To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/05/04 23:33
Subject: Re: [K-list] Ramana Maharshi
From: Pepper J. Baxter
On 2001/05/04 23:33, Pepper J. Baxter posted thus to the K-list: Well! I guess I got told. Could someone else maybe answer some of the questions
I posted? Pepper
Harsha wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pepper J. Baxter [mailto:"pjdaveybaxterATnospamnctimes.net"ATnospamnctimes.net]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 1:21 AM
> To: Harsha; K-list
> Subject: Re: [K-list] Ramana Maharshi
>
> I thought that an enlightened person has such strong radiation's that
> maggots
> could not destroy the body for a very long length of time depending on how
> strong is his enlightenment. If degrees of strong radiation's have anything
> to
> do with it. Is there degrees of enlightenment? Do you know? I don't know! If
> Master isn't strong enough to take care of himself then how enlightened
> could he
> be. In modern day if we don't have a job we end up just like your Master,
> starving and eaten by maggots, or begging for handouts.
> The body is a thing of beauty, and "God made". So, I respect it! What was
> the
> reason for treating it as a corps? Is it seen as a spiritual thing? I
> thought we
> were supposed to treat the body with respect and keep it clean and taken
> care of
> so it won't go all to heck and stop serving us by it's physical life being
> cut
> too short. I also don't understand that one should make themselves other
> peoples
> responsibility, and causing hardships on others who are trying to stay
> independent so they won't have to end up in the streets. If they get dragged
> down to the dependent persons level because of him then they all go down. I
> don't understand!. I read a lot and one book says this, and another says
> that.
> I hear though that when people become enlightened then God takes care of
> them in
> such a way that they don't have to work. I know of two. These people know
> they
> are being taken care of as the fish in the sea, and the fowl of the air.
> They
> have plenty, and live very well.
> Those who aren't enlightened to that degree yet need to get a job and learn
> independence. That is unless they are too lazy by nature, and then they
> won't.
> Otherwise they can't learn to use independence wisely by not letting their
> lower
> nature take control. So, you won't have earned enlightenment until you do
> learn.
> That's the conclusion I have come to.
> I could be wrong. Am I, or what?
> I am not judging your Master, only wondering if there is indeed reasons
> behind
> what I am wondering about that I don't understand. ( You might say I am
> mainly a realist in one sense of the word. So I hope I did not hurt your
> feelings.) Pepper
> _______
> Not at all. I very much enjoyed the reading. Thank you. :-).
>
> Love
> Harsha
>
>
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001/k200102271.html
|