To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/09/05 07:14
Subject: Re: [K-list] Hello, K-list, and an announcement of my web pages
From: Shirley Williams
On 1999/09/05 07:14, Shirley Williams posted thus to the K-list:
dear ville:
my k experience has not had the sexual manifestations that others on the
k-list have and that may be related to being born k-active. my entire
experience has been one of spiritual awakening and inward journey. i have,
however, been conscious and rational on other planes of manifestation.
imho, i must agree with hillary that the statement that kundalini has
nothing to do with the feeling of orgasm is incorrect.
shirl (metro)
----- Original Message -----
From: <DruoutATnospamaol.com>
To: <vvainioATnospamtp.spt.fi>; <kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 1999 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [K-list] Hello, K-list, and an announcement of my web pages
> In a message dated 9/1/99 8:25:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
vvainioATnospamtp.spt.fi
> writes:
>
> << I have put some kundalini resources at my website,
> the address is http://www.tp.spt.fi/~vvainio/main.htm
> It might be slightly provocative, try to bear with that. I will take
> suggestions, additions etc. >>
>
> Dear Ville,
>
> You write on your site: Q: Does kundalini have anything to do with sex?
> A: No, it doesn't. Obviously people that forcefully supress their libido
can
> have some problems when some of their inhibitions fall apart, but this
should
> not be a concern for a "normal" people. The pleasant feeling given by
arousal
> of kundalini (or any kind of mystical experience) has definitely nothing
to
> do with pleasure felt during orgasm. Some people are just so preoccupied
with
> sex (or the fact that they aren't getting any) that they tend to associate
> everything with it. Most common effect on the sexual life is a slight
> decrease (or, at some stages, total annihilation) of libido. "
>
> ****************************
> Hillary here. You might want to reconsider your response. LOL. I don't
> know how you could have missed the sexual aspect of Gopi Krishna's
> experience. (Of course he did downplay it, and was reluctant to go into
> details).
>
> A poll was taken on this list some time ago (and I grant you these polls
are
> unscientific), asking, in part, whether people on the list felt the energy
as
> sexual. Of 22 replies to this question, 13 replied yes, 6 sometimes, and
3
> no . Eight of those who answered modified their yes question with
adjectives
> such as extremely very high, sexually ballistic etc.
>
> This is *very* important, IMO, because many people who become suddenly k
> active (esp. Christians) feel some guilt toward the sexual aspect of K.
> They don't want to equate spirituality and sex. But Kundalini isn't
called
> sexual energy for nothing. :))
>
> And to say that Kundalini "has definitely nothing to do with pleasure felt
> during orgasm." Is simply just plain wrong. I guess you have not (yet?)
> experienced the blissful orgasms of the whole body and brain. Instead of
> sexual repression, you might think in terms of sexual expansion.
>
> Enjoyed your website otherwise.
>
> Love, Hillary
>
>
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b01054.html
|