To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/05/14 15:58
Subject: [K-list] Intent
From: Cleocatras
On 2001/05/14 15:58, Cleocatras posted thus to the K-list:
<It was just too easy to blast validity holes in that one... LOL>
Then why bother.. don't you think the list members can think for
themselves?>
Why does anyone bother? Same reason.
My thoughts are all tapped out anyway, to be honest.
Not much more off-the-norm thoughts left past the ones I have recently
shared, and the extent of topics that I feel I might know a little helpful
something or other, having already said most of what I have learned.
Statistically, the pedofile thread probably addressed issues with 40 or 50 on
the list in my estimation.
<Cat, I have spoken to stand up for you when I felt you were being
unfairly treated.. it is unfortunate that you seem to be taking advantage
of my protection to treat other members disrespectfully. Enough, already.
Surely your son needs your attention more than CW or the list?>
I dont understand how sharing my take on the validity of a study would be
interpreted as disrespect for CW. Never even crossed my mind. The Duhhh, was
not for him, simply and adjective directed to the study itself... Today is
another day and although yesterday was an aggrivated day, and it showed... it
was not washing into the next... but I suppose the whole matter created
enough fallout that I must now be accountable in any case.
For this I apologize that I was not aware of my own doings and did not
purposefully project what everyone else interpreted.
As far as expert, I only share what I experienced. I dont know anything else,
and my only emotionally charged topic is now over and past as of yesterday
evening, and unless a few readers have compelling posts for me to answer, its
alphanumerics over the bridge. Don't know too much about any other topics
except changing brakes on my car or welding, or making money on garage sales.
My apologies to anyone who took offense. And yes, Im a little lame about
boundaries for the reasons that I explained earlier, and do accept kind
criticism on a regular basis. Although it never even crossed my mind what you
are saying I was doing, I admit I was following format to respond in
questioning for the sake of dialogue and in the same manner that others have
also done acceptably. Learning by example, I assumed there was a degree of
permission here for that form of debate. My error.
Blessings,
Cat
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.