To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/01/19 21:27
Subject: Re: [K-list] another thought on activism
From: David Bozzi
On 2001/01/19 21:27, David Bozzi posted thus to the K-list:
CLEOCATRAsATnospamaol.com wrote:
> I have gone round and round
> about me sacrificing for someone else's situation to get better.
If one makes a sacrifice for the betterment of another and succeeds
there is no problem.
If one makes a 'sacrifice' for the betterment of another
and has reservation,
there is a problem.
> I am not saying she is not right, by any means.
Who is?
> I just only knew a very few things in this realm of our discussion.
To know much in any realm of discussion is still next to nothing.
> My current philosophy is there are some who involve themselves in inflicting
> apparent harm and suffering onto other people. These "some" are radically
> purposeful and very obvious, others and an even larger group, shrouds their
> agenda in "higher purpose", but whose long term effect is also creating an
> unknown future hardship maybe even more profound and that most of us cannot
> foresee...
Weathermen can't even predict weather.
> on the opposite end of this spectrum are the recipients of these
> things...
We receive what we reap.
> now if we are talking about survival here, who is surviving? Those with the
> aggressive, or assertive undesireable attributes, is who!
Is being overly aggressive & assertive, Living?
> As someone said it
> on this list the women burned as witches were those who had special talent.
Perhaps they were not as special as those who burned them believed.
> What kind of social darwinism is that???
To understand the wisdom of why what happens, happens,
requires complete & utter selflessness.
> So lets suppose we define those people in the middle who are not really
> either victim or violator... the dont take sides.
No one takes no sides.
> Has anyone ever considered
> the thought that it is apathy that allows the most destruction? Ommission is
> permission.
Omission is ignorance.
We are all infected with it.
What to do? What not to do?
> By not choosing, you have already taken sides with the aggressor or the force
> that is inflicting harm.
We are the Aggressor.
We are the Aggressed.
> Because Omission of your disapproval is the same as
> giving consent.
If I don't know I love Something
that I'm unaware of
it doesn't mean that I hate It.
> Now I realize this entire writing may label me as part of the low end of the
> enlightened ones...
Not even.
You are 100%, truly and holy unenlightened.
(I assure you)
> everything has it purpose, including my own inperfection.
Do you know what it is?
> I for one, cannot stand and watch someone I love suffering...
Including yourself?
> I faithfully
> assist with the skills Goddess has given me, and Goddess faithfully keeps my
> head just barely above water...
Who you are and Goddess are not so far apart.
> But Goddess miraculously does provide everything I need as I "continually
> stick my stupid neck out to assist"...
Your stupid neck is not even yours.
It belongs to Goddess.
> Cat
David
(doG)
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.