To: K-list
Recieved: 2003/02/11 20:33
Subject: Re: [k-list] jlb's projections.
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent
On 2003/02/11 20:33, Mystress Angelique Serpent posted thus to the K-list:
> and I am asking you what you meant by it. What you have written so far
does not clarify much.
At 11:21 AM 11/02/03, jlb wrote:
>I think this is a cruel flame. To go with the "jlb" projections. But
>that's ok too.
It is not meant cruelly. Well.. the subject header was pretty cynical, but the thread was no longer about claustrophobia and that was the first thing that came to mind.
I still do not grok what was going on in your head, and what inspired you to invoke my name in your post. I just don't get it. Duh, me stupido maybe.
My interpretation of the archtypes you mentioned is quite different from yours. I do have an understanding of what Charles' vampire grrl did to invoke those reactions in him, but her actions do not meet my approval. She is young and stupid, to be messing around like that. I was similarly young and stupid, once. ;)
I interpreted your statements as classifying Me, Goddess and pro-domination as all an occult non consensual vampire games such as Charles' vampire was getting up to. No Witness there, it seemed obvious.
I get the same cold cold reaction when someone is feeding on my energy more than my body can keep up with... I do allow some people to use me as a channel, on the condition that they connect on a higher self level, not to my body's life force. Not often, I prefer they connect to Goddess within themselves instead of leaning on me... but it is part of some structures, like the grounding site, and happens autopilot via empathy.
I do get that you did not mean it the way it sounded to me... and I have realized that I am PMSing, highly hormonal, more sensitive and reactive than usual. I had not realized that, at the time. When I realize, I adjust. Sorry for my over reaction.
>I have an idea that it did clarify it much. This list isn't for wimps. If
>mirrors scare anyone, they won't like it here. lol (Acrua; if you are
>still looking)
Naw, she left, after her second over dramatic exit speech. My impression of her, is that she is spiritually awakened, but not kundalini awakened. That is why she so missed the point of the surrender imperative, mistook it for religion. Understanding comes of experience.
>Ok.. I admit it .. I'm out of my league here. I choose to be more careful.
When invoking my name as an example, at least... ;)
>>> A rather common prejudice... old news, an easy weapon. If you do not
>share it, then why mention it?
>
>I guess it was what i "see'd" and didn't think. :-)
Well, I agree with what Ken had to say about your comments, tho his reaction was stronger than mine. The list got hacked because the troll was a psycho who was not receiving the worship he felt was his due... not even hacked, exactly. His seizing on some common prejudices to use as a weapon does not make them valid. He decided Hillary was a hooker too, as I recall... heh. Not likely!
I also know that suddenly feeling my laser eyed scrutiny is enough to knock many people off balance, make them stutter and become erroneously defensive. No big.
>Still wondering mydamnself. And nope.. Mama Bear aint it either..
Perhaps the error is in thinking there is a gender specific archetype, and attempting to classify by possibly outdated sex roles. No big difference between a king and a queen, a male warrior or a female one.
>"Hell hath no fury like the woman scorned" Oh, but that's a different
>problem. :-)
Heh...
>>>So? We should see and not think. ? Is that a better idea.?
>> Yes! :) If you are speaking of spiritual observation...
>
>This spiritual observation concept, is in my humble opinion, maybe the
>"reason" for this whole thread. The synchronicity of it all. It has me
>thinking deeper anyway.
It is an interesting topic. The Witness is not infallible, as the information still gets passed through the unconscious mind of the vessel, but it does bypass the ego interpretations to a large extent.
>So why should you be "understood" when nobody else gets to be. :-)
I am pretty accustomed to being misunderstood, actually. Usually I just shrug at it. Except when my hormones make me hypersensitive and half blind.
> If we
>had it all figured out, maybe we wouldn't even be here on this list. I
>meant no dis-respect though. I'm sorry for that misunderstanding. But if
>I flattered you, you'd probably hate that too.. and flame me for that.
Cool, sorry for over reacting. If you flattered me I'd probably ignore it, or wonder what you were trying to gain from it. I'm kind of cynical, that way. An ethical dom does not take flattery too seriously, a swelled head interferes with discernment... enjoyable tho it may be.
>Insightful yes.. but I don't always agree.
You don't have to agree...
>> I'm nothing, so there is nothing to say?
>
>No. You are an enigma. An unfinished work. :-)
Well, there ya go. Enigmas are often misunderstood. Glad to be unfinished... a work in progress till the day I depart this mortal coil... and perhaps even after that.
>But Mystress Angelique Serpent is exaclty 24 letters.. thats cool !
>So you can expect something eventually.
My middle name is Fire.
A. F. Serpent. My Stress. LOL!!
It amuses me. Thanks for the tolerance. Blessings!
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2003b/k2003b0947.html
|