1997/11/22 10:19
kundalini-l-d Digest V97 #761
kundalini-l-d Digest Volume 97 : Issue 761
Today's Topics:
Re: Free quicky Reading [ E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com> ]
Ok Ok.. giggling Im buried in readin [ FIute <FIuteATnospamprodigy.net> ]
Re: Free quicky Reading [ Jan Curran <ivydruidATnospamtp.net> ]
[Fwd: Re: Free quicky Reading] [ FIute <FIuteATnospamprodigy.net> ]
twin flames part 2 [ "Susan Carlson" <divine_goddessATnospamhot ]
48 Hours -Skeptic HEaven [ Ruth Trimble <trimbleATnospamhawaii.edu> ]
Re: Free quicky Reading [ onarresATnospaminreach.com ]
Re: HRTZEN: thoughts by age [ indra <indraATnospamsmartt.com> ]
re: deja vu [ hbarrettATnospamix.netcom.com (Holly N. Ba ]
RE: Another perspective [ Dieter Dambiec <d.dambiecATnospamstudent.c ]
Free Readings [ FIute <FIuteATnospamprodigy.net> ]
Re: Deja Vu [ M <chooseagainATnospamthegrid.net> ]
Re: Free quicky Reading [ E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com> ]
[Fwd: Re: Free quicky Reading] [ E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com> ]
[Fwd: Re: Free quicky Reading] [ E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com> ]
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 18:03:57 -0800
From: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: Free quicky Reading
Message-ID: <34763D8D.2628ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
FIute wrote:
> Ok.. if anyone wants a free reading..and it will be just about
> a page. send me a note..
> Tell me if you want something general or if you have a specific
> question.
> I'll be using tarot, just in case your interested.. or I Ching if you
> like.. grin
> Love,
> flute
My Beloved Flute,
It does not matter what system you use - accuracy would be much bettr . . .
Here is your reading for me . . .
readings??
so Im a psychic reader and the interesting thing is.. that this stuff is
very accurate sometimes.. grin
Yes guessing is sometimes accurate also. If you are a psychic reader I suggest you move
into another area of work <bigger grin>
and BTW I do not know you or any of your circumstances..
you know a great deal about me from my posting to Kundalini
I slightly recognize your name from somewhere.. probably kundalini list
but Im not sure if you are lobster. ok..
shuffling your cards.. and letting what flows.. flow
Yes I seem to remember your name is Carol and the surname begins with M
Spooky eh - I have a memory . . .
Did you know I was an expert Tarot Reader - well now you do
ok.. you have been on a journey recently and may still be on that
journey this could be a spiritual journey.
Everyone is on a spiritual journey so how can you get that wrong? I have not been on a
recent journey.
You are carrying too many burdens, because of some recent past
successes.. like you have been dancing on the world. Your enthusiam is
preventing you from dealing with your workload and its becomeing more
overwhelming.
I work one day a week - workload?
You are enthusiastic, firey probably a fire sign.. Sagattarius, leo or
Aries and that's the mode you are in right now.. however in your home
environment that firey action has you in a bit of trouble and you are
frustrated.
Well you had a 1 in 4 chance with that but I am not a fire sign. I am not in trouble at
home.
There is hope and excitement in you for a new relationship that is
blooming..
Wrong. No new relationship but of course it could be a new friend - hey funny how we
quite often make new friends. The statement would probably be true most of the time for
most people . . .
Be careful in the next two months, your focus is needed and it will be
difficult to get control of. In six months you will be doing all the
detail work that is needed to succeed.. everything is working toward the
turning of the Wheel of Fortune. You've been on top and now that is
changing as all things change.
This means what it is the equivalent of saying nothing.
There is an abrupt change coming.. and a new job pathway..be prepared..
Love,
flute
My Beloved Flute your reading was extraordinary in its inaccuracy - stick to Reiki.
I do not wish to be unkind but this is twaddle.
If someone is able to use their psychic gifts more accurately let me know and I'll send
their details to Randi - you too can obtain 100 000 US Dollars but you have to be
psychic . . .
Now I know you think you have genuine abilities and psychic capacity but Flute please
consider what is going on here. You are saying nothing of any value. in a live situation
you get much feed back so you will be more accurate. I am not trying to belittle people
in their beliefs but trying to encourage them to understand that until they are serious
and expose the ridiculous and unworking, the real experiences and abilities will be
thrown out alongside the endless twaddle. Sceptics like James Randi are right to be
sceptical and we should support their efforts to expose frauds and the ignorant. We
should if we can provide the genuine. Can anyone? Why don't they?
100 000 US dollars if anyone can prove psychic ability - hey you could give it to
charity . . .
Contact Randi now . . .
Most Kind Regards
Lobster
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:20:01 -0600
From: FIute <FIuteATnospamprodigy.net>
To: "kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com" <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Ok Ok.. giggling Im buried in readings..
Message-ID: <34760911.1FDFATnospamprodigy.net>
I have about 20 or more readings to do.. I'll get those out..
and I'll have to say.. maybe next time for everyone else..
Love,
flute
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 17:48:58 -0500
From: Jan Curran <ivydruidATnospamtp.net>
To: "kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com" <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Re: Free quicky Reading
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19971121174857.00921b30ATnospammail.tp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 06:03 PM 11/21/97 -0800, Lobster wrote:
>My Beloved Flute,
>It does not matter what system you use - accuracy would be much bettr . . .
and
>My Beloved Flute your reading was extraordinary in its inaccuracy - stick
to Reiki.
>I do not wish to be unkind but this is twaddle.
You know, there is nothing wrong with being sceptical, nor is there any
harm in not believing in something either. But, I am offended at your
method of delivery. Flute sent me my reading by *private* email, and I
replied by the same. I really think your critique woulld have been better
off sent that way, as well. I have been lurking on this list for months,
and I have read many of your other posts. I realize that you have a certain
tendency to "tell it as you see it", and there is nothing wrong with that,
but I find reading your criticisms of other rather unnecessary. Please, be
kind and take it off list.
Thank you,
Jan Curran
**********************
ivydruidATnospamtp.net
I don't have to believe as you do,
but I respect your right to do it.
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:57:07 -0600
From: FIute <FIuteATnospamprodigy.net>
To: "kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com" <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Free quicky Reading]
Message-ID: <347611C3.69BDATnospamprodigy.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------CA20EE2461"
Well lobster.. giggling..
I suppose I should put my answer out here too..
Laughing.. you don't upset me, just prove my point.
Love,
flute
Message-ID: <34760628.4E5CATnospamprodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:07:36 -0600
From: FIute <FIuteATnospamprodigy.net>
Reply-To: FIuteATnospamprodigy.net
Organization: Prodigy Internet
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
To: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: Free quicky Reading
References: <3475CFEA.1A55ATnospamprodigy.net> <34763D8D.2628ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
> Lobster
Giggling.. Meja
You always fasinate me.. I wasn't sure it was you...
You are a reader too?? so do a reading for me and lets see how accurate
you are, or if I can find outside reasons that interfere wth my
understanding.. giggling
and no.. I couldn't at the time remember who you were..
Everyone is psychic and that happens on another level of awareness and
like the I ching.. How you perceive the universe is how it is at the
time. When I read the cards for you or anyone reads the cards for
anyone else. The cards that are pulled and the meanings of those cards
fall into the coincendences of your mind patterns. And you own mind
unfolds the story.. SO I don't read the cards, but they read you..
giggling
and love to you..
and your overdoin it on the PC instead of ...
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 15:04:58 PST
From: "Susan Carlson" <divine_goddessATnospamhotmail.com>
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: twin flames part 2
Message-ID: <19971121230459.18681.qmailATnospamhotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
I would like to post an Allegory by author Martin Schulman. Here it
is.
There once was a man and woman who loved each other very much. In
fact,
their love was so deep that each saw God's perfection in the other.
In
each other's eyes they saw the world for their souls were as one.
In
each other's hearts they felt the rhythm of Divine energy for they
lived
and breathed as one. In each other's ears they heard the same
music, but
in each other's bodies they saw differences.
The sameness they felt did not need understanding, for it
constantly
filled them with joy. But the differences confused them. Neither
knew
whose differences were better. Soon the man and woman began to
grow
self-conscious. Their love was unchanged, but the differences in
their
bodies began to make them think differently toward each other.
They
began to act differently. Soon the oneness they experienced with
each
other became clouded and obscured. The sameness that they felt was
overshadowed by the differences. God's perfection was now hidden
by
their perception of imperfection.
The man wondered if the woman's body was truly the most perfect one
he
could experience. The woman wondered the same thing about the man.
Soon
they began to magnify the physical imperfections they saw in each
other.
Then they magnified emotional differences. Then they began to
analyze
their love for each other. In time they could hardly see their
love.
The man sought other woman. The woman sought other men. Each one
tried
to find what was missing in the other. For 12,000 years they
roamed the
earth. The man found many beautiful women. The woman found many
handsome men. Still, in each person something seemed to be
missing. As
time went by, they grew weary and disappointed. Their travels made
their
bodies weak. Their eyes no longer shone. Their hearts no longer
knew
what love was, for their disillusionment had brought them to
despair.
The ages had worn away what they thought they were looking for, and
they
no longer remembered.
Then one day they met. They saw eachothers weary bodies, and they
looked
in each other's eyes. And they knew something they never knew
before.
No longer could they see the differences between each other. Their
eyes
began to shine through tears of happiness. In the blurriness of
shimmering truth they saw through each other's imperfections. In
the
humility that their journeys taught them, they were the perfection
of
their love. The heavens opened with mercy. The clouds of
confusion were
gone. And the sunlight cast its rays on the great treasure they
had
discovered. Their youth returned. Their weary bodies grew strong,
as
they became one once again. From their oneness, their love
blossomed in
eternal truth.
______________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 13:07:31 -1000
From: Ruth Trimble <trimbleATnospamhawaii.edu>
To: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Subject: 48 Hours -Skeptic HEaven
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.971121125731.17707B-100000ATnospamuhunix4>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Hi
RE: E. Jason's report on the TV show text on 48 Hours.
This program on 48 hours I was so excited to see so I taped it... waste
of tape. Ithought "finally these things are becoming Mainstream..."
NOT...Wrong! The whole thing and one other called Pseudo Science with
Alan Alda were the same thing... showing how tarot reading, palm reading,
dowsing(heaven's even that) and much more are not reliable and basically a
joke.
I was so disgusted... do you think they are worried about the New Age
focus ? Too many people getting involved in their other senses and not
believing in the "status quo" paradigm? Too many people thinking for
themselves and not asking 'experts' opinions? Too many people realizing
that the truth is 'inside' not outside. THIS is very dangerous... they
have to find ways of putting off the weak....
That's my 3 centsATnospam!
Ruth
*****
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 15:16:13 -0800
From: onarresATnospaminreach.com
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: Free quicky Reading
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19971121151613.007d3140ATnospammail.inreach.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear Jan,
I, like you and everyone else may be a bit skeptical from time to time, but
that's o.k. and we can be nice about it as well... However... when someone
does a private email, it is considered bad taste to post it to the list. I
have many friends that have come my way through this list, and I would
never think of posting any of their emails. Should I do this, I don't think
they would be too happy about it, nor would they think too kindly of me for
doing it.
My dear Lobster, I know how nice you can be, but at times you are so
critical that many of our brothers and sisters from the list may not be
ready to receive this type of message... and may even think this lobster
should be put back into the void to swim a bit and think about what
lobsters should and should not do... hmm? I know you do not wish to be
unkind, but perhaps you were! Try 'thank you' and let it go into the
cosmos... Next time - do some private e's. dor
At 05:48 PM 11/21/97 -0500, you wrote:
>At 06:03 PM 11/21/97 -0800, Lobster wrote:
>>My Beloved Flute,
>>It does not matter what system you use - accuracy would be much bettr . . .
>and
>>My Beloved Flute your reading was extraordinary in its inaccuracy - stick
>to Reiki.
>>I do not wish to be unkind but this is twaddle.
>
> You know, there is nothing wrong with being sceptical, nor is there any
>harm in not believing in something either. But, I am offended at your
>method of delivery. Flute sent me my reading by *private* email, and I
>replied by the same. I really think your critique woulld have been better
>off sent that way, as well. I have been lurking on this list for months,
>and I have read many of your other posts. I realize that you have a certain
>tendency to "tell it as you see it", and there is nothing wrong with that,
>but I find reading your criticisms of other rather unnecessary. Please, be
>kind and take it off list.
> Thank you,
> Jan Curran
>**********************
>ivydruidATnospamtp.net
>I don't have to believe as you do,
>but I respect your right to do it.
>
>
>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 19:27:28 -0800
From: indra <indraATnospamsmartt.com>
To: lodpressATnospamintercomm.com
CC: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>, tariqasATnospamworld.std.com, SuficlassATnospamnv.net,
kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com, insight <insightATnospamworld.std.com>,
heartzenATnospamlistserv.servtech.com, OCCULTHAVENATnospamHOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM,
hari_patelATnospamlondonelec.co.uk, gmanchaATnospamsrvnt1.upco.es,
rhavyATnospamglobalnet.co.uk, gbsphcmjATnospamibmmail.com,
Anold Lloyd <a.lloydATnospamnetmatters.co.uk>
Subject: Re: HRTZEN: thoughts by age
Message-ID: <3476511A.393B61A0ATnospamsmartt.com>
Gloria, two numbers come to mind. 29 or 9+2 = 11.
Indra
Gloria Greco wrote:
> E Jason wrote:
> Gloria responds to the contempaltion of life...
> Ed, this is great, are you really 92? If so, we love having your wisdom
> at our fingers. If you are not, we still love having it. Gloria
> >
> > Subject: Contemplating Life...
> >
> > I've learned that silent company is often more healing than words of
> > advice.
> > Age 24
> >
> > I've learned that if someone says something unkind about me, I must live
> > so that no one will believe it.
> > Age 39
> >
> > I've learned that just when I get my room the way I like it, Mom makes me
> > clean it up.
> > Age 13
> >
> > I've learned that children and grandparents are natural allies.
> > Age 46
> >
> > I've learned that even when I have pains, I don't have to be one.
> > Age 82
> >
> > I've learned that if you pursue happiness, it will elude you. But if you
> > focus on your family, the needs of others, your work, meeting new people,
> > and doing the very best you can, happiness will find you.
> > Age 65
> >
> > I've learned that motel mattresses are better on the side away from the
> > phone.
> > Age 50
> >
> > I've learned that regardless of your relationship with your parents, you
> > miss them terribly after they die.
> > Age 53
> >
> > I've learned that you can't hide a piece of broccoli in a glass of milk.
> > Age 7
> >
> > I've learned that the greater a person's sense of guilt, the greater his
> > need to cast blame on others.
> > Age 46
> >
> > I've learned that life sometimes gives you a second chance.
> > Age 62
> >
> > I've learned that it pays to believe in miracles. And to tell the truth,
> > I've seen several.
> > Age 73
> >
> > I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catchers mitt on
> > both hands. you need to be able to throw something back.
> > Age 64
> >
> > I've learned that brushing my child's hair is one of life's great
> > pleasures.
> > Age 29
> >
> > I've learned that wherever I go, the world?s worst drivers have followed
> > me there.
> > Age 29
> >
> > I've learned that singing "Amazing Grace" can lift my spirits for hours.
> > Age 49
> >
> > I've learned that you can make someone's day by simply sending them a
> > little card.
> > Age 44
> >
> > I've learned that if you want to cheer yourself up, you should try
> > cheering someone else up.
> > Age 13
> >
> > I've learned that when I wave to people in the country, they stop what
> > they are doing and wave back.
> > Age 9
> >
> > I've learned that although it's hard to admit it, I'm secretly glad my
> > parents are strict with me.
> > Age 15
> >
> > I've learned that you can tell a lot about a man by the way he handles
> > these three things: a rainy day, lost luggage, and tangled Christmas tree
> > lights.
> > Age 52
> >
> > I've learned that whenever I decide something with kindness, I usually
> > make the right decision.
> > Age 66
> >
> > I've learned that if you want to do something positive for your children,
> > try to improve your marriage.
> > Age 61
> >
> > I've learned that making a living is not the same thing as making a life.
> > Age 58
> >
> > I've learned that everyone can use a prayer.
> > Age 72
> >
> > I've learned that I like my teacher because she cries when we sing
> > "Silent Night".
> > Age 7
> >
> > I've learned that there are people who love you dearly but just don't
> > know how to show it.
> > Age 41
> >
> > I've learned that every day you should reach out and touch someone.
> > People love that human touch--holding hands, a warm hug, or just a friendly pat
> > on the back.
> > Age 85
> >
> > I've learned that I still have a lot to learn.
> > Age 92
>
> --
>
> Enter The Silence to Know God ... and... accept life as the teacher.
> Gloria Joy Greco
> e-mail me at : lodpressATnospamintercomm.com and visit our homepages at:
> http://users.intercomm.com/larryn/
> &
> http://www.freeyellow.com/members/zg888/
> Hope you enjoy them!
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 06:37:57 -0600 (CST)
From: hbarrettATnospamix.netcom.com (Holly N. Barrett, Ph.D.)
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: re: deja vu
Message-Id: <199711221237.GAA20554ATnospamdfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com>
In my book the possible mechanism of deja vu, a glitch in brain
function, and its possible meaning as a sign of expanding consciousness
are not mutually exclusive. We have bodies and when spirit is active
our bodies respond with "symptoms." I suspect your intuition is
correct that the frequency increase in deja vu means that your brain is
transforming -- you are seeing in new ways and/or repatterning old ways
of conceptualizing. Sometimes I think wisdom comes more easily with
age, for example, because of the natural decline in short-term memory
function; losing trains of thought allows one to be much more
present-centered and therefore more open to new modes of perception.
"Science" (though not all scientists) seems to imply that a rational
explanation for human experience will nullify the irrational -- a silly
argument if you believe we are God/dess's body! Holly
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 23:56:51 +1100
From: Dieter Dambiec <d.dambiecATnospamstudent.canberra.edu.au>
To: kundalini-lATnospamlists.execpc.com
Cc: "OCCULTHAVENATnospamHOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM" <OCCULTHAVENATnospamHOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM>,
"kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com" <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: RE: Another perspective
Message-ID: <01BCF7AE.51932820ATnospampppclient6.canberra.edu.au>
-----Original Message-----
From: Harsh K. Luthar [SMTP:hlutharATnospambryant1.bryant.edu]
True spirituality manifests in our everyday ordinary life
and has little to do with physical and psychic powers.
[>] Agree entirely. A complete and utter waste of time.
The only good physical power is plain old good health - sentient diet the better of them all.
The only good psychic power is moral courage.
dieter
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 08:53:21 -0600
From: FIute <FIuteATnospamprodigy.net>
To: "kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com" <kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com>
Subject: Free Readings
Message-ID: <3476F1E1.12B4ATnospamprodigy.net>
I finished up a few of your readings, but I will complete the rest
tomorrow.. I have to get to work now..
Love to all of you,
flute
http://www.create.org
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 09:00:09 -0800 (PST)
From: M <chooseagainATnospamthegrid.net>
To: "Wehbi, M. (Rachid)" <RACHID.WEHBIATnospamROYALBANK.COM>
Cc: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: Re: Deja Vu
Message-Id: <199711221700.JAA29772ATnospamgridsat.thegrid.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 11:14 AM 11/21/97 -0500, Wehbi, M. (Rachid) wrote:
> What is puzzling me (in an enjoyable kind of way) is the
>frequency of
> this occurrence. It has driven me to find spiritual significance
>in the
> matter (of which I will not bore you with here).
>
> Any medical/spiritual insights, jokes, ideas etc... are welcome :)
If I go a few days without even a vague deja vu I feel I am off track or out
of touch with my spirituality and Higher Self. I consider deja vu's as
encouragement and reinforcement of right action, decisions made, etc. I'd
say this has been going on for 5 or 10 years or more.
If I think of time as not linear but cyclical, and then think of those
cycles as packed tight on a spindle (like paper towels or twine), I envision
my dreamself wandering up and down the adjoining few layers or threads on
the spindle each night and thus I don't worry about it. I only fret if my
dreamself and my dayself appear to lose the contact that these deja vu's are
testament to.
That's my current thinking on the matter anyway.
M
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 06:12:19 -0800
From: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com, onarresATnospaminreach.com
Subject: Re: Free quicky Reading
Message-ID: <3476E843.48BAATnospamdial.pipex.com>
onarresATnospaminreach.com wrote:
>
> Dear Jan,
>
> I, like you and everyone else may be a bit skeptical from time to time, but
> that's o.k. and we can be nice about it as well... However... when someone
> does a private email, it is considered bad taste to post it to the list. I
> have many friends that have come my way through this list, and I would
> never think of posting any of their emails. Should I do this, I don't think
> they would be too happy about it, nor would they think too kindly of me for
> doing it.
I am not concerned with people thinking kindly of me. Flute responded well - there was
no hurt in her that I could feel. You must take the consequences of your actions as I do
the consequences of mine.
> My dear Lobster, I know how nice you can be, but at times you are so
> critical that many of our brothers and sisters from the list may not be
> ready to receive this type of message... and may even think this lobster
> should be put back into the void to swim a bit and think about what
> lobsters should and should not do... hmm? I know you do not wish to be
> unkind, but perhaps you were! Try 'thank you' and let it go into the
> cosmos... Next time - do some private e's. dor
I would like to publically thank Flute for her good humour which is an example to all of
us. Her reading was twaddle. Your advice is noted - and I choose to ignore it. Thank you
for your concern.
Be advised
'tis
Lobster
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 06:12:50 -0800
From: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Free quicky Reading]
Message-ID: <3476E862.15CATnospamdial.pipex.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------496C13B87923"
--
Alchemical Research Center
All you need to know
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/place/vv60/index.html
X-Mozilla-Status: 0801
FCC: C:\COMS\DIAL\netscape\mail\user0\sent
Message-ID: <3476E683.3162ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 06:04:51 -0800
From: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I; 16bit)
To: Jan Curran <ivydruidATnospamtp.net>
Subject: Re: Free quicky Reading
References: <3.0.32.19971121174857.00921b30ATnospammail.tp.net>
Jan Curran wrote:
> You know, there is nothing wrong with being sceptical, nor is there any
> harm in not believing in something either. But, I am offended at your
> method of delivery. Flute sent me my reading by *private* email, and I
> replied by the same. I really think your critique woulld have been better
> off sent that way, as well. I have been lurking on this list for months,
> and I have read many of your other posts. I realize that you have a certain
> tendency to "tell it as you see it", and there is nothing wrong with that,
> but I find reading your criticisms of other rather unnecessary. Please, be
> kind and take it off list.
You may be offended. Flute is bigger than your offence - and bigger than my rudeness.
As for being kind - I leave that to you to do in your way.
Most KIND regards
the netiquette rule breaking Lobster
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 06:13:20 -0800
From: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
To: kundalini-lATnospamexecpc.com
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Free quicky Reading]
Message-ID: <3476E880.3663ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7D4B31AF29FB"
--
Alchemical Research Center
All you need to know
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/place/vv60/index.html
X-Mozilla-Status: 0801
FCC: C:\COMS\DIAL\netscape\mail\user0\sent
Message-ID: <3476E5A7.5430ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 06:01:11 -0800
From: E Jason <vv60ATnospamdial.pipex.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I; 16bit)
To: FIuteATnospamprodigy.net
Subject: Re: Free quicky Reading
References: <3475CFEA.1A55ATnospamprodigy.net> <34763D8D.2628ATnospamdial.pipex.com> <34760628.4E5CATnospamprodigy.net>
FIute wrote:
>
> > Lobster
> Giggling.. Meja
> You always fasinate me.. I wasn't sure it was you...
> You are a reader too?? so do a reading for me and lets see how accurate
> you are, or if I can find outside reasons that interfere wth my
> understanding.. giggling
My Dear Flute,
I do not use cards because I have no need of them. I am pleased to see that you have no
animosity to me posting what was private publically - after all you sent me an
unsolicited reading, when I had posted something very sceptical - you were taking a huge
risk in that. It is that quality that you have shown that is real, genuine and of value
because it illustrates how we should behave when people do something "unkind" to us.
So many thanks for that which contains the Real Truth :)
> and no.. I couldn't at the time remember who you were..
> Everyone is psychic and that happens on another level of awareness and
> like the I ching.. How you perceive the universe is how it is at the
> time. When I read the cards for you or anyone reads the cards for
> anyone else. The cards that are pulled and the meanings of those cards
> fall into the coincendences of your mind patterns. And you own mind
> unfolds the story.. SO I don't read the cards, but they read you..
> giggling
> and love to you..
> and your overdoin it on the PC instead of ...
Flute like most readers you did not fail, the cards did, or I did for getting the
skeptical reading I needed. Any excuse will do (for excuse put in explanation)
How wonderful - complete twaddle even now. That is the situation - the interaction is of
value because you are showing great kindness. The reading was rubbish - justify it
anyway you can or wish but it was rubbish.
your overdoin it on the PC instead of ...
you are feeling good about life and things are going well for you
you are a very soft and tender hearted person who will do anything to help others
you like others company but have a need for solitude and natural living
you have a slightly unusual sense of humour
you have a cat or certainly would like to
there is a lot going on in your life at the moment
I guess that was 100% accurate - hey no I really am psychic so say it was 100% accurate
but what have I really said . . .
Bless you Flute
Lobster
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.