To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/09/02 15:23
Subject: Re: [K-list] Enlightened love
From: Fredaann
On 1999/09/02 15:23, Fredaann posted thus to the K-list:
>
> I am arguing for a personal relationship with the Being who IS love, not
> with
> the effects / symptoms (light beams, radiant heart, increased sensitivity
> and
> acceptance) of that Being.
I expect there will come a day that spirit will quit tickling me with
these,
maybe I really dont need the fun little tidbits - but they are fun, I am
fun,
life is just a tad bit more fun with with an occasional tickle.... who
am I
to deny spirt an opportunity for a good belly laugh, or a mystery?
I like to think these are also part of the discovery here as some of the
niffty
'little' things its possible to do even with the lowly and dreaded
'ughh' physical,
world. : ) only kidding I get a charge out of life just as it is...
puzzles are fun.
>There is something much more direct and personal
> possible, that I assert, if we truly know THAT, the rest of the semantics
> would
> fall away in such self-evident truth.
IMO the knowing of THAT should make us more 'free' to play the games of
the physical
while were here.... what if its your last time around? I want to be sure
I have
ridden on ALL the rides before the circus leaves town...
ego? maybe. Probably. but then I also think there must be a reason for
that ego.
Maybe to make sure I dont miss ALL this experience has to offer.
There just has to be something more
> personal for which we were designed than relating with enigmatic lights,
> energies, and entities.
well of corse there is.. there's puppies, making love and rainbows....
physical wonders manifestions that were created for your pleasure... by
you, for you.
>Something so incontrovertibly real that we know we
> belong.
Sit on the edge of the grand canyon, it made my chest near explode with
the wonder of how big an expression of love that is.
>Something that offers the possibility of this enlightened love of
> which
> you speak really living through us instead of trying to re-connect to some
> momentary past peak experience.
practice makes perfect. I have a tendancy to un-connect I suspose when I
am ready to
move on I wont dis-connect no more... until then, I am gonna keep right
on trying.
maybe dis-connect, re-connect isnt quite right, I dont think I am ever
really dis-connected, more like I just forget or wander
>Then loving becomes actually ego-less,
> because
> it is never about me as an ego but only about me as a conduit of it!
I am not there yet either, I still find myself unable to want to give
love to all,
and myself sometimes also.
Thats when those tickles come in handy...
spirits gentle, and sometimes not so gentle nudge to look deeper, yet
again.
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.