To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/08/11 13:15
Subject: [Fwd: [K-list] Secret Shame ..... [Maureen]]
From: Maureen Heffernan
On 1999/08/11 13:15, Maureen Heffernan posted thus to the K-list:
Return-Path: <wynterATnospambigpond.com>
Received: from teapot32.domain8.bigpond.com (teapot32.domain8.bigpond.com [139.134.5.180])
by main.mhonline.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA00517
for <morlightATnospammhonline.net>; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:34:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by teapot32.domain8.bigpond.com (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id da006425 for <morlightATnospammhonline.net>; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:32:45 +1000
Received: from DP-A01-pool-45.tmns.net.au ([139.134.132.45]) by mail8.bigpond.com (Claudes-Self-Aware-MailRouter V2.4d 17/54696); 12 Aug 1999 09:32:45
Message-ID: <027b01bee452$24d5dfc0$2d84868bATnospamchristow>
Reply-To: "Christopher Wynter" <wynterATnospambigpond.com>
From: "Christopher Wynter" <wynterATnospambigpond.com>
To: <morlightATnospammhonline.net>
References: <19990811221132.42769.qmailATnospamhotmail.com> <01fb01bee449$b6cd3580$2d84868bATnospamchristow> <37B1CA02.1AEB9EB4ATnospammhonline.net>
Subject: Re: [K-list] Secret Shame ..... [Maureen]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:34:56 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
> There is also a very large group of
> women who have long ago broken the chain .,,,"> which can be shown to be
> > repeated
> > in form every year of life until death ...
yes, I agree, and this is what my work is about ... breaking that chain of
genetic imprints ... the important thing (for me) is making it real enough in
the body to change the mtDNA ... which is only passed on by female (to both male
and female offspring)
acceptance of the male (repressed side of the female) and the awakening of K
allows this to take place ...
> I am living proof. Here's a scenario,(instead of blaming Mom for "baking
> the cake",)let me do it this way. My bio mom didn't want me.Yeah she was
> my incubator but how bout dear ol dad. Let's say I remember his
> infrequent visits where he would instill terror in my mom and the rest
> of the siblings. So much so that if mom ever had a moment when she did
> accept the pregnancy and my tiny feet popping at her from inside
> well,dad's deep booming voice would send every cell in her body to
> adrenalin rush for survival. So I equate his drunken visits with, never
> relax,always be on guard against the male potential killer. The male or
> daddy will so upset this incubator that I will die. He does not want me,
> nor does he want my mom. Oh no he is beating and going to kill my
> brothers and sisters.Dad is the real cause of death.
I know about this too ... and behind every male that i have ever worked with,
the issues were similar ... what was dad's childhood like that made him like
that in the first place ...
and the child in utero feels the conflict between mother and father ...
This may be a little off the point, but I have had a lot of coincidence with
this sort of behaviour associated with war trauma ... we have statistics that
show there is a disproportionately high incidence of this sort of behaviour
associated with returned servicemen compared with those who did not have
military service ... (more on this if you want it ..)
> I propose that this is not an infrequent ocurrance. I propose that it
> is learned behaviour and reaction inside the womb and carries through in
> every cell of many little girls who grow in this world.
> This is another half to what you are saying. Wonder if that fear of
> males is passed on?
absolutely correct ... and just in understanding the 'mechanics' of how it is
passed on can help some people come to grips with how this affects their lives
...
and the understanding also helps remove the blame ...
I feel that it is important to recognise here that the mtDNA influence is most
direct from grandmother ... not necessarily mother ... that mother provides then
environment for the activation of the grandmother's genetic legacy ... so it's
no-one's fault ...
This fear of male by female is also passed on by mother to son ... and it
saddens me that there are so many mothers who don't want a male child ...
because the male child in utero knows this ... and this is their first rejection
... and from my experience, one of the sources of homosexuality ...
Unfortunately, for many, the male is not 'allowed' to seek help to understand
his behaviour .... and where it comes from ... the males in my groups who have
been down this path also have had their whole outlook changed towards women by
their understanding of their mother's fears ...
> There is so much to it I just get tired of Mom being held accountable
> alone. It does not appear to be a balanced analysis.
Does what I have written help balance the analysis ... if not, I can provide
more ... this is not an attack on women ... it is about the power of woman to
change the world for the children of the future by changing their own
unconscious beliefs ... and changing the environment by which the genetic belief
is triggered ....
neither male nor female is 'wrong' or to 'blame' ... but if we can go beyond our
need to defend a particular perspective, then possibilities can be seen ... and
the choices made from more than one possibility ...
Christopher ....
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.