To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/11/16 11:41
Subject: Re: [K-list] deities
From: Steve Salter
On 1999/11/16 11:41, Steve Salter posted thus to the K-list:
SmilingjaguarATnospamaol.com (Kimberly) wrote:
> > Just curious, how do you know there IS a unifying intelligence?
>
> The shamanically inclined have proof of their own. Personal experience, and
> with some of us, spirit teachers.
>
Personal, subjective "proof" is not admissable as evidence in the court of the
Cosmos but thanks for playing!
I could say I have "proof" that reincarnation exist because I have verified waking
dreams/visions of past lives through research and also experienced definitive
sensations of authenticity but I would not dream of trying to convince someone of
this. It is MY experience and thus, subjective.
> Finally, what does it matter?
>
> Knowing the truth of the universe matters nothing?
>
What is the truth of the universe?
>
> I cannot prove anything to YOU. That is very different from internal proof.
>
My point precisely! Thanks for the validation. Internal proof is totally valid to
the one who has experienced it.
>
> So is your non-faith and insistence that their is only you and me. Closing
> alot of doors there with one swoop....something I'm sure has pretty powerful
> effects.
>
Oopsie! You interpreted my words "ME" and "YOU" as meaning individuals. I was not
clear enough, sorry. We are individuals but we are also One, are we not? I can't
prove that but it feels good so I go with it. I don't close doors, I just don't
choose to dwell in a lot of the empty rooms some doors lead to.
>
> What, we're gonna start a tiny mailing list? I guess it depends on whether
> it annoys the others.
>
That is what I was trying to avoid but no one has complained yet so by all means,
let us continue! In fact, it has generated a lot of traffic and I expect "v" to
yell at me any moment for this fact.
hehe, just kidding "v".
> Actually, what I believe is dependent upon personal experience only. Bits
>
Those are the only beliefs to place faith in, I would agree.
>
> Some religions, yes. But I find my natural averson to the trappings and
> fierce independence mentally and spiritually to be great assets. All the
> systems are but ways to express divinity. Once you see that, you start
> finding some pretty interesting things.
>
Gee, you sound like me, how come we are arguing?
;)
>
> I focus on the me and the you, but I've got friends to fall back on. Just a
> thought. It's a Me and You concept taken to the ultimate level...between
> divinity and humanit.
So, is there a division between "divinity" and "humanity"...is there really?
P'raps reaching a point of realizing completely that a division does not need to
be drawn is what it takes to "ascend"?
Just a thought and maybe not a great thought at that, but its mine and that is
enough for me at the moment.
-Steve.
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b02662.html
|