To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/09/27 05:38
Subject: Returned Mail
From: Postmaster
On 1999/09/27 05:38, Postmaster posted thus to the K-list:
Unable to deliver this message for four days. The destination host is unreachable.
The first 100 lines of the original message...
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received: from null ([165.251.32.73])
by bftoemail9.bigfoot.com (Bigfoot Toe Mail v1.0
with message handle 990922_020241_2_bftoemail9_smtp;
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 02:02:41 -0500
for vanessastoeipoesATnospambigfoot.com
Received: from smv02-mc.iname.net
by ida.email.com (Version 1.06)
for <svjatoslavgavrilovATnospamemail.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 02:02:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from salmon.esosoft.net (salmon.esosoft.net [192.41.17.47])
by smv02-mc.iname.net (8.9.3/8.9.1SMV2) with ESMTP id CAA20580
for <svjatoslavgavrilovATnospamemail.com> sent by <owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 02:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (salmonATnospamlocalhost) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id XAA11149; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:59:57 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by salmon.esosoft.net (bulk_mailer v1.9); Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:59:54 -0600
Received: (salmonATnospamlocalhost) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id XAA11097; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:59:46 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from imo21.mx.aol.com (imo21.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.65]) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id XAA11087; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:59:43 -0600 (MDT)
From: KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
Received: from KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
by imo21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v22.4.) id dUDa004068 (4003);
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 01:59:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <d53714cd.2519ca30ATnospamaol.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 01:59:12 EDT
Subject: Re: [K-list] seemingly stupid questions about K
To: martinATnospamtucana.demon.co.uk, kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 10
Sender: owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
Reply-To: KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
X-Delivery: Mail.com IDA 1.06
In a message dated 9/21/99 1:56:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
martinATnospamtucana.demon.co.uk writes:
<< Whether this goes on to include the truly transcendent,
i.e., the Infinite, I am waiting to see! I have little idea what that
would be like, though, so how would I know when it has happened? >>
The classic dilemma! Theoretically there is only the threshold in and the
threshold out. At the point of unity there is no subject nor object. If
there is still a "you" having an experience then you are still in a
relational (i.e., relative) state, non-absolute. This is why one cannot
speak of having had an experience of emptiness: in emptiness there would be
no one to have the experience!
Sarva Mangalam!
James
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.