Kundalini Gateway Email List Archives

line

To: K-list
Recieved: 2002/09/24 22:01
Subject: [K-list] Re: I Thought Ego
From: David Bozzi


On 2002/09/24 22:01, David Bozzi posted thus to the K-list:

--- In Kundalini-GatewayATnospamy..., Stephen Kowalchuk <spkATnospamk...> wrote:

> *shakes his head* that boy ain't right...

LOL!

I ain't right.
That's what I keep trying to tell folks...
I'm no different than you.

> my last $.02 on ego:

With regard to ego one will always need more ...

> I think Joe's got a point that a healthy concept of self is
> needed to survive the process of being dismantled piece by piece, as
> K tends to do.

Kundalini 'attacks' both intact egos
and disbalanced egos.

That's a fact.

If there's an ego
(intact or not)

it's a limit to be transcended...
(Kundalini distinguishes no difference)

If one has an issue with the fact
that Kundalini knows no boundaries
regarding what kinds of egos
It decides to dissolve,
than one has a restrictive issue
with regard to energy in general
to address...

Kundalini dissolves *all* egos
(intact or not)

If anyone wants to claim otherwise
I suggest checking yourself into the
nearest mental institution in the proximity
of the the particular body that influences
and has hold over you.

> - I also think Joe's got a point that *technically* speaking* the
> ego doesn't get killed but is transcended in enlightened folks.

So-called 'enlightened folks'
are no more above
the average person
than the average person
is above the average chimp...

Only an inflated ego
would dare suggest otherwise.

> However, I also think from the perspective of the old ego,
> transcendence indicates the old is killed when the new self emerges.

I have a question.

How does that which never existed to begin with
get killed?

> And in Sivananda's writings, he says it more or less gets obliterated.

That's a metaphor.
Only a fool could take it literally.
(see above)

> - I also think precision is relative, and an email list does not
> qualify as an appropriate medium for acerbic debates on "kill" vs.
> "transcend". If I die, sure, I transcend flesh. To everyone else,
> I'm killed. BFD.

But once flesh is denied
who knows for sure
whether or not if
Mother Universe provides
a new mechanism or not
for foolishness
to be manifested?

> As a moderator of this list, I ask you and anyone else to wrap up
> your thoughts in one final post and move on.
> And that's my ego talking...

You think?

David
(anti-moderator)

http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
http://www.domin8rex.com/serpent/spirit/kindex.htm

blank
DISCLAIMER!

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
blank
K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
line
  • Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
  • All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the at symbol symbol.
  • All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
  • This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
  • URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2002b/k200205700.html