To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/03/19 19:20
Subject: Re: [K-list] over-sensitivity.
From: v
On 2001/03/19 19:20, v posted thus to the K-list: > >Mystress Angelique Serpent wrote:
> >
> > > <snip> Even regular awakened folks who are not
> > > "clinical" like V., may go through hypersensitive periods where the energy
> > > itself is almost more than their minds can cope with, let alone having some
>
> > > righteous idiot pushing their buttons and spewing judgments out of some
> > > wayward "good intention".
> > > Let alone feeling unsafe to share with other members, even off list
> > > for fear of having private mail "outed" on the list.
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >Angelique and List,
> > Gee, I apologize that I caused such a ruckus now. Ironically, earlier this
>
> >afternoon, I had decided to forgive Simon. He has been so tactfully
> >defended by
> >Wim, and I realized that - although he is somewhat long-winded in making many
> >misconstrued points around this situation, that he really meant no harm
> >purposefully. He wasn't TRYING to push my buttons, he just managed to.
> >Unfortunately, the post I wrote to officially forgive him was lost when my
> >computer mysteriously shut down, and I had no time to recompose it at that
> >time.
> > Yet, it *is* a good thing that people honor the rules of netiquette,
> > such as
> >NOT posting private emails to the list, especially on here where we are
> >composed
> >in a large part by the "walking wounded". And yes, at the time when I
> >wrote "back
> >off", his reaction to that urban legend post about me having no heart, and
> >being
> >cold and clinical WAS too much unwarranted criticism for me to bear, and
> >particularly the length. It would have been nicer if it had never
> >happened, but
> >it did, and it never stopped. Just recently ribbing me for not using my
> >sense of
> >humor, and also how adversity is a neccessary part of communication, plus
> >Wim's
> >defense of him, I did decide that none of this controversy was
> >neccessarily meant
> >to harm me, nor worth continueing.
> >
> > But, thankyou Angelique. Perhaps it was the way of the Forces to
> > mysteriously
> >shut down my computer earlier this afternoon, so that you could admonish
> >people
> >as to the importance of being respectful, such as you did, anyway.
> >
> > But, I *have* forgiven him unconditionally, as long as he is more
> > sensitive to
> >who I am, what I meant, and how harsh criticism might make me (or anyone)
> >feel.
> >He has been quite insightful in his other posts to everyone else, so I hope
> >you'll stick around, Simon. Just don't decide how people *are* without
> >knowing,
> >or giving them a chance, okay? And - fix your "reply" and/or "Reply All"
> >buttons!
> >
> > Now - I have an issue with being termed as "clinical", inasmuch as I have
> >NEVER been hospitalized for psychological or emotional issues, have no suicide
>
> >attempts, and in every other way highly functioning in my life. "Clinical"
> >connotes "clinic", which implies psych wards and specialists, of which I
> >have not
> >ever seen the inside of the former, nor do I have access to the latter.
> >
> > But I will post my defense of the various levels of "mood disorders" in
> >another post.
> >
> >pax,
> >valerie
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001/k200101400.html
|