To: K-list
Recieved: 2002/07/23 14:45
Subject: [K-list] The magic of math and its insanity
From: Grant -
On 2002/07/23 14:45, Grant - posted thus to the K-list:
Hello all,
I'm having trouble with the concept of crawling back to the womb.
The comments specifically about running back home because we cant stick it
out here in the physical.
It may just be mindless banter from this lanoo, but using these terms seems
a little contradictory...
For example, the suggestion of black and white magic, moving back or
forward, onward and upwards or back into the womb of hiding; all seem to be
illusionary, in a way thats very difficult to describe. Saying all is one,
or om tat sat is all fine and good yet it means nothing if it's not a
realization. Its just a bunch of words smacked together.
I'll try to explain my thinking. The term linear may be false. "Linear"
changes of any kind cannot exist to us, but the term is created out of an
illusionary perspective of things. Not unlike tilting a piece of paper
(rectangle) on its side to see a thin line. No.. that was a bad example.
Imagine a point on a very large circle. Now then, this point is a sentient
observer. No let's not use sentient... its just an observer. A 3-dimensional
camera on a track. Now it runs and runs along the track full circle viewing
everything along that circumferance until its back where it started.
Wait a sec. He's right back to where he was in the first place! He must have
gone backwards at some point, giving up his progression, and throwing it all
away because he ran back to what he knew! Oh hold on. Nope, he didnt go
backwards at any point at all... in fact look at this, he's not even the
same camera, look at all the amazing footage he's shot along his trip!
In fact, let me say, in the height of my insanity, that a line is a paradox
in itself. No man can create a line because a line is in imaginary beast. A
chimera no less! It has no dimension, no width, only 2 points which are also
fantisful indeed. So what does this mean? Well a line can never be crossed.
The line has no dimension to be subject to, and thus you are either this
much away from the line on side A or, that much away from the line, on the
other side which is side B. Position and reference exist in subjectivity.
A point is what? A dot? No no, impossible. A dot is a filled circle, a
matrix of points in itself. Imaginary things. But they help us think. They
are walls to climb- we climb and climb until we reach the top and say "ah,
what an excellent view, I need to go that way." And then we climb down and
find our wall jarring our path.
I shall attempt to finalize this composition of nonsense by explaining the
illusion of infinity. Infinity is what exactly? A line that goes on forever?
Expansiveness to no end? Not possible by our simple-minded 3 dimensional
means. Why... an infinity means no ending dimensional attributes. Thus
infinity can only exist in non-existance- or nothing at all.
A line going into infinity never ends- ever. Which is impossible in itself
because it ends when we stop giving it thought. Thats the truth to an
infinity. It will go on forever, until it is ignored. So what creates the
illusion of infinity? Well how about the term fractal. Self-simularity then.
As above so below fits this concept.
A fractal pattern is a simple concept, reproducing the infinity dillusion.
For example, "let S be the set of numbers, that do not contain itself". Uh
oh... then the set of S would look like
S[]
And then we construct it and...
S[S[S[S[S[.....(infinity here)]]]]]
There is no end.
A fractal pattern can be magnified to no end, to show its complex beautiful
self-simularity.
If a line were to be drawn out to infinity, you would fail instantly. As
soon as the pen touched the page, it has concieved an initial dimension.
Thus since it has a beginning, it has concieved an end as well. It cannot
exist at all without both being present.
BUT! The beauty of fractalness is that it never ends because it had never
started in the first place. What you see is only dependant on which point of
origion you place yourself at.
The more complex the fractal the more earthly world it creates into stunning
and mesmerizing visuals.
Did you know the most complex music compositions can be re-created with a
simple fractal pattern, nearly exactly? Bach for example. Our mind sees the
truth, and the beauty whether we realize it or not sometimes.
Mandalas are fractal, often.
Some crop circles are the most beautiful clippings of fractal equasions!
Even davincis paintings!
The level is repeated below itself and above itself into infinity, yet is
never the same and so creates anoter illusion of linearness, something like
time. Self-simular, ever repeating, and yet never the same twice.________
-"Your path is mine."_____________
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
http://www.domin8rex.com/serpent/spirit/kindex.htm
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.