To: K-list
Recieved: 2003/02/11 04:26
Subject: [k-list] jlb's projections.
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent
On 2003/02/11 04:26, Mystress Angelique Serpent posted thus to the K-list:
At 06:55 PM 10/02/03, jlb wrote:
>Why? so you can beat me up?
Are you inviting me to? It appears you have thrown out these statements as a deliberate effort to provoke me. Asking for a spanking from Mystress?
Why class me along with Charles' vampire friend? Why label my activities as "Occult" or "Religion"? You have thrown out some accusations/projections that appear to have zero to do with me. Take them back or explain them.
You wrote:
>Very Interesting post... playing with these energies... and this perceived connection with kundalini / occult / religion / spirituality / sexuality etc..
>
>She sounds like an exiting sexy little bitch. :-)
>
>It's all a part of it. And it is seductive. Don't feel guilty about that.. imo.
>What do you think that Pro-Dom, Mystress, Goddess, is all about?
>I think this k-list has helped me to see it all with a more spiritual observation.
I ask you for clarification, and I do not get spiritual observation, you give me speculations based on books you have read. Projections.
>Warrior / ? Pro-Dom ? (brutal, ravishing,soldier/prostitute)
Why do you equate pro-domination with prostitution? It is not. Why do you equate the warrior with prostitution or ravishing brutality?
A more obvious comparison would be the Amazon archetype, the female warrior. Nor would I consider the warrior archetype to automatically be brutal or ravishing. It can be a noble ethic, Beastmaster and Samurai. Chivalry and the hero's journey Campbell spoke of.. the journey inward. "Way of the Peaceful Warrior" by Dan Millman.
>Obviously lots of room for conjecture here... maybe someone should write a book. :-)
That is exactly what it is, conjecture. Word games. What does that have to do with spiritual observation? Thinking is not 'seeing'.
>At the same time I was studying this, I was also into some mind-bending eneagram stuff.. so I put these models.. both genders, onto and an eneagram graphic. It was an interesting study for me.
Study is not spiritual observation either.
>sooo.. that's what it is "all" about. *big cheezy grin*
>
>* i * think !?
If you are able, I invite you to take a *genuine* spiritual observation of me. Based on what you appear to think "spiritual observation" is, I doubt you are able to do so... none of what you write has the clarity of the "Witness" state... but you are invited to try.
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2003b/k2003b0926.html
|