To: K-list
Recieved: 2002/06/27 15:34
Subject: Re: [K-list] Digest Number 1065
From: Soitpp
On 2002/06/27 15:34, Soitpp posted thus to the K-list:
In a message dated 6/27/02 2:15:51 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
K-list writes:
> ><<<If people would only interpret Christianity the way it really should
> >be interpreted. . .>>>
>
> I find this funny. I read it, "If only everybody agreed with me, they
> would be better off because I am wiser than they."
frick.. sorry for that accidental last send.
I interpret it like this.... "If only everybody could feel my love"
You don't gotta be so cynical,
> I have not seen a sentence containing the word "should" that is not a
> judgment, a separation. Wanting to change what Is.
sounds so much like you want to change the "shoulds" yerself
> >cw wrote,
> >Religions were created to control the people so that they would
> >not be able to find their personal integrity - or express their
> >experience without the sanction of some religious authority.
> >***
> I humbly, and totally disagree. Religions, IMO came into being as people
> TRIED to teach others, give them a certain path, a door, to access the felt
>
> presence of GOD. To say that all religions were born from those seeking to
> control others is to admit that you would like to do that same thing, and
> therefore think that you are very familiar with the motivation of all other
>
> religious/spiritual leaders.
>
I think you are both correct, I believe in many circumstances the origins of
a religion had very spiritual roots but often became corrupted later,.. also,
some religions were created for reasons of control from the very beginning,..
although, I should say, it's not so much the religions, but the controlling
factions behind them.. sometimes they borrow scripture, and make it into a
new religion
The best way to understand it, in my opinion, is to try to stop looking for
absolute good and evil's, try to see that each religion or sect or faction,
is really a conglomeration of personalities and different intentions, each of
them is also a sort of archtype that represents thousands or millions of
other minds who are moving in a similiar direction, once again :) like a
mandala
> I notice that you only refer to God as K. Is that the 'religion' that you
> would be leader of? Will we 'CWKundalinites' be able to express OUR
> personal
> experiences and integrety without YOUR religious authority?
no one can take your power unless you let them ;)
> I remember during the 60's being amazed that some people could seem to
> maintain control while under Acid! :))
heh heh, it's all a matter of how much acid, and how prepared you are..
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
http://www.domin8rex.com/serpent/spirit/kindex.htm
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.