To: K-list
Recieved: 2003/04/28 15:10
Subject: Re: [K-list] Is there an atheist on the list?!?
From: J. Bradley
On 2003/04/28 15:10, J. Bradley posted thus to the K-list:
> From: "mundane zen" <gutrek AT_NOSPAM hotmail.com>
> To: K-list AT_NOSPAM kundalini-gateway.org
> Subject: Re: [K-list] Is there an atheist on the list?!?
> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 12:00:12 -0400
>
> K. is a tengible energy, which can be fit into the matrix of many belief
> systems. Christians may call it the Holy Spirit, Yogis call it Kundalini,
> Buddhists may call it the void... They're all just symbols.
This component really fascinates me; it does seem to be known across all
belief systems, and the caduceus (sp?) or a similar symbol also pops up all
over the place. In a roundabout way, this supports my growing belief that K
is part of human DNA, whether anomalous or not, I don't know.
> >... please don't yell at me because I don't have your beliefs!
>
>
> Is someone here doing that?
Not at all, and I should have said that ... I guess I'm a little raw from
the experience I'm currently having with my best friend. The day before
yesterday we almost got into an argument -- I backed off and just started
uh-uh'ing. When someone 'knows' god exists (or whatever one calls it), then
that often leaves no room for another's belief; I think 'knowing' gives the
person the sense that it's more than belief, that it's absolute
reality/fact. She has a very strong personality and I don't like to argue
with her when she's decided something -- makes for looping and seems
pointless to me. Deliberately opening myself to aggravation doesn't make
sense. Then there's my brother, an on-and-off-again Jehovah's Witness. To
be honest, I mostly avoid him when he's an active member. I don't know, I
must have a higher-than-'normal' guilt quotient. When my friend says she
knows there's an intelligent, loving force separate from us, existing around
and outside our planet -- ruling the universe, is how I interpret what she's
saying -- and I don't feel that at all, I really don't ... well, it's too
easy for me to feel 'wrong'. That's just all the years of abuse fallout and
shame/guilt I carried ... something about not feeling valid I suppose.
Still have that a bit around people I love dearly who happen to have less
trouble asserting their beliefs with me. *laughs* Probably I'll always
react this way; my effort to keep the peace, to avoid the feeling of having
disappointed someone with my wayward thinking. *smiles* I'm all about --
hey, it's -your- proof, it's not mine and, in my opinion, it's not proof ...
it's belief (hence the tendency to circular argument), but she -knows- I'm
wrong. Meh, why bother to argue. *smiles*
> You are not alone (wasn't that a movie?). I'm pretty comfortable using
> whatever terms the other person likes, as long as they don't start
treating
> their symbols as the exclusive and ultimate reality.
Yeah, that's the problem ... when others know they're right. *smiles*
> Someone on the list turned me on to David Bohm and his book "Wholeness and
> the Implicate Order". I bet you'd like it.
Thanks ... there are so many books out there, it helps to get suggestions
from people, makes it easier to know what to look at. ... I just did a
search on Google, using the title of the book and his name. I found some
very interesting stuff; I'm thinking perhaps David Bohm experienced the K
energy. He talks about different spin directions and sensations in his body
... I'll be reading more of his stuff. Thanks for pointing me in this
direction!
> Collective Unconscious -- the repositary of all the religious, spiritual,
> and mythological symbols and experiences of mankind.
Yes, I had it wrong. The person who developed the therapy I practice talks
about nonconscious, as opposed to un- or subconscious, for the very reason
it all gets mired down in who's theory says what sort of stuff. I much
prefer nonconscious, as the implication is much clearer -- it's that part
where active thought isn't happening. I started calling it the 'universal
database' after I began experiencing an increase in intuition, after I
started 'knowing' things (haha -- non-spiritual things, that is ... hrm,
maybe I'm tripping myself here? *laughs*) ... anyways, things that I knew
there was no way I -could- know, based on my own knowledge base. At one
point, I realized I 'knew' stuff about electrons, about plasma -- and I
didn't have a physics background to speak of, just highschool physics and a
couple months of a university science course that was geared to arts
students. So when it occurred to me, entirely out of nowhere, that plasma
was a good thing to use as an energy source ... I'm thinking, ok, I've lost
my mind and now I have delusions of intelligence. *laughs* And a month
later, there it was on the cover of one of the popular science magazines.
My right brain had taken the helm, it would seem; it's taken quite a lot of
thought and effort to convince myself it's ok to have these experiences.
After this, I became really interested in physics and, to a lesser degree,
relativity theory. It's been difficult, trying to understand some of the
concepts -- not having a strong science background and trying to wade
through some of that stuff! -- but I get that I understand a lot of it on an
intuitive level. Lately, I've come across things like quantum
decoherence -- which makes perfect sense to me. Anyways, I love the journey
of discovery and if I'm downloading stuff from the universal database, well,
all the better. *laughs*
> >(or whatever he called it; it's been years); I believe that what goes
> >around, comes around,
>
> Karma
Or, put another way, action at a distance and decoherence combine to remind
you of what you'd been up to ... or something. *laughs*
Jude
To get a reminder of your password or adjust your subscription, visit:
http://kundalini-gateway.org/mailman/listinfo/k-list_kundalini-gateway.org
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2003b/k2003b2168.html
|