To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/03/19 22:24
Subject: [K-list] nasty questions (was: over-sensitivity)
From: percyval

From: <wrmspiritATnospamaol.com>
> I'm just curious here....Is the above message being shared with the
list to
> be considered as an example which could be beneficial for the members
here?
> Using a judgement of another to communicate one's displeasure of
> judgements?...and if not..then for what reason is it being shared?

Norma, i am starting to doubt that your many questions are based on
"curiosity" or "wonder"... you recently asked me questions that felt
like condemnations of an action (swallowing "the fountain") that you
perceived me to be promoting... meanwhile, i had not mentioned anything
about this... perhaps something else i said is what really got you
hot...

when i told you that i'd prefer not to answer that here, you made more
comments about why i should answer here... it felt sarcastic and
condemning to me when you wrote: "There should be no reason not to
continue discussion here...unless of course...you have categorized
Kundalini as being nothing more than sexual...." as if percyval (of all
people) might be so dirty ...*wink*

so i finally answered you, and i asked you some questions (see below)
partly out of genuine curiosity, and perhaps partly in hope that you
might see something that i felt you were projecting onto me... i took
the time for you, at your request, and then you ignored me...

now you have more questions... somehow these don't really feel like
curiosity either... so i will take a turn at judgemental B*tchin" (as
most regular posters tend to do on occasion), except i will do it
directly:

you are thinly veiling your judgemental B*tchin' as questions, but it is
showing through your disguise of wonder, curiosity and wrmspirit... you
just sound nasty...

percyval

----- Original Message ----- (snipped as much as i could, Mystress)
From: "percyval" <percyvalATnospamrcn.com>
To: "kundalini-list" <K-list >
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [K-list] Percyval

> From: <wrmspiritATnospamaol.com>
> > With all you know now...the relationship of Kundalini to
orgasms....I must
> > wonder why you would want to [snip] swallow
> > it... and force it to travel down the pathway of your digestive
> > organs....where the process of elimination is...
(snip)
> so firstly, i don't believe i ever mentioned "swallowing"... where did
> you get this idea from? (not that i think anything is wrong with
> this)... did someone else or i mention it? or is this something
> your own mind originated?
>
> secondly, why do you feel the digestive process is about elimination?
> although elimination is wonderful, i believe the digestive process is
> about nourishment... the body consumes matter, and then sorts it
out...
> absorbing what it considers to be nourishment, leaving as much of the
> rest as possible behind to be eliminated...
>
> lastly, if not "eliminated" by swallowing, wouldn't it then be
> eliminated by the laundry and/or evaporation?

<

DISCLAIMER!

---

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe

K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.

Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.

All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.

All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©

This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.

URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001/k200101409.html