To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/02/14 08:53
Subject: Re: [K-list] "understandings"
From: Constance Ashworth
On 1999/02/14 08:53, Constance Ashworth posted thus to the K-list:
Dear Llewellyn,
I believe we are all, metaphorically, crystals wherein we can peer out from
whichever facet we choose, viewing others and their intentions in various
lights, depending upon our choice. I see that Hillary's intention was not
to validate or invalidate how things seem to you, based on whether or not
you are intellectualizing or not. She may, however, be intrigued by how our
being processes and integrates all the information and I believe she was
only seeking data when she made her query to you.
We may have been judged and taught to doubt ourselves in the past. Once we
awaken to know that what was in our hearts all along is true and real and
how beautiful we are in our uniqueness, it hurts all the more to realize
we had allowed others in the past to cause us to doubt our truth, to doubt
we we have a special contribution.
Llewellyn your contribution is uniquely yours, it is beautiful, it CANNOT be
replaced and we (the world) would be missing out if you didn't share it just
as you are experiencing it.
>From my heart,
Connie
-----Original Message-----
From: Llewellyn <ljonesATnospamzlink.net>
To: DruoutATnospamaol.com <DruoutATnospamaol.com>
Cc: Klist <KundaliniATnospamList-Server.net>
Date: Saturday, February 13, 1999 4:10 PM
Subject: RE: [K-list] "understandings"
> IN response to my post about "understandings" Hillary asks:
>
>
>> Are these the "understandings" that come to you out of your K
>> experiences or
>> "Intellectual" understandings that you formulate after the fact?
>> Which are
>> which??? :))
>>
>> Love, Hillary
>
>
>Hillary and list;
>
> Regarding my list of 'understandings' - are these just products of my
>meager intellect - I do not know - if they ring true; then so be it, if
>they seem like garbage, then so be it - I was only trying to add what seem
>like understandings to me - Not all occurred during high k - number 1 was
a
>big deal to me during my k awakening as was 1b. I suppose all of them at
>least partially represent where I am at, right now - and are not
>inconsistent in any great extent from any "understandings" I felt when I
was
>vibrating the most. (if that is a reasonable way to phrase that)- Should I
>hide in shame for daring to say such blasphemy?
>
> I suppose these can be considered just products of the intellect if one
>wants; - to me in that state we tap into larger reservoirs of thought -
>however, that doesn't necessary mean that it is valid or invalid - just
like
>channeled material, everything must be carefully evaluated. - And as I
>suggest everything written in any book or in any form whatsoever must be
>passed through a sieve a questioning phase - Is this right? (unless - you
>have the magic decoder and can pick out the "Simon says - " encrypted
within
>the message. Everybody must weigh the thoughts in their own consciousness
>to feel if it seems right, does it ring true to them. This seemed like a
>Truth to me at the time and still does - sorry. - At least that is the way
>it seems to me - that is my understanding and My understanding says
>question - especially question anybody who says "I understand
>......................" - so certainly question this ---- and any place
>where I do not add adequate caveats around my words.
>
> And sometimes I play the devil's advocate - rarely do I directly indicate
>"Simon says". Just kidding - - oh to be a kid again.
>
> more than enough said by me on this: and i thought that I was adding some
>balance - so much for the teeter-totter - so much for thought <<|>>
>Llewellyn.
>
>
>
>
>
>
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.