To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/09/20 19:36
Subject: Re: [K-list] seemingly stupid questions about K
From: Pokimontaz
On 1999/09/20 19:36, Pokimontaz posted thus to the K-list:
<<snips below this>>
Hmm are these the lines of thinking here....K melts the presedence we place
on external qualifyers of "self." We used to judge who we talked to and our
opinions on what a person had (a degree or gold teeth in is mouth) or what he
did (he stole a car and committed assault and battery)...eventually we see
that the person is more than those things. There is stuff that we cant see
that lies on the inside.
In myself through the years i have also notice a reduction in the inensity of
such egotistical feelings....i just have a feeling of not really caring about
any of that at all (okay well maybe the assault but thats cuz id rather not
be beat up any time soon :) but that is just me. A strong ego seems to me
like the claw that desperately clings to everything material in the world and
son finds out that there really is none at all.
LyN
<< > >It doesn't matter what the point is, it's a biological fact that the
grip
> >of ego will be weakened with awakening of k. It's not something you have
> >to do or strive for, it just happens.
> >
> I think that that is the way with integration: it just happens (perhaps
> when a certain amount of conscious and unconscious processing has been
> done on whatever issue it was that needed to be integrated).
I really don't understand what integrating the ego would mean. With what
will it be integrated? Ego is quite simply a feeling, or a collection of
feelings, in our head. And I have noticed the reduction in the intensity
of those ego-feelings. >>
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.