To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/05/05 18:45
Subject: Re: [K-list] Scratches
From: Leteegee
On 1999/05/05 18:45, Leteegee posted thus to the K-list:
In a message dated 5/5/99 5:33:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
love_rikATnospamyahoo.com writes:
> Happy Birthday, T, gee... I can't afford to spare a second
> second, but I'll grant you a future, which will be a present
> by the time you get it.
Got it! Thanks...
> Hmm... maybe that's why everyone laughs at my posts...
Not me; I take them very seriously. :-|
> Maybe I should just randomly assume a position
> and meditate in it and see what arises. Sooner or
> later, someone is bound to take 'me' seriously,
> cuz that's karma.
I will take 'you' seriously. :-|
Later is noWhere.
>
> > I know VERY little.
>
> What's that supposed to mean? (i'm confused.)
It means you are confused.
> > So I take words said literally and have fun with them instead!
>
> Do you mean that you take said-words literally, and have fun,
> or that you take 'words-said-literally' and have fun,
> or that you have fun literally 'taking words' (you thief).
I literally said (b). But I lied. I am taking you seriously. :-|
This post only though.
> Just curious. I do all of the above, except for the fun part,
> which is left as an exercise for the reader.
Curious and confused... sounds like a signed letter to Ann Landers.
> > If I took your words seriously, I would be in a state of
> > knowing, which then leads me to not knowing if I remain
> > open-minded.
>
> Ohhh... so is THAT why you never take me seriously,
Never say never. :-|
> b/c you think you would learn something and therefore
> 'know'?
It is no longer true what I knew before. Now I don't know.
>Maybe if you took my 'jokes' and 'insights'
> and so-called 'wisdom' seriously, you might see that
> *I'm* the one who's asking for someone to realign
> my damaged head.
I am taking you seriously now. :-|
Let me take a look at the damage.
(looking at head)
(doing some realignment)
There, all done.
Better than new.
> :) Of course not picking on you, TeeGee,
Of course not. It never crossed my serious mind. :-|
>b/c I see that you 'know' this, and are not frightened by my
> use of 'scare quotes'.
You are right. :-|
> > Unless of course, I disagreed with your words, then I would
> > be in a state of not knowing your words and my own knowing
> > (which is VERY little), and then must again seek the Truth.
>
> "Why would you do that?" -NNR (not necc. rhetorical)
Gives me something to do when the soaps aren't on. :-|
> > (whew) It's much easier for me to just remember to laugh!
>
> Yes, for us bubbleheads it certainly is...
> But don't you ever get the urge to take on the challenge
> of putting yourself totally in the mind of the writer,
> seeing what they see, writing what they write, and
> noticing that from their angle in the universe,
> everything they say is exactly correct!
No. :-|
I go straight to the last line you wrote when I can remember.
When I can't, I tell you what I know. :-|
> Or not?
> Maybe there's an easier way than 'being psychic'?
I have a hunch and 'feel' you are right.
> Why would anyone ever want to be called 'wise'...
Try telling that to the Three Wise Men.
It would be a whole different story.
> It's such a patronizing response that seems to say
> "Thank you for writing, ________.
> I have reviewed your opinion and have received
> much insight regarding _______________________.
> Unfortunately I do not have the time to introspect
> and help you out in removing your expressed issues.
> Best wishes. Love and light, _______________."
If you say so. :-|
> > * Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult *
>
> I love you too, Teegee..., Rik
>
> * A Dolt Disguised As A Clever Response *
Best Wishes
Love AND Light,
xxxtg
* I'm already visualizing the duct tape over your mouth *
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.