To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/03/18 19:02
Subject: Re: FW: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
From: Wim Borsboom

Valerie, Simon is really OK.
Wim

----- Original Message -----
From: "v" <amusedATnospamptialaska.net>
To: "S.G." <pyyemanATnospampyyeman.screaming.net>
Cc: <K-list >
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: FW: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox

> I don't exactly appreciate being flamed twice now by you, and then acting
> publically like it's *me* who's being strange to you. And now you're
discussing
> me publically as if I didn't exist.
> What have I ever done to you to merit this animosity?
> Do you even know who I am???
> check it out:
> http://sites.netscape.net/voopr/flow
> vc
>
> "S.G." wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: S.G. [mailto:pyyemanATnospampyyeman.screaming.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 5:30 PM
> > To: Wim Borsboom
> > Subject: RE: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
> >
> > Thankyou for your Diplomacy again Wim.
> >
> > Yes this did cross my mind before I posted my reply but I was fazed at
how
> > the first couple of lines could be read as friendly when it would have
been
> > just as easy to say that I was being too serious about humour!:
> >
> > "you arte certainly looking for a fight, but about what? You are TOO
> > serious, eh?"
> >
> > Sorry guys but my mirth wouldnt stretch that far
> >
> > No swordplay I promise and plenty of roaring!
> >
> > Once again, heartfelt thanks for your kind words Wim
> >
> > >From the heart and the head
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wim Borsboom [mailto:aurasphereATnospamhome.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 4:34 PM
> > To: K-list ; S.G.
> > Subject: Re: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
> >
> > Simon,
> >
> > You wrote to v.:
> > > You seemed to have missed the whole point of my message and are more
> > > interested in provoking a reaction from me.
> > >
> > > Had you been paying attention you would have gleaned that I was
sharing my
> > > uncontrolled spasms of belly thunder at the Fiona thread and our
tendency
> > to
> > > take ourselves too seriously!
> >
> > I actually think that v. had the same sense of humour with her post to
you
> > in mind...
> > We should those emoticons :-) or :-( more often. Body language does not
get
> > digitised too easily through Cyberia. They are silly but do serve a
> > purpose...
> >
> > Crossing wires... yes maybe... but swords...not!
> > Keep laughing and sharing your uncontrolled spasms of belly thunder,
Simon.
> > And hang in there, we need you and love you...
> >
> > Love ,
> > Thunder and brimstone (not) laughter...
> > Wim

http://www.kundalini-gateway.org

DISCLAIMER!

---

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe

K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.

Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.

All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.

All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©

This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.

URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2001/k200101382.html