To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/05/05 14:34
Subject: Re: [K-list] Scratches
From: Rik Wallace
On 1999/05/05 14:34, Rik Wallace posted thus to the K-list:
--- LeTeegeeATnospamaol.com wrote:
> Good Morning Sunshine! It's my birthday today, so I ask that
> only presents, not past, be sent. I love presents!
Happy Birthday, T, gee... I can't afford to spare a second
second, but I'll grant you a future, which will be a present
by the time you get it.
> How does one know when it is ego reacting (our own or
> another's)? As I love to communicate, I do not want anyone
> to think when I respond to a post, that it was meant as an
> offense.
Well I know *I* don't think when I respond to your posts.
No offense, but I'd rather laze about and do nothing
and 'leave it to the bottom' as Angelique says, which works
out fine, as my ego likes to show off and tell people
that he's related to me, when in fact, he's adopted.
> >One must assume a position he knows very very little
> > and many a time is ignorant of truth of life.
>
> If we do that, then how can we take what anyone says
> seriously?
Hmm... maybe that's why everyone laughs at my posts...
Maybe I should just randomly assume a position
and meditate in it and see what arises. Sooner or
later, someone is bound to take 'me' seriously,
cuz that's karma.
> I know VERY little.
What's that supposed to mean? (i'm confused.)
> So I take words said literally and have fun with them instead!
Do you mean that you take said-words literally, and have fun,
or that you take 'words-said-literally' and have fun,
or that you have fun literally 'taking words' (you thief).
Just curious. I do all of the above, except for the fun part,
which is left as an exercise for the reader.
> If I took your words seriously, I would be in a state of
> knowing, which then leads me to not knowing if I remain
> open-minded.
Ohhh... so is THAT why you never take me seriously,
b/c you think you would learn something and therefore
'know'? Maybe if you took my 'jokes' and 'insights'
and so-called 'wisdom' seriously, you might see that
*I'm* the one who's asking for someone to realign
my damaged head.
:) Of course not picking on you, TeeGee, b/c I see
that you 'know' this, and are not frightened by my
use of 'scare quotes'.
> Unless of course, I disagreed with your words, then I would
> be in a state of not knowing your words and my own knowing
> (which is VERY little), and then must again seek the Truth.
"Why would you do that?" -NNR (not necc. rhetorical)
> (whew) It's much easier for me to just remember to laugh!
Yes, for us bubbleheads it certainly is...
But don't you ever get the urge to take on the challenge
of putting yourself totally in the mind of the writer,
seeing what they see, writing what they write, and
noticing that from their angle in the universe,
everything they say is exactly correct!
Or not?
Maybe there's an easier way than 'being psychic'?
> >Then only he improves.
>
> Agreed. You are very wise.
Why would anyone ever want to be called 'wise'...
It's such a patronizing response that seems to say
"Thank you for writing, ________.
I have reviewed your opinion and have received
much insight regarding _______________________.
Unfortunately I do not have the time to introspect
and help you out in removing your expressed issues.
Best wishes. Love and light, _______________."
> Thank you for comments and communication back to me!
Naturally.
> Much Love,
> xxxtg
>
> * Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult *
I love you too, Teegee..., Rik
* A Dolt Disguised As A Clever Response *
_________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free ATnospamyahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.