To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/03/18 18:56
Subject: Re: FW: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
From: v
On 2001/03/18 18:56, v posted thus to the K-list:
well Wim,
you know this whole thing started when I responded to that McDonald's urban
legend thing that you posted, and just because I had read it so many many
times over the years. He lambasted me for being "cold and unfeeling" because
of that, and now I can't even have a little humor when I come home in the
middle of the night.
I really didn't mean anything by either of these posts, I really wasn't
even thinking about it. I've been on this forum since circa 1995, and have
never had so much trouble with just my occasional commentary. Sure - it's not
high falutin' spiritual teachings being channelled from the muses or the space
aliens, but it's just me - my thoughts.
Maybe people don't really realize the physical "slap in the face" feelings
that come when somebody takes something you say WAY WAY out of context, and
chastises (aka "flames") you for pages and pages - publically. But it really
doesn't make you feel too good about yourself, and why bother to do it anyway,
about such penny ante and superficial type commentaries???
Now, I am not of the school of "behavioural psychology", ironically enough.
I am a *humanitarian*. And - au contraire to what S.G. has accused me of, my
heart is way too big. I am an empath and very over-sensitive already. So, for
someone whom I don't even know, to get ON my case like this, over NOTHING, and
make a big case about it, and TELL me how I am and who I am in a very negative
fashion, is beyond my comprehension! He's treating me like one of Skinner's
rats, telling me when to salivate, and when I do, hyper-analyzing me beyond
the point that even people who *know* me should be allowed to advise me about!
And publically!
So, maybe S.G. is really "okay", but has yet to treat me with the respect
that I deserve. And - yes. He has hurt my feelings, which is stupid, because I
don't even know him either.
pax,
valerie
Wim Borsboom wrote:
> Valerie, Simon is really OK.
> Wim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "v" <amusedATnospamptialaska.net>
> To: "S.G." <pyyemanATnospampyyeman.screaming.net>
> Cc: <K-list >
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 4:41 PM
> Subject: Re: FW: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
>
> > I don't exactly appreciate being flamed twice now by you, and then acting
> > publically like it's *me* who's being strange to you. And now you're
> discussing
> > me publically as if I didn't exist.
> > What have I ever done to you to merit this animosity?
> > Do you even know who I am???
> > check it out:
> > <http://sites.netscape.net/voopr/flow>http://sites.netscape.net/voopr/flow
> > vc
> >
> > "S.G." wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: S.G. [mailto:pyyemanATnospampyyeman.screaming.net]
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 5:30 PM
> > > To: Wim Borsboom
> > > Subject: RE: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
> > >
> > > Thankyou for your Diplomacy again Wim.
> > >
> > > Yes this did cross my mind before I posted my reply but I was fazed at
> how
> > > the first couple of lines could be read as friendly when it would have
> been
> > > just as easy to say that I was being too serious about humour!:
> > >
> > > "you arte certainly looking for a fight, but about what? You are TOO
> > > serious, eh?"
> > >
> > > Sorry guys but my mirth wouldnt stretch that far
> > >
> > > No swordplay I promise and plenty of roaring!
> > >
> > > Once again, heartfelt thanks for your kind words Wim
> > >
> > > >From the heart and the head
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wim Borsboom [mailto:aurasphereATnospamhome.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 4:34 PM
> > > To: K-list ; S.G.
> > > Subject: Re: [K-list] The Fiona Paradox
> > >
> > > Simon,
> > >
> > > You wrote to v.:
> > > > You seemed to have missed the whole point of my message and are more
> > > > interested in provoking a reaction from me.
> > > >
> > > > Had you been paying attention you would have gleaned that I was
> sharing my
> > > > uncontrolled spasms of belly thunder at the Fiona thread and our
> tendency
> > > to
> > > > take ourselves too seriously!
> > >
> > > I actually think that v. had the same sense of humour with her post to
> you
> > > in mind...
> > > We should those emoticons :-) or :-( more often. Body language does not
> get
> > > digitised too easily through Cyberia. They are silly but do serve a
> > > purpose...
> > >
> > > Crossing wires... yes maybe... but swords...not!
> > > Keep laughing and sharing your uncontrolled spasms of belly thunder,
> Simon.
> > > And hang in there, we need you and love you...
> > >
> > > Love ,
> > > Thunder and brimstone (not) laughter...
> > > Wim
<><>
<
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.