To: K-list
Recieved: 2001/01/08 18:27
Subject: Re: [K-list] Re: Is Evolution Catching?
From: Christopher Wynter
On 2001/01/08 18:27, Christopher Wynter posted thus to the K-list:
Samantha..
The simple answer here is
who was it, that as a child made your intuition
and soul contact so very wrong
that you have had to put so much energy into
proving your self right.
What you are trying to do is find evidence
to support your own knowing. You are not
looking for answers .. merely trying to justify
the intuitive consciousness of a child
who has been told once too often
she doesn't know anything about
what she is talking about.
The sooner you accept what you intuitively
know and stop taking on other people's false
logic, the sooner you will find what you know
is very real .. and it will work for you
but don't try to tell others what you know,
unless they ask, because the universal law says
that if you talk about what you know, you will
attract someone to prove you wrong ..
until you recover your childhood innocence
Yours is a very common story ..
and
the root of all spiritual searching for knowledge
(of course, you could try to find the right guru
who will show you how you are right
for a fee ... :)~ ...
CW
At 12:13 PM 9/01/01, you wrote:
>Mystress,
>
>What I said about science is the way science is structured. It has
>nothing to do with what I believe. That that structure rest on things
>that cannot be subjected to the methods of science does of course raise
>some really good questions.
>
>Believe me I do ask God-dess, guru, DNA, ascended masters and anything
>else I've ever heard of for help resolving my doubts. Over and over and
>over again. I don't get very clear answers.
>
>Spankings happily accepted.... Polls are irrelevant.
>
>I have tried just believing. It does not dependably result in miracles
>in my experience. It is a funny kind of superior way of finding truth
>(superior to reason and such) that only works sometimes and if it
>doesn't work the person attempting to employ/trust it takes all the
>blame. If it works then it is the power of God-dess, K or whatever. If
>it doesn't work then it is all the fault of the practitioner. Science
>is a lot cleaner than that.
>
>I don't think it is wrong to question what intuition, mine, yours or
>someone else's, says. I think it is part of the learning experience and
>that it is part of our self-responsibility to keep some anchoring to our
>intuition. It does not at all resonate as true to me that intuition
>alone is all we need and that reason and the mind are just ego things
>that screw us up.
>
>I did not ask for iron-clad proofs. I asked if you had evidence that
>supports what your intuition says on some things or how some of them can
>be so. I don't believe that that is wrong to do. For me at least it
>seems to act as necessary counter-balance.
>
>There was admittely some energy that was just my own shit in the initial
>post. I have a great fear of going into spiritual stuff too deeply and
>loosing all grounding. Before I have noticed that I tend to open too
>far and become quite over-credulous and believing of even utterly
>bizarre and impossibly contradictory things. Being spiritual does not
>require becoming a total air-head, does it? But that was what I found
>myself doing. So I seek to keep some grounding. When too much of it
>seems to be slipping too fast I can at times start clawing to regain
>some balance.
>
>Nor is the "shit" just mine. It is very human and universal. Saying we
>should just get over it and throw our minds overboard and let whatever
>comes just come and all will be well isn't a message that resonates with
>me or that I think would be helpful for most. Countless centuries of
>much of the world believing that was the way to do things if you really
>wanted Truth (or alternately that someone else had already done so and
>you should just take their word for it) and a few doing it, by all
>reports did not greatly improve the race. Much of that time was full of
>a lot of misery and a short and quite brutish existence. So, even
>historically, I can't honestly see that the mystic way of just total
>surrender is enough. The ones that have surrendered utterly haven't
>advanced human knowledge and human living conditions nearly so much as
>those damn scientists with their logic and their questioning.
>
>So I believe a balance is needed. I am not free just to go blissfully
>diving into Divine Mother's arms and ignore whether the rest of the
>planet goes to hell in a handbasket or not. It is not in my nature. I
>don't think it is why I am here.
>
>love,
>
> samantha
http://www.kundalini-gateway.org
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.