To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/02/23 09:35
Subject: [K-list] Re: Wynter's Kundalini
From: SA Carlson
On 2001/02/23 09:35, SA Carlson posted thus to the K-list:
JB,
When I saw your response to Christopher's benign post I thought that
maybe your were having just a bad hair day cause i felt like you
responded as if Christopher had called your mother filthy names.
I didn't understand your point either but I sure could tell you were
upset.
If your communication is misunderstood don't blame the hearer and
slander their character. It is incumbent on you to make sure your
message is clear and understandable or you will be misunderstood. Just
like now.
I would suggest you look at your own life and see how often a pattern
arises of you being misunderstood by others arises. If there is a
pattern, evaluate your own skills as a listener. Great communicators
are expert listeners.
Blessings,
Susan
--- In Kundalini-GatewayATnospamy..., JB789ATnospamh... wrote:
>
> (the real 'Re:' does not work/gets not posted, so I send it as an
> initial post)
> Ok, very funny/sad ..
> the sado-masochistic joke/actuality.
> And somebody else has replied to me private and asked "So what's
your
> point ?" Either he has own his personal definition of what a 'point'
> is, or he simply did not see/face the simple pointer I communicated.
> Communication seems to be almost an impossibility. Very rarely
people
> bother to Hear/reply to the Essence of another's communication.
> One is greatly preoccupied with personal plans for great, personal
> orgasmic 'enlightenmnet', while facts one does not like, are simply
> looked away from.. Avoided, or not responded to, or buried below the
> chuckles of self-satisfied & 'spiritually' narcisistic indulgences.
> No wonder one does not see a simple 'point'..
> and so the 'point' will go on, in spite of ...
>
> --- In Kundalini-GatewayATnospamy..., Mystress Angelique Serpent
> <MystressATnospamk...> wrote:
> > Gosh, just when I thought nobody was ever going to respond to
> one of
> > Christopher's posts ever again.. just because I said I allowed him
> to post
> > because he creates discussion.
> >
> > Christopher, I'm not going to remove you, but perhaps it is
> time you
> > took a hit with a clue stick (whack!) and figgered out that
perhaps
> your
> > postings are not appreciated here.. and it might be a better use
of
> > bandwidth to spend your energy somewhere else, where you are
> appreciated.
> >
> > At 07:20 AM 2/22/01, JB789ATnospamh... wrote:
> > >are,.. considering the cases of sexual abuse of disciples and
> children and
> > >other despotic cruelties and manipulations, practiced by these
> > >representatives/messengers of the 'how-to' of 'divine truth' and
> > >'spiritual development'.)
> >
> > Well, I sexually abuse and manipulate only my most devoted
> disciples
> > with the kind of despotic cruelties they like best.. because they
> like it!!
> > Wheeeee! Consensuality. That's enlightenment!
> > Gosh, i am in a silly silly mood tonight..
> > Blessings.....
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.