To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/03/22 13:49
Subject: Re: [K-list] I sugest a lurker week
From: percyval
On 2001/03/22 13:49, percyval posted thus to the K-list: From: <druoutATnospamaol.com>
> chbioenergyATnospambtclick.com writes:
> > Would it not be a good idea to have a lurker's week no one who has
posted in
> > the last month to post for a week.
>
> Good idea Chris! :))
>
> Hereby lurking.
i think it's a nice idea, BUT doubt it would work out well... it calls
too much attention to the posts of folks who may be shy to begin with...
and then there might not be much response to what they post, which
wouldn't be nice...
how about an asshole's week? (not meant to imply that lurkers or people
suggesting lurker's week are assholes)... this can be its first post...
hehehehehhee...
as whole,
percyval
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001/k200101532.html
|