Kundalini Gateway Email List Archives

line

To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/10/03 09:58
Subject: [K-list] Fwd: BOUNCE from [lobsteredjason1
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent


On 1999/10/03 09:58, Mystress Angelique Serpent posted thus to the K-list:

>From: owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
>Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 01:45:33 -0600 (MDT)
>To: owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
>Subject: BOUNCE kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net: Non-member submission from
[lobsteredjason1 <lobsteredjason1ATnospamnetscapeonline.co.uk>]
   Lobster hon, :) the list has spam-bots now.. your post bounces if you
don't post from the address you are subscribed by.. Good to see ya!

>Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 08:45:33 +0100
>From: lobsteredjason1 <lobsteredjason1ATnospamnetscapeonline.co.uk>
>Reply-To: arcATnospaminame.com
>To: kundalini-list <kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net>
>Subject: Re: [K-list] Fwd: BOUNCE from [lobsteredjason1
>Wim Borsboom wrote:
>
>> Dear everybody,
>> Lobster and myself have a bit of an email history,
>> Do not get shocked unduly... by our exchange.
>
>I must apologise but I truly have no conscious memory of this.
>
>
>> Dear Lobster Talk,
>>
>> You still alive..., not gotten lost or perished yet?
>
>Still alive. Partly lost, partly found, partly perished.
>
>
>> Good to hear from you again.
>
>Your postings on K are helpful and wholesome. I hope that continues.
>
>>
>> Can we finally communicate, at least try?
>
>Do you mean can I speak in a way that is acceptable to you?
>Or do you expect me to modify my non-communcation to a mode that accords
>with
>your preference? Or perhaps communication is already in progress . . .
>There is no need to try. I am happy to find a mode of communication that
>works
>- for who or what - ahhh . . .
>
>
>> Looks like you still don't wish to communicate, you still wish to reflect,
>> deflect, deform and warp?
>
>One way of looking at my lack of skill certainly. You might also realise
>that
>we all see what we wish. That people let in what they are able to and
>what may
>appear a deformation and warp may indeed be so, it may also be that the
>process of straightening existing deformations and warps is not always
>seen
>for what it is . . .
>Just as people who write in an open and gentle mode or appear very
>spiritual
>are in fact (pardon the term) snakes (I am not referring to you as your
>energy
>seems open and balanced at the moment). Similalry individuals who in
>outer
>form seem bitter and twisted may indeed be the medicine required . . .
>You see my friend - I agree that my communication is based on
>reflection,
>deflection, deformation and warping. It also has other intentions that
>are
>closer to your own easily construed motivations. Now if your intents are
>wholesome I am praising you (and myself also) but let us see how you
>straighten out my 'warping' . . .
>
>> You would not have quoted Ku-shan if you would have understood Ku-shan
>> Neither would I have... but then I do not understand Ku-shan
>> You would not have responded if you would have understood me
>> Neither would I have... but then I don't understand me-self
>
>Well my friend,
>It may be that I do not understand. And it may be that saying you 'do
>not
>understand' is a way of saying you *do* understand the teachings of
>Taoism.
>You understand well enough.
>
>
>>
>> >Ku-shan:
>> >"Sayings do not correspond to potential.
>> >Words do not set forth actualities.
>> >Those who accept words perish.
>> >Those who linger over sayings get lost.
>> >When you have caught the fish, you forget the trap.
>> >When you have gotten the meaning of the words, you forget the words.
>> >We use a net to catch fish; the fish are not the net."
>> >-- Ku-shan
>>
>> We will both get lost and perish, I suppose...
>> Seems that I don't want to understand this...would be the end of writing,
>> email, the whole shebang, internet, the web :->
>
>Perhaps.
>Fishing continues.
>
>
>> With love ;-)(-: and good humour :-)
>> Wim
>
>Seriously Lobster
>Be Well
>

 Mystress Angelique Serpent, http://www.domin8rex.com
  Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Officially the most beautiful city in the world.
8) :D ;) :0 :) ;P ;) :D |* ;) 8D :)
 <<<< I would rather live in a world where my life is surrounded by mystery
 <<<< than live in a world so small that my mind could comprehend it.
 <<<< -- Harry Emerson Fosdick


   

blank
DISCLAIMER!

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
blank
K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
line
  • Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
  • All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the at symbol symbol.
  • All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
  • This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
  • URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b01938.html