To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/11/16 13:43
Subject: Re: [K-list] deities
From: Steve Salter
On 1999/11/16 13:43, Steve Salter posted thus to the K-list:
Kimberly said:
>
> You seek nothing...so you are on list list to see your own words? Everyone
> is seeking something.
>
You take things too literally. By the act of not acting, by not seeking, by not
trying, I act, I find, I do.
Do you know what I mean?
All my life I have fought and striven to understand, I have pushed myself and
tried so many things and in the end I find that, for me and maybe just me alone,
that I have to let go of my ego, let go of my fight, let go of it all and by the
act of not acting...I find it all.
>
> But you had to look to find your version of truth, did you not? The wording
> of this sentence seems to mean you have tried other things.
>
I have tried so many things I am exhausted just thinking about it. I finally
stopped looking and one evening the word "kundalini" floated into my brain. Sure,
I had investigated kundalini before, maybe 10 years before, but it didn't "click"
then.
>
> The booby hatch? Is that the technical term?
>
Highly technical!
> thingie. I do have some level of restraint, although I abandoned it to silly
> so I could deal with you on your Court of the Cosmos level. :)
>
Yeah, wonder what happened to MY level of restraint today? hmmm...well, I am in
SUCH a good mood.
>
> Hint: I said "came across". It does not mean that's what you meant. Email
> is a hard medium to get your point fully across with. And I was mentioning
> that asa possible reason for disagreement. That very misunderstanding. See?
>
Oh, but I AM an atheist or at least an agnostic and if anyone wants to interpret
my words as a "jackass" as well, that is ok if it helps them deal or not deal with
things.
If nothing else, I can be accomodating.
> No, it was an honest "call em as you see em" from that and other posts.
I strongly believe in call 'em the way ya see 'em.
> since you were being hostile, difficult, and disrespectful of others' beliefs
hostile, difficult and disrespectful???? Whoa, you might wanna reread my post. I
gave my initial disclaimer that I had no problem with anyone believing anything
they wanted and just stated my own beliefs or lack thereof. The only way that
converts to being hostile, difficult and disrespectful is within your ego
framework. I am tempted to apologize if you felt threatened but then, you might
then interpret that as a patronizing attitude and things would just escalate and
WHAM BOOM, another Hiroshima.
we don't need that.
> someone do the same to you. From your response you can't take it, which is
> what I thought.
>
*chuckle* You make me smile widely, thank you, I love you because you remind me of
myself when I was so strident and intolerant and full of myself. Before you write
back something angry I hasten to add that it is your RIGHT to feel the way you do
and you are completely CORRECT in your perception of me, for after all, it is your
perception and totally valid, yes?
>
> The physical body does. :) My soul, no. The current vehicle, yes in the
> sense that it cannot handle the strength inherent in some entities. I know
> because I've approached that threshhold.
Just curious, cannot the physical body transform when required? By saturating the
physical tissues with the necessary energy it would seem....hmmm again. Thoughts
of experiments.
> Or do you find it so wrong that
> others have disagreeing experiences and knowledge? We do live in two
> separate realities, remember?
How can something be "wrong"?
What makes you so certain we live in two separate realities?
by the way, what IS reality?
-Steve.
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.