To: K-list
Recieved: 2002/10/31 07:37
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [K-list] Re: M e's post and ego]
From: Evening0star
On 2002/10/31 07:37, Evening0star posted thus to the K-list: Thank you for your response. That's good to know. But, no, it is not 'obviously' not off topic. I thought it might have been deemed off topic at a later time.Mystress Angelique Serpent <MystressATnospamfire-serpent.com> wrote:
> Obviously it is not off topic, or you would not have read posts about
>him in the archives.
>
>At 12:09 PM 29/10/02, you wrote:
>>This is the second suggestion I've received to discuss osho off the
>>list. Is osho considered less relevant to kundalina than all this other
>>stuff I've been hearing about - such as people's neuroses, and the talk
>>about their pets - that has no direct bearing on kundalini either?
>
>
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
http://www.domin8rex.com/serpent/spirit/kindex.htm
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2002b/k200206243.html
|