To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/10/02 12:45
Subject: [K-list] Fwd: BOUNCE from [lobsteredjason1
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent
On 1999/10/02 12:45, Mystress Angelique Serpent posted thus to the K-list:
>Subject: BOUNCE kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net: Non-member submission from
[lobsteredjason1 <lobsteredjason1ATnospamnetscapeonline.co.uk>
>Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:39:07 +0100
>From: lobsteredjason1 <lobsteredjason1ATnospamnetscapeonline.co.uk>
>Reply-To: arcATnospaminame.com
>Subject: Re: [K-list] INTENT
>lobsteredjason1 wrote:
>
>> Wim Borsboom wrote:
>>
>> > >A LOVING PERSON LIVES IN A LOVING WORLD
>> > >A HOSTILE PERSON LIVES IN A HOSTILE WORLD
>> > >EVERYONE YOU MEET IS YOUR MIRROR...
>> >
>> > Dear Skypod Moonbeam,
>> >
>> > You know, the above is recent, new-age gobbledegook.
>>
>> Dear Friend,
>> Is it? Perhaps you have not reflected deeply enough? :-)
>>
>> > This gobbledegook can make you laugh nervously.
>>
>> Can it. What else might it produce?
>>
>> > This gobbledegook can make you powerless.
>> > This gobbledegook can not set you free.
>>
>> ;-)
>> What would you recommend?
>>
>> > It is the current 'nouveau morality' of self-punishment.
>> > As guilt-ridden and judgement-driven as some old age religions.
>>
>> Is it? What world do you illustrate?
>>
>> > What you see in a mirror is a reflection, it is not you.
>>
>> No?
>> What is experienced as seeing is not seen by you either perhaps?
>>
>> > How you interpret that reflection is a reflection of how you were judged.
>>
>> Do you judge or interpret what you say as being correct? Is that of any
>> greater relevance? To whom?
>>
>> > The statement " EVERYONE YOU MEET IS YOUR MIRROR..."
>> > is flawed logic, lacks philosophical depth and is scientifically unsound.
>>
>> Flawed logic, lack of philosophical depth and an unscientific approach
>> work
>> for me.
>> Not in your reflective judgement?
>>
>> > Above all, it lacks compassion towards one-self and fellow human beings.
>> > Do not trip over this mirror metaphor.
>>
>> What is the nature of your compassion and trip?
>>
>> > Please, do not be unduly shocked.
>> > I tend to talk this way.
>>
>> Why?
>> Do you have a tendency or wish to 'unduly shock'.
>>
>> > See if you can figure it out.
>>
>> Figure? Is there something to figure out? Something to reflect on? Seems
>> transparent to me . . .
>>
>> Be Well
>> Lobster talk
>>
>> PS
>> Hi Kundalites . . .
>>
>> "Sayings do not correspond to potential. Words do not set forth
>> actualities. Those who accept words perish. Those who linger over
>> sayings get lost. When you have caught the fish, you forget the trap.
>> When you
>> have gotten the meaning of the words, you forget the words. We use a
>> net to
>> catch fish; the fish are not the net." -- Ku-shan
>
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b01927.html
|