To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/05/14 03:54
Subject: [K-list] Reiki and Kundalini, debate
From: Amanda Erhart
On 1999/05/14 03:54, Amanda Erhart posted thus to the K-list:
On Fri, 14 May 1999 11:18:06 Chris Hughes wrote:
>Our debates ( every list conversation) from my point of view are
>educational but open to miss- understanding because we are not face
>to face so most of the subelties (Dyslexic attack)which make up
>language are lost, so such communications aer wide open to
>miss-understanding.
Chris,
was it you who said that even 80% of written
communication is conveyed by assumption in the
reader / recipient of the message in the Satsangh ?
I found that very intriguing and I can clearly see
your point.
The forum of online debate is not the best as it does
not allow for face to face communication and body
language, which makes up a lot of communication as
well. :)
>So from my point of veiw the content of the conversations in a
>spritual list matter not one whit and in fact I am sure that God
>smiles at our child like atempts to explain Him/Her with the sure
>knowledge that our point of view is the correct one.
:) Nice idea.
>Yet what I believed yesterday is not necessarilly what I believe
>today so I no longer feel that I have to defend my ego.
>I am also aware that every bit of knowledge I have was allready in
>existence before my birth, it came through other people, books, with
>a little intuiting of my own but even then I only discovered what was
>there allready.
That is true ! :)
Makes you think whether man has changed anything over
the last 10 000 years. In some ways not. :)
I suspect we use thought modes that were around 25 000
years ago.
>What does matter is "intention"
>My intention is to love others unconditionally to the >best of my ability
Chris, I think this is an incredibly valid and
humble intention and even better of you to state
online. :)
Thanks for the reminder. :)
>> Also, if they are the same, then there is no need to make any difference
>> between Reiki and Kundalini.
I must admit I have been curious about the answers
to these questions myself.
>most
>definately since being atuned in Reiki the chanel up my spine is more
>open and the movement that I physically feel of Kundalini is much
>stronger.
Do you feel K move when you use Reiki to heal ppl ?
Does it feel like the same ?
(These are just questions born out of a curious ego,
they're not meant as rhetorical questions to argue)
>Once Kundalini is awakened you have very little free choice.
>Kundalini is in charge of your life You are in the taxi home being
>driven by Kundalini Shakti. So now I believe that everything else is
>almost immaterial.
Did Reiki cause K awakening for you or was it the
other way around, you started with Reiki because
K was present ?
>If we were to have a "debate" you might well win through superior
>logic intelligence etc but the bottom line is all you have won is the
>debate it does not guarantee that you are right or I >wrong.
Shall we debate on that ? ;)
I suppose someone already did a long and learned
debate about that in one of the debating socities
or rhetoric clubs in ancient Greece... ;)
Best regards,
Amanda.
Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.