To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/11/21 10:42
Subject: Re: [K-list] Gurus&Sex Juice vs PRINCIPLE of Ecstatic Communion
From: Wim Borsboom
On 1999/11/21 10:42, Wim Borsboom posted thus to the K-list:
Dear Martin,
> Also, are you sure the jelly-like stuff at the back of the
>palate isn't snot?
Snot its not.
The nasal cavities are not involved.
You know it when you taste it.
You just know it. Isn't that always the case? :-) :-)
>If the secretion from the testicles goes back and up instead of down and
>out, it will enter the bladder.
The epididymi are involved, they get a different functionality .
For years I did not have any nightly ejaculations, wet dreams (which are
supposed to be common, even Sri Aurobindo admitted to having them, which BTW
does not put me beyond his league, silly notion.) no urge to masturbate or
have intercourse. Yes I am healthy and all that, maybe so healthy that this
is a result. Looking years younger too now. According to the books I am
supposed to lose my gray hair as well... Shedding yes, a bit, but it is not
returning to it's original colour, have seen this happen though to a good
lady friend of mine. Want to see before and after photos? (grin)
I can be sexually active if my work requires it :-0;-) :-) .....
I check my semen under the microscope ...
Well if this isn't a Narcisisitic person eh!?
This body and this world, just being here is just so wonderful, am daily
surprised, curious and in awe.
Stop the usual description of the world
Break out of the prescribed mould
We are not templates with template behaviour
No template expectations and requirements.
Do not look for proof of what you already see, it stops curiosity and
discovery.
Martin , what I'm writing now are just some Sunday morning ruminations, of
which you happen to be the recipient, not in any way negatively directed to
you...
Science, biology, etc., which I deeply love for it's endless CURIOSITY, is
abused when it it tries to prove the 'status quo' of old and outdated
descriptions of the world. It too often only does just that, by that
definition is will always be behind. That kind of non-scence (misspelled?)
will never catch up to reality as it is lived and experienced....
So... take that. :-)
Non-scence (unscience) tries the answer NOT KNOWING, that is something else
than curiously discovering. Not wanting to know (but just proving old
dscriptions), causes scientific astigmatism. I should develop this train of
thought better, but it is such a nice sunny lazy sunday morning.
Astigmatism, aren't we commonly out of focus and seeing unmatching warped
layers of the one and only world, like binoculars with the lenses
misalligned.
Ah, calling things into question, that is the disease. The questionability
of being, that is the pain. Reality only IS, the rest is only conceptual,
descriptive... groping, questioning, doubting... ... ...
Our loss of touch with reality, our disability to be direct, forthright and
forthwith... caused by some shock mechanism that kicks us out of focus,
misallignment.
Should develop that train of thought as well... If anything, the common
disease, suffering (one belives illusion to be more real than reality) is
astigmatism at all levels of ...............
But... Sunday mornings are just so sweet..... Looking out, how robins
flutter from twig to branch on the arbutus tree. Their bellies the same
colour as the berries they come to eat.
Lovingly, Wim
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.