To: K-list
Recieved: 2003/09/30 15:17
Subject: Philosophical question
From: elargonauto
On 2003/09/30 15:17, elargonauto posted thus to the K-list:
>That is not what Elargonauto is saying because he finds it imperative
>to not have a limitation of freedom, unless of course he thought of
>freedom as being completely devoted to something higher than yourself
>(which he will probably say now) ;>
Nope. MAS and me have completely different styles while speaking
about the same thing. I don´t use the word "surrender" I like to use the
word "letting go" or "non-doing". I don´t see myself as I "let go" to be
surrendering to a higher power, I just see it as being myself. I understand
that when you do this you stop acting from the head and use all your
potentials to find the best path in life ( included your head, of course).
Through this you become whole. And becasue the average human is split and
living far away from their real potentials there is a great difference. For
me there is nothing mystic here it is all about reality and regain your
healthy natural state that eveyone has by birthright.
Chao!
elargonauto.
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2004/k20040005.html
|