To: K-list
Recieved: 2002/10/25 18:30
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [K-list] Re: M e's post and ego]]
From: M e
On 2002/10/25 18:30, M e posted thus to the K-list:
Seems your "Love and Light" doesn't go very deep ... Lady.
M e
---
----- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [K-list] Re: M e's post and ego]
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:57:55 -0400
From: "Lady Joyce" <ladyjoyATnospamvoicenet.com>
To: "Kundalini-Gateway" <K-list >, "M e"
<evening0starATnospamnetscape.net>
References: <3DB9E43A.20909ATnospamnetscape.net>
Well, fuck you , too!!!
Love and Light,Joyce
----- Original Message -----
From: "M e"
To: "Kundalini-Gateway"
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: [Fwd: [K-list] Re: M e's post and ego]> Thank you, steven, for your invitation to share my personal
> experiences as a 'follower' (he would object to that word, I know) of
> osho. It seems I am finding myself at cross purposes on this mailing
> list, though. I've received a lot of flak here, for no better reason
> than that I didn't follow standard procedure in introducing myself. It
> seems to me it should be pretty obvious why I responded as I did. I
> put a lot of time and effort into my original post because I'm very
> concerned about the gross misperceptions many people have regarding osho
> and his work. Yet, my very understandable reasons for going to so much
> trouble have been totally disregarded. And now you tell me you would
> appreciate my "not digging up old bones and bludgeoning everyone else
> with them." Well, if that's how you feel about it, then I would say
> that you have no understanding of, or concern with, me and my feelings -
> or with the truth. And then you turn around and ask me to share my
> personal experiences!!! Well, I don't think so. In fact, I think I'll
> just fade into the background here for a while, and if anything of
> interest comes up, I'll come back in and do things by the book. I'll
> smile, and curtsy, and fawn a little; and everyone will be happy. Ho hum.
>
> M e
>
> ---
----- Original Message --------
> Subject: [K-list] Re: M e's post and ego
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:26:05 -0400
> From: Stephen Kowalchuk
> To: K-list
> References: <1035473739.1355.54908.m10ATnospamyahoogroups.com
> *smile* the truth exists whether or not we see it, whether or not we
> speak it.
> if it is true that Osho had nothing to do with that stuff, then the
> truth will
> eventually surface, no matter what I say.
>
> until then, I am entitled to my opinion, and you are entitled to yours. I
> would, however, appreciate you not digging up these old bones and
> bludgeoning
> everyone else with them.
>
> rather, I would love to hear about your experience as a follower of Osho.
> things that struck you as particularly insightful or useful in navigating
> everyday life are especially appreciated.
>
> feel free to contact me off-list if the material is long or off-topic for
> Kundalini.
>
> Steve
>
> K-list wrote:
> >
> >
> > Just for the record, I didn't say anything about ego....
>
> > Shows how much you know.
>
> > Osho is not a philosopher.
>
> > Hey, I like my jewel-encrusted crown. And don't concern yourself with
> > the glitter, it never gets in the way ... well, hardly ever.
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
http://www.domin8rex.com/serpent/spirit/kindex.htm
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.