To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/05/06 21:31
Subject: Re: [K-list] Scratches
From: gopalan n.s.
On 1999/05/06 21:31, gopalan n.s. posted thus to the K-list:
Dear Mr.LeTeegee,
Let me wish you a happy birthday. Let you reach where you ought to get to.
Thanks for your comments.
I wish I remain a Scratch and while in "K" not even that.
Small Scratch.....Knows something
Big Scratch.......Knows nothing
No Scratch........Knows(He is) everything
With love,
Gopal
>From: LeTeegeeATnospamaol.com
>Reply-To: LeTeegeeATnospamaol.com
>To: KundaliniATnospamlist-server.net
>Subject: [K-list] Scratches
>Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:17:47 EDT
>
>In a message dated 5/5/99 7:50:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>gopalannATnospamhotmail.com writes:
>
> > Dear mr.LeGeegee,
>
>Good Morning Sunshine! It's my birthday today, so I ask that only
>presents,
>not past, be sent. I love presents!
>
>
> > Thanks for reacting.
>
>You are most welcome.
>
> >The concept of scratches is based on a very high
> > philosophy of life. Its really unfortunate you have taken the meaning
> > literally to mean the scratch-in the physical sense to scratch your
>body
> > parts when itching.
>
>I am sorry you saw my post as an attack on your words and philosophy. It
>clearly... or should that be unclearly (apparently)... was meant to lighten
>up, rather than darken down. It is also apparent that both of us took
>each
>others posts literally!
>
> >Here the scratch is used as a defence mechanism against
> > the EGO in one's life. EGO acts as an obstacle and mental block in
> > spiritual development.
>
>Hey, tell me about it. How does one know when it is ego reacting (our own
>or
>another's)? As I love to communicate, I do not want anyone to think when
>I
>respond to a post, that it was meant as an offense.
>
> >One must assume a position he knows very very little
> > and many a time is ignorant of truth of life.
>
>If we do that, then how can we take what anyone says seriously?
>
> I know VERY little. So I take words said literally and have fun with
>them
>instead! If I took your words seriously, I would be in a state of
>knowing,
>which then leads me to not knowing if I remain open-minded. Unless of
>course, I disagreed with your words, then I would be in a state of not
>knowing your words and my own knowing (which is VERY little), and then must
>again seek the Truth. (whew) It's much easier for me to just remember to
>laugh!
>
> >Then only he improves.
>
>Agreed. You are very wise.
>
> > Probably you must of heard of 'ZERO EGONESS STATE" which means the
>highest of Spiritual achievement "Self Realisation" according to Ramana
>Maharshi, a
> great Indian Saint.
>
>I have never heard about it. I would be interested in hearing about it, as
>I've only heard the most wonderful things about Ramana Maharshi.
>
>Thank you for comments and communication back to me!
>
>Much Love,
>xxxtg
>
>* Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult *
>
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.