To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/03/27 11:03
Subject: Re: [K-list] C'mon lurkers
From: percyval
On 2001/03/27 11:03, percyval posted thus to the K-list: hi again Lew,
ok, i had to quickly clear up any misconception about my loud foolin
around obnoxious toungue-in-cheek comment... i'd still like to discuss a
few other things you said...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Llewellyn" <llewellynjATnospamearthlink.net>
> There is a difference between tough love and just being tough or
> displaying prowess or power or knowledge. The intentionality is the
key. I
> have had all of the tough love that i could take and those words were
used
> by my family when they threw me into a mental hospital because of k
> awakening -
> "you never understood tough love" my mother said - i understand
plenty - i
> understood the intention
well. i can see why you have strong feelings about that distinction...
and your point is well taken... although i am a fan of tough love.. i
don't think whatt your family did you to you was tough love... although
that is what they called it... to me tough love has a "take it or leave
it" component... you were not allowed to choose to leave it...
> i think most people intuitively feel the difference emanating from
the
> posts - as has been discussed many times on the list, we read between
and
> under the words - many times imperfectly - but we are k - that is
what we
> do - there are many flare-ups due to reading the underlying message
and
> calling someone on it - did so - did not - and on it goes - who is
calling
> who on what - the surface words keep on reflecting; the message's
soul
> absorbs all
oh yeah.. there is plenty of underlying shadowy stuff in so many
posts... i like the drama of it though...
> yes perhaps I need a gentler list - are there any that are not
wrapped
> up in some religious mumbo-jumbo?
i don't know.. very few of the other ones have held my interest,
although i have lurked on most lists that show up in a search of
"kundalini"...
> My voice is not usually kind, although perhaps it is unique -
from impressions without remembering specific posts... that is how i
perceive you...
> Also i am only looking at a narrow window which is probably not
> representative. So, no need to get your dander up, or come to the
defense
> of the list - if we are not allowed to voice a general dissenting
impression
> than indeed the list is a pretty tame place. But i have, so it is not.
well i hope you understand that my dander is not up, i was fooling
around... but i feel that the list is beautiful in all it's
imperfections... along with all the beauty, posts are often pompous,
nasty behind pretty words, and at times unkind to folks... but i find it
so beautiful and interesting... and i love the presence of dissenting
posts... so thank you, we would stagnate without them...
i love what this list is...exactly as it never stays... it's always
changing, but somehow, so much is all the same...
warmly,
percyval
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001/k200101656.html
|