaggerates your
self centeredness also causes you to try to control your environment, and
you see anger, threats and negativity where they do not exist.
That must be a pretty tough way to live, yoikes. The Shakti field is
poking on these issues, Goddess asking "Are you tired of this yet? Would
you like to let it go?" Offering the option for surrender and healing. if
you choose to cling to it instead, then Shakti will poke harder until you
choose to surrender.
Ya know, Morgan... diagnosing people's karmic issues and reflecting
them back so they can see and have an option to change, is my gift... how I
earn my daily bread. I'm really, really good at it. Sometimes people find
it scary that they are so transparent to me.
I mostly do it, from the Witness state... a place that is completely
devoid of emotions... and the resulting feedback tends to be really direct.
Sometimes the directness is interpreted differently by the recipients, but
I do not concern myself with things I have no control over.
Sometimes I observe stuff in the witness state that I find quite funny
when back in the body...
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.