To: K-list
Recieved: 2003/02/08 15:06
Subject: Re: [k-list] clarity (more OFF-TOPIC, Re: guidelines)
From: percyval
On 2003/02/08 15:06, percyval posted thus to the K-list:
----- Original Message -----
From: <Shellelr AT_NOSPAM aol.com>
> when I forwarded the Bushisms poem. I actually didn't send it as
> political commentary, but because I thought it
> funnily absurd and strangely beautiful in a K-poem kind of way.
hi Shelle,
i guess it's subjective to a degree, but i see this as stretching things to
a point where any spam could be spamish in a k-spam kind of way... i don't
think this should be considered within the guidelines, even with such an
explanation...
> It seems
> that a handful of people saw that about it, too, which is why they
responded.
i really doubt that anyone (except possibly Bozzi... *grin*) saw it that
way... i just think they felt like responding to it...
warmly,
percyval
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2003b/k2003b0813.html
|