1998/06/07 18:06
kundalini-l-d Digest V98 #434
kundalini-l-d Digest Volume 98 : Issue 434
Today's Topics:
Re: Ownership [ Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpent ]
Re: a vote for not moving the list [ Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpent ]
2nd anniversary [ "frans" <fransATnospamtelebyte.nl> ]
Re: metaphors: astral flight, past l [ Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpent ]
Re: nameless spirit having a human e [ Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpent ]
Re: Pornotherapy Online (was Barbie) [ Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpent ]
Re: Who is not an Avatar?:--) [ Harsha1MTMATnospamaol.com ]
Re: Who is not an Avatar?:--) (Harsh [ Avatar Thyer <thyerATnospamfreenet.grfn.or ]
RE: a vote for not moving the list [ "jb" <hc19436ATnospamautovia.com> ]
RE: Surely! [ "jb" <hc19436ATnospamautovia.com> ]
RE: i am?? [ "jb" <hc19436ATnospamautovia.com> ]
Re: i am?? [ Mary Ezzell <maryATnospamsonic.net> ]
The 5th Thunder???? [ sassiATnospamworldnet.att.net (Jack) ]
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 13:28:27 -0700
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpentATnospamdomin8rex.com>
To: "Paul West" <paulATnospamstationone.demon.co.uk>
Cc: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: Ownership
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980607132827.01d6e5b0ATnospamdomin8rex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 05:37 PM 07/06/98 +0000, Paul West wrote:
If it is crap to
>you, delete it. If you choose to use it, use it, as a simple resource.
>It is nothing more. Stop vying for pesonal attention or affirmation of
>personal ownership. It is personal if you make it personal. Otherwise
>it is directed at nobody. Get used to it.
>
>Cor, I can smell a real eggy fart coming in my window. Excuse me.
>
As a Shaman, I would say that was a comment on your writing from All
that Is.. No accidents. eh?? A gift of Goddess to guide you on your path.
The odor of sulphur and brimstone, eh?? heh heh..
BB, A.
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 13:22:44 -0700
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpentATnospamdomin8rex.com>
To: Danijel Turina <sinisa.turinaATnospamzg.tel.hr>
Cc: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Subject: Re: a vote for not moving the list
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980607132244.01d76930ATnospamdomin8rex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dr. friggin' Shukula's subscription goes down regularly.. it is an
Internet radio account, or something.. often not available to send mail for
a few days at a time.. it's just a bounce report.. delete and ignore. You
mail is getting thru to everyone else on the list. No worries..
If you need more info, feel free to write to me at
kundalini-l-ownerATnospamexecpc.com
Love and electric blue K. fire, List Mystress.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Website <http://www.execpc.com/~libra/kund/kundgate.htm>
in europe <http://www.telebyte.nl/~frans/kundalini/>
**Unsubbing: http://aloha.net/~bpeay/kundalini/unsubscribe.html
To leave the list send a post with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject header to
<KUNDALINI-L-REQUESTATnospamEXECPC.COM> for the List and
<KUNDALINI-L-D-REQUESTATnospamEXECPC.COM> for the List Digest.
The posting address for both lists is <KUNDALINI-LATnospamEXECPC.COM>
PLEASE!! Don't send text or image attachments to this address.
List Archives from 26/12/96 thru Reference.COM
http://www.reference.com/cgi-bin/pn/listarch?list=KUNDALINI-LATnospamexecpc.com
If you do *NOT* want your post archived include <X-No-Archive: yes>
as an email header or as the first line of your message.
*******************************
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 00:54:30 +100
From: "frans" <fransATnospamtelebyte.nl>
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: 2nd anniversary
Message-Id: <199806072250.AAA18925ATnospamdegas.telebyte.nl>
Beloved List, writing tonight to Mystress i suddenly remembered we
are one year older.... thanks Mystress for taking care. And thanks
everybody for contributing to my life. Frans.
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 96 10:34:00 -0500
kundalini-l-d Digest Volume 96 : Issue 1
Today's Topics:
[1]: Welcome to the kundalini list
[2]: Fwd: kundalini awakening
[3]: Re: kundalini awakening
[1]:
From: Richard Satin <libraATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Welcome to the kundalini list
Dear Charter Member,
Welcome. This is the first message to the new kundalini list. As of
now, the list is fully operational. To send posts, mail to
kundalini-lATnospamexecpc. com For administration (subscribe/unsubscribe),
kundalini-l-requestATnospamexecpc.com If you have problems or questions,
kundalini-l-ownerATnospamexecpc.com
-Richard
kundalini-l-ownerATnospamexcecpc.com
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 16:04:07 -0700
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpentATnospamdomin8rex.com>
To: Mary Ezzell <maryATnospamsonic.net>
Cc: <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Re: metaphors: astral flight, past lives
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980607160407.01d60c30ATnospamdomin8rex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 11:33 AM 06/06/98 -0700, Mary Ezzell wrote:
>Angelique wrote:
>> With regards to astral travelling, it is something everybody does
>>naturally, but folks think it has to be more complicated than it really is.
>
>The cords and flying sound like a lot more fun. To lift off slowly and
>float up like a cloud and look down on the roof, etc etc. TAking teh scenic
>route. Wish I could slow it down to that.
then do. Imagine what you look like from above.. or slow the focus by
taking someone else along. The first time I saw the cords and stuff, I
hadda "date" to pick up an online friend in the astral and take him on a
trip.. I took him to Gaia's fiery heart, then looked back and saw all these
"eggs on strings".. I had accidentally pulled my slaves along with me. I
left them to "incubate" in Gaia's heart while I pulled my friend out to
dance in the starfields.. he was asleep at the time, he got sketchy
memories from dreams.
>Wish I could just go drift around surveying things. The other is like
>teleporting straight to a pre-selected place, rather dull.
We are always guided.. where do you wanna drift to? Pick a sunny
afternoon and a comfy hammock, and let your mind wander.
> in your
>>imagination, you really are "going" there in the astral.. but it is all
>>within you. You are bigger than you think.
>
>Makes sense. There was something like that in a Piers Anthony fantasy book.
> A magic potion or somethign that made you get as big and hazy as a cloud,
>with one foot in New York and one in Florida. Then you decided where you
>wanted to be, and stood on that foot, and shrank.
I find SF fantasy to be a good metaphor for magic workings.. it is so,
exactly.. I am all that is, being one bit of self at a time, depending on
my focus of attention in the moment.
>
>> Likewise, the idea of "past lives" is also an illusory metaphor.
>This makes a lot of sense with a lot of therapy etc. But I've had memories
>and reunions etc that checked out closer to the traditional idea, that some
>'past lives' are really closer to this life in practical terms than others.
><...> ... but there's a level where it's more convenient to take
>it at face value.
Yes, it is easier to explain that way.. but the past lives are real..
they are carefully chosen to resonate with current issues. They can be
proven, in a linear form.. but linearity and time do not exist outside of
our memories, which eventually splinter into infinity.
If you go looking, you can find "future lives", too.. I suspect
sometimes, that may be what the grey alien is.. a future self so unhappy
with it's evolution that it travels back thru time to attempt to change the
course of it's own history.
The history of the "zetas" sez they destroyed their planet with
pollution, greed and war and were forced to genetically adapt themselves to
live underground.. and they blamed their fate on emotions, so they used
their science to erase emotions.. now they are at a place where they have
mastered space-time and are barely physical.. but they cannot evolve
higher, and so are dying out coz they have lost the ability to love.
>/snip/
>> We get the type of metaphor we ask for.. I adjusted my programming a bit
>>recently, and so now it gives me novel and movie metaphors instead, which
>>are not so confusing as past lives.
>
>Right. Sort out the emotional metaphor stuff from the practical (if any :-).
>
>Still, the metaphor may be putting on too many limits. "My bamboo tea
>plantation was from a past life, so it's probably not still there, so no
>point in looking for it." Etc.
Nothing is lost, in eternity. It is all in the Now. It is inside of you.
Blessings, Mystress
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 15:41:05 -0700
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpentATnospamdomin8rex.com>
To: Mary Ezzell <maryATnospamsonic.net>
Cc: <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Re: nameless spirit having a human experience
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980607154105.01d64d20ATnospamdomin8rex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 11:33 AM 06/06/98 -0700, Mary Ezzell wrote:
>Thanks for sharing this!!!
Thanks you too!!
>
>At 03:26 PM 6/3/98 -0700, Angelique wrote:
>
>> I was born awakened, and at this place where I manifest now I know myself
>>to be nameless spirit having a human experience. That which I thought I
>>was, splintered one day
>
>When? What was going on in your life at that time? Did you have career etc
>decisions to make, or could you just drift and let the spiritual stuff
>happen and decide worldly stuff later?
Hmmm.. not that long ago in years.. I had already set myself up as
pro-dom, to have room for spirituality in my life and be free of some
economic pressures.. Goddess had it handled.. I had begun delving more
deeply into sacred sexuality, I had already set up "The Tribe of the Fire
Serpent" to meet others of my kind.. and I had been experimenting with the
faces in the mirror... and with psychedelic shamanism which make them
clearer.
A grey alien showed up, which caused me to re-evaluate my refusal to look
at "starchild" and contactee books more closely.. channelling it taught me
things I did not know the human body was capable of.. then came the "I AM"
experience I wrote of recently, .. the ego splintering came out of my
trying to find a name for it. Instead of finding a name for the nameless
infinite, the name I bore, and the illusion of MY Ego was eaten by it.
Shattered
>
>> into infinite shards of moments and events, of
>>memories that were an illusion of the past.. and I realized that every
>>moment of my life had happened to a different persons..
>
>Right!
>
>> and infinity of persons
>
>Right! Some scripture says it too, that each thought is a separate person,
>who never appears again.
Yes. It happened about a month after I joined K-list, I think.. the
person who helped me thru it I had met at the last Fire Serpent event ..
Sept 96. My Fijian Princess starchild..
>In the meantime, on the way to that ... I sometimes find a stage where I
>feel like a 'nameless spirit' who is too small and pure to have any
>attributes at all. 'A disembodied point of view', as someone said. A tiny
>little spark or star that moves through the various identities.... As
>through a carnival fun-house....
Yes! The way I see it, on the other side of unity is
multidimensionality.. being nothing, I can be anything. Thus, in my work I
manifest the Fem divinity inside of my clients so they may surrender to it.
I am manifesting a mirror of who they are, so they may give love to
themselves. Being that object of worship they need. From that place, I am
a mouthpiece for their own unconscious, and for their own heart voice..
and I am awed and amazed at the miracles of transformation that move thru
me at those times. It is blissful.
Blessings, Mystress.
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 15:13:21 -0700
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpentATnospamdomin8rex.com>
To: "Ed Arrons" <eeaATnospamaug.com>
Cc: <kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Pornotherapy Online (was Barbie)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980607151321.01d6acc0ATnospamdomin8rex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
<X-No-Archive: yes>
At 08:42 PM 06/06/98 -0400, Ed Arrons wrote:
>Dear Ann, Sharon, Jack and all who contributed to 'Barbie'.
>
> I must confess my own righteous indignation and anger
>upon reading the "Barbie post". Did anyone else experience
>such a reaction?
No. My reaction was pure laughter of spirit at the incongruity of it
appearing on the K-list. Perhaps most especially in the way that I edit my
own posts to make them more palatable to the K-list community..
Dunno about your daughter, but at age 12 I was sneaking my brother's
Hustler magazines to read.. most intrigued by the joyful hedonistic quality
of the sex.. it was interesting because it was forbidden, and because it
was an attitude so very different than that imposed by RC morality.
However, it did eventually lead my curiosity into some
experiences/situations that I quickly regretted when the reality didn't
match the magazines.. I quickly realized my emotional immaturity. I was a
pretty precocious kid tho, I don't blame hustler for my experiences. It was
the repression surrounding it that made it so interesting..
>My 13 year old daughter reads my email and
>we are quite open with each other. Up to now there was little
>to hide, but I would not have wanted her to read that one. I
>would not want her exposed to the sickness of pornography,
Such violent judgments.. this is your own sexual repression speaking.
You think pornography dangerous..what is it you fear from Barbie's words,
that you think she has such power to harm you??
>since it can be very contagious. Yes, indeed! (pained smile)
Kundalini is also contagious.. and it is sexual energy.. life itself is
a sexually communicated disease.. it is where we all come from.
>Ann wrote:
>It leaves me wondering why anyone thinks Barbie HAD a K
>awakening.
Yes, Barbie is not on the list.. just a stray bit 'o spam that wandered
on in out of the cold so we could dissect it for our edification.
More flesh for our ravenous appetites..:p
>If Barbie, male or female, is in business, it's a sick business and
>should be viewed as any illness, with understanding rather than
>with condemnation or denial. And the symptoms, which retard
>the awakening of kundalini, is in good part the view of self as
>being a separate object, further exacerbated in that the the self
>is also viewed in parts: "wow, what an ass! what a pair of tits!
Whew, whose thoughts are these?? Do you think your dick is out to get you
and sabotage your awakening?? Who sez porn retards Kundalini?? I find no
conflict with being a Shaktipat Mystress and a BDSM pornographer.
Acts of love and pleasure serve Goddess.. and it is not for me to judge
the love languages it is expressed in.. an it harm none.. Honestly, in my
path of learning to give love and acceptance to darkness, I trolled places
as diverse as Castrating feminist fantasies of the torture and murder of
child abusers, POW camp medical experiment fantasies, stories of humans
being made into animals or machines by force.. .. well, I'll skip the rest
of the list.. you get the idea..
These things are not to my tastes, but I made myself look at them and
into them, and all of the struggle of love-hate-fear they represent, life
itself.. love and fear and sex and death.. the fascination that makes us
slow down to look at a car accident.. until all my horrified judgments
drained away into peace of higher understanding
My version of dancing in the cremation ground.. and compared to those
extremes, I am on the "middle path"..
Barbie by comparison was as fresh and sweet as a cheerleader's giggle.
My annoyance came from it being spam.. and porn spam is the most virulent
because it is the most plentiful and the biggest threat to free speech on
the net.. precisely coz repressed folks react to it with the violence equal
to that which they used to manifest their own repression.. throwing stones
at Mary Magdalene..
It's all about what somebody else needs, and those dangerous good
intentions.
For myself, this whole thing has been a validation of a sneaking feeling
I have been having, that the spam that gets thru is a specific gift from
Goddess, to provoke issues and the spell hasn't really failed at all..:)
simply the manifestation of the tag line."or something even better in the
highest good of all" that I append to all my workings coz limitless
creativity can do anything better than my limited brain can conceive of.
After all, who is Barbie?? She is the idealized sex goddess partner
duality of the male who wrote of her.. she is young, fertile, voluptuous,
beautiful, unconditionally loving, utterly accepting of male sexual energy
with open arms, mouth, legs.. she is a submissive temple priestess, the
sacred prostitute of another age.. She is a dream-Goddess of fem
acceptance of male sexuality... on which much of the precarious male ego
rests.. She is the cheerleader who scorned Mr. Geek to go out with the
Football Captain.. she is the reward for male success, the jewel on the arm
of the exec.. the prize doe that is the reward for success in the head
butting and clashing antlers of male competition.
How men see women is and always will be different from how women see
themselves..
I see this especially working with cross dressers.. their attempts to be
feminine is an act of adoration of the feminine... imitation is the
sincerest form of flattery, but poor imitation is more like unkind satire..
cross dressers and trans gendered folks are not women.. they are a male
idea of what women are. Like the pop diva RuPaul is not a woman, but a male
idea of woman, but a male idea of women's power and glamor that most women
cannot relate to... mostly coz women cannot understand the incessant
urgency of the male procreative impulse... coz women are given better
repression equipment, to go along with bearing the greater reproductive
responsibilities.. and it is that instinctive awareness that makes women
cross their legs.
Transgendered persons have incredibly high suicide rates.. something
like 50% are still alive 7 years after surgery. They can change the body,
but that does not change the brain, and male and female brains are
different enough to be identified one from the other with the naked eye..
She is also a duck decoy, a fishing fly.. the love goddess has been
skewered onto a hook as bait for catching email addresses.. that is her
fate under patriarchy.
>Oh, what a cute pussy or whew, what a cock!" All this has become
>a 'significant' part of our culture.
I get an adoration letter, I want to be praised holistically, then for
all my bits each and every one.. then holistically again, then for my
personal qualities each and every one.. even if it is only an illusory
mirror of the author.
So what is the difference between "nice tits" and "nice eyes".. or for
that matter, nice wisdom, nice soul, nice laugh.. especially considering
everything outside is inside, and anything we say of another is true of
ourselves. The separation between me and you and barbie and the desk chair
you sit on is an illusion of ego.
>
>So what is needed I think are various forms of Pornotherapy,
>especially on the internet. If I understand correctly, Mystress
>offers one such form.
Not sure what you mean.. it sounds like something out of "A Clockwork
Orange".. how to fix naughty droog Alex..I would advise instead, if you
want to change the world, you change yourself.
Try the cremation ground meditation of trolling the news groups until
you are free of judgments. Especially the predatory ones.. alt.sex.torture,
alt.fetish.sleepy.. saw there one time, a man drugged his wife so he could
secretly take nude pix of her unconscious to share with his net-friends..
she was not particularly beautiful, it seemed more like an act of revenge.
Saw a woman having sex with a dog.. couldn't see the face of the woman, but
the dog looked confused.
Then after that, spend some time at alt.eunuchs.questions and find men
for whom the sexual impulse is such a dangerous trap that they trade
veterinary equipment and tips on how to mutilate themselves so as to be
forever freed from it.
This act will destroy their sex drive, but it will also cause massive
depression thru the sudden unbalance of hormones.
Nobody deliberately chooses to become a pedophile, or a violent rapist.
The aggressors are also victims.
>Perhaps Barbie....and some of us....need some help with this.
Look into the Mirror of Barbie and find out why she seems so dangerous
to you..then you will know more. What if Barbie is your daughter ten years
from now? What if she is your sister?
Blessings, Mystress.
PS: My eudora spellchecker keeps wanting to replace Barbie with Brie..
soft ripe cheese.. who sez computers have no sense of humor?
>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 19:45:06 EDT
From: Harsha1MTMATnospamaol.com
To: thyerATnospamfreenet.grfn.org, kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: Who is not an Avatar?:--)
Message-ID: <5b133516.357b2603ATnospamaol.com>
In a message dated 6/7/1998 11:00:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
thyerATnospamfreenet.grfn.org writes:
<< If this revelation causes you to feel like you are ceasing to be
awe-struck, rejoice becuase now you can start looking at what's being
written, >>
Harsha: That is so totally funny! Thanks for the revelation:--). Reveal Your
Self to your self. That will be the end of all revelations.
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 19:57:06 -0400
From: Avatar Thyer <thyerATnospamfreenet.grfn.org>
To: Harsha1MTMATnospamaol.com, kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: Who is not an Avatar?:--) (Harsha)
Message-Id: <199806072357.SAA05265ATnospamc.mx.execpc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Greetings.
Harsha wrote:
>That is so totally funny! Thanks for the revelation:--).
>Reveal Your Self to your self. That will be the end of all revelations.
*****
Rather than the end, I consider it to be the simultaneously the end AND the
beginning AND the fun of playing by cycling from one to the other.
I'm glad that you can realize the humor.
*smiles broadly*
I AM
Avatar Thyer
****************************
A NOTE FROM SPIRIT
I clarify aspects of the Self that I AM using mediums. This letter
clarifies some of My aspects using the medium of language. This letter is
a revelation of My perspective as the particular individual who wrote it.
Your perspective as the individualization that you are -- your perspective
as the individualization of that which I AM -- may differ.
****************************
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:03:14 +0100
From: "jb" <hc19436ATnospamautovia.com>
To: <kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com>, "Danijel Turina" <sinisa.turinaATnospamzg.tel.hr>
Subject: RE: a vote for not moving the list
Message-ID: <000a01bd9270$d52f9620$2d6335c3ATnospamjb>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Daniel wrote:
> BTW, has anyone else had cases of returned posts from
> postmasterATnospamdelhi.nic.in? It keeps sending me back everything I send to the
> list. Example:
>
I received my share too. Apparently Delhi adjusts to the format of the
original posts. When my mail-client is configured for rich text but
responded in plain text, I receive all files as ATT0000x.DAT, where x is a
number, starting with zero and counting all returns to me. I sent a request
for elimination & explanation of this bug.
Jan
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:03:18 +0100
From: "jb" <hc19436ATnospamautovia.com>
To: <kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com>, "Paul West" <paulATnospamstationone.demon.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Surely!
Message-ID: <000b01bd9270$d757f460$2d6335c3ATnospamjb>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<snip>
Jan:
> >Or it can focus one's attention to some "inner personal
> > inconsistencies" that one should iron out. Or it shows things you
> >still have
> > to discover yourself.
Paul:
> And if there is nothing left to sort out or discover?
Jan:
If there is nothing left to discover and to sort out, you must be a
liberated sage enjoying videha mukti :-))
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:03:23 +0100
From: "jb" <hc19436ATnospamautovia.com>
To: <kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com>, "Paul West" <paulATnospamstationone.demon.co.uk>
Subject: RE: i am??
Message-ID: <000c01bd9270$da315320$2d6335c3ATnospamjb>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Paul wrote
<snipped previous>
> One thing I have /very/ often encountered, for some reason, is that if
> a reader has an ego they will see it at any opportunity within
> something that someone has written, regardless of wether the writer
> had an ego. Like, if I were to say "I am intelligent", there would be
> a minor uproar (hello Mechele :). If I were to use a swearword there
> will inevitably be some folk who wont like it. Generally I find that
> people have quite rigid stereotypes of what it means to be egotistical
> and what it means not to.
<snip>
Without ego/personality, one would cease to function as a person.
Sat-Chit-Ananda would be all that could be felt as a powerful radiation. In
order to communicate, to eat, walk etc. the personality is needed. Using the
terminology you are used to, one could compare the personality as an I/O
(input/output) processor. The rules of the processor depend on things like
culture, upbringing, education. All sensory input (in yoga, this includes
thoughts) is processed according to the rules and the output is what we
present to "the world". The processor works on the basis of feedback,
meaning that the processed information can be used to change the rules of
the processor itself. This is exactly what happens as a result of
meditation. The rules will simplify to a great extent and usually the
personality becomes like this: All in - (processing input) - always kind and
helpful out. There are exceptions of course, i.e. when " kind and helpful"
is considered to have a wrong effect. As Western society could rightly be
called a culture based on personality, one can expect very complicated I/O
processors.
Jan
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 16:27:51 -0700
From: Mary Ezzell <maryATnospamsonic.net>
To: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Subject: Re: i am??
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980607162747.00b19b40ATnospampop.sonic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 07:16 AM 6/8/98 -0400, Avatar Thyer wrote:
>I am glad that you "can't picture" your teachers declaring "I AM" because
>it suggests that you are free to choose to consider Avatar Thyer's
>And what you choose reveals more about your motivations than it necessarily
>says anything accurate about Avatar Thyer's actual motivations and
experience.
Ho hum, another self-appointed mind-reader.
Angelique, I vote for declaring stuff like this off-topic, and
unsubscribing people who do it.
Mary
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 00:48:28 GMT
From: sassiATnospamworldnet.att.net (Jack)
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: The 5th Thunder????
Message-ID: <357f3477.12980834ATnospammailhost.worldnet.att.net>
Appears to be an 8.4 magnitude seismic event that occurred in the
BALTICS-BELARUS region in NW RUSSIA. The magnitude is the largest seen
in 1998.
The U. S. Geological Survey is currently not acknowledging the event
that was captured by the International Data Center, an automated
system that alerts the world to nuclear testing.
[http://www.cdidc.org:65120/arpabox/vision_top.html]
Date Time Lat Lon Nph Mag Region
1998/06/05 21:57:33.4 9.19S 157.84E 11 mb 4.2 Solomon Islands
1998/06/05 21:53:22.0 43.39N 13.18E 12 ML 3.8 Central Italy
1998/06/05 21:26:34.5 67.81N 33.20E 6 mb 8.4 Baltics-Russia
1998/06/05 21:25:45.4 27.91N 126.77E 23 mb 4.0 NW Ryukyu
Islands
http://www.cdidc.org:65120/web-bin/event/bulletin=ABELs/evids=19903077/map_s
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.