This FAQ gives a background on the phenomenon of kundalini and is assumed
material before reading the other related articles: Kundalini Yogas FAQ Siddha Mahayoga FAQ
"Kundalini" literally means coiling, like a snake. In the classical
literature of hatha yoga kundalini is described as a coiled serpent at
the base of the spine. The image of coiling, like a spring, conveys the
sense of untapped potential energy. Perhaps more meaningfully kundalini
can be described as a great reservoir of creative energy at the base of
the spine. It's not useful to sit with our consciousness fixed in our head
and think of kundalini as a foreign force running up and down our spine.
Unfortunately the serpent image may serve to accentuate this alien nature
of the image. It's more useful to think of kundalini energy as the very
foundation of our consciousness so that when kundalini moves through our
bodies our consciousness necessarily changes with it.
The concept of kundalini can also be examined from a strictly psychological
perspective. From this perspective kundalini can be thought of as a rich
source of psychic or libidinous energy in our unconscious.
In the classical literature of Kashmir Shaivism kundalini is described
in three different manifestions. The first of these is as the universal
energy or para-kundalini. The second of these is as the energizing function
of the body-mind complex or prana-kundalini. The third of these is as consciousness
or shakti-kundalini which simultaneously subsumes and intermediates between
these two. Ultimately these three forms are the same but understanding
these three different forms will help to understand the differerent manifestations
of kundalini.
What is the difference between prana and kundalini? What
is the difference between qi (or chi) and kundalini?
First let us try to relate to concepts from the same
tradition - prana and kundalini. Prana has been translated as the ``vital
breath'' and ``bio-energetic motility''; it is associated with maintaining
the functioning of the mind and body. Kundalini, in its form as prana-kundalini,
is identical to prana ; however, Kundalini also has a manifestations as
consciousness and a as a unifying cosmic energy. One could ascribe these
same aspects to prana as well so past a certain point these become distinctions
without differences.
From the subjective standpoint of an individual actually experiencing
the awakening of kundalini I have found three completely different opinions:
The first opinion is that a pranic awakening is only a prelude to a full
kundalini awakening. Tibetan yogins that I have encountered consider the
activation of prana (Tibetan: rlung) as merely a prerequisite for the activation
of kundalini (Tibetan: gTummo). What's attractive about this viewpoint
is that it explains the difference between the experience of simply having
pleasant sensations in the spine and the much more powerful experience
of having a ``freight-train''-like full kundalini experience.
The second opinion, espoused by Swami Shivom Tirth for example, is that
prana and kundalini are absolutely equivalent and that it is not meaningful
in any way to describe a difference between kundalini rising and prana
rising. When posed with question as to how to distinguish between pleasant
sensations that show some pranic-activity in the spine and the much more
powerful experience Swami Shivom Tirth said that the difference is not
in the nature of the activity but in the consciousness that observes it.
If the consciousness that experiences the pranic activity is seated within
the spine (or more correctly, the central channel, known as the sushumna),
then the experience is felt much more powerfully.
The third opinion, espoused by the modern hatha yogin, Desikaran, is that
pranic awakening is the true experience to be aimed for and kundalini is
actually an obstruction. Desikaran sees the kundalini as a block in the
central channel and thus the kundalini must be ``killed'' to make way for
the prana. This is the most unusual view of the three.
The Chinese concept of qi (or chi) can be safely identified with the
Indian concept of prana.
If all this seems confusing - don't worry, you're in good company.
My conclusion is that these are all different terminologies for dealing
with a common set of experiences. Any one of these viewpoints is adequate
for describing the full range of experiences. What is probably more relevant
is to distinguish two different experiences which are often confused. In
one an individual experiences some pleasant energizing electric energy
running along the spine. This experience itself brings about a wide range
of experiences and results in vitality and sensitivity. Another very distinct
experience is the experience of kundalini entering the sushumna and rising
up the spine. As soon as kundalini enters the sushumna this experience
will completely overwhelm ordinary waking consciousness. From the moment
that kundalini enters the sushumna there will no longer be a distrinction
between the subjective consciousness which experiences and the object of
experience. This experience much more profoundly transfigures consciousness.
If kundalini is universal, why do some kundalini yogins
seem to have more kundalini-energy than others ??
It's an intriguing question. If an individual's kundalini is viewed
as simply a personal reservoir of a cosmic energy then why would one person
appear to have more of a reservoir of kundalini energy than another? Nevertheless,
this does appear to be the case. This is probably another advantage of
the viewpoint that prana (or qi) is the same as kundalini. Some Chinese
texts distinguish between ``innate qi'' or ``pre-natal qi'' that one is
born with and ``cultivated qi'' that can be developed. Clearly some people
simply have more ``innate qi.'' This manifests as a stronger more resilient
body and greater general vitality.
Through training those that have relatively weak ``innate qi'' may
surpass those who have strong ``innate qi'' but do not train. There are
many stories in the Chinese literature of Qi Gong about people who took
up Qi Gong in order to improve their poor health became powerful martial
artists or great qi gong masters. Of course those that have strong ``innate
qi'' and also train their qi may develop the strongest qi of all.
What does kundalini have to do with spiritual enlightenment? What
is the goal of kundalini yoga?
First we need a few concepts: In yogic anatomy the sushumna is the
central channel and conduit for the kundalini energy that runs along our
spine and up to the crown of our head. Along this channel are placed additional
channel networks called cakras. These cakras are associated with major
aspects of our anatomy - for example our throat, heart, solar plexus, and
in turn these aspects of our anatomy are related to aspects of our human
nature. According to the literature of kundalini yoga our experience of
these centers is limited due to knots which restrict the flow of energy
into these centers. Three knots are particuarly important. The knot of
Brahma which restricts the center at the base of the spine. The knot of
Vishnu which restricts the heart center and the knot of Rudra which restricts
the center between the eyebrows. These knots form an important framework
in yogic thinking and the stages toward enlightenment are articulated in
terms of breaking through these knots in the yogic classic the Hatha Yoga
Pradipika as well as in some of the yoga upanishads. Specifically, four
stages of progress are described:
arambha,
ghata,
parichaya and
nishpatti.
Arambha is associated with breaking the knot of Brahma and the awakening
of kundalini. Ghata is associated with breaking the knot of Vishnu and
and with internal absorption. Parichaya the absorption deepens and in nishpatti
the knot of Rudra is pierced and the kundalini may ascend to the center
at the crown of the head. In this state transcendence is integrated and,
according to the yogic liteature, the yogi has nothing more to attain.
Putting these elaborate physiological decriptions aside, the goal of
kundalini yoga is the same as the goal of any legimitate spiritual practice:
To be liberated from the limited bounds of the self-centered and alienated
ego. In kundalini yoga this is associated with internal manifestations
of the kundalini but the external manifestations should be similar to any
other legitiimate spiritual practice.
So does everyone agree that kundalini awakening is necessary for
enlightenment?
The view that kundalini awakening is necessary for enlightenment is
held in the diverse literature of Kashmir Shaivism and in other Hindu Tantric
literature. It is found in the literature of the Hatha Yogis and the Nath
Sampradaya. You will find similar views in many Buddhist Tantric works.
In addition this view is held by recent spiritual figures such as Shri
Ramakrishna, Swami Sivananda, Paramahamsa Yogananda and Swami Vivekananda
and of course by contemporary kundalini yogins themselves.
Nevertheless there are some dissenters from this view. These include
Sri Chinmoy, Da Free John and Gurdjieff. Dissent can take a number of different
forms. For Gurjieff kundalini is associated only with a binding force that
leads us to be more attached to the world. Such a view of kundalini is
not entirely inaccurate but only reflects the functioning of kundalini
in the lower energy centers. For Sri Chinmoy kundalini is an amplifying
function that may make an individual more powerful but not more enlightened.
From my perspective this also only addresses the impact of kundalini while
it operates in the lower energy centers.
Da Free John (born Franklin Jones, a. k. a. Da Love Ananda) has a much
more fundamental criticism of kundalini. As far as I understand his position,
for him enlightenment cannot be the result of an experience; it is a cognitive
transformation. Kundalini may evoke a wide variety of experiences but these
are not in and of themselves enlightening. This is an interesting perspective
but it seems to assume that the raising of kundalini is an experience in
which an ego-consciousness experiences a separate object known as kundalini.
Again, this view is consistent with the experience of kundalini in the
lower energy centers in which the ego is detached from the movement of
kundalini and kundalini experiences are precieved as separate from oneself.
However, I would argue that as kundalini rises the ego-consciousness becomes
infused in a more fundamental consciousness of cit-shakti-kundalini and
this experience does in fact produce a fundamental cognitive change.
Finally, there are many other spiritual practices, such as Zen, Vipassana
meditation that consider kundalini irrelevant. Some practitioners or even
teachers of these paths, such as Jiyu Kennet, may have kundalini experiences
but generally kundalini is not a pivotal part of these paths.
Can I use kundalini yoga simply to improve my health?
Yoga exercises which were traditionally used to purify the body in
preparation for awakening the kundalini can also be used simply to improve
the health. To practice techniques aimed at actively awakening kundalini
with the goal of simply improving your health seems to be a misuse of these
powerful techniques.
There are those that teach kundalini yoga principally emphasizing its
benefits on health without much discussion of the spiritual benefits. This
is how hatha yoga has been taught in the west for some time. The affect
of this approach depends on the attitude of the student. There is certainly
nothing wrong with trying to improve your health but there is a tension
between awakening an energy that will ultimately burn up the ego and trying
to shape that energy to simply fulfill an ego-oriented motive.
Is there any scientific basis for kundalini and the cakras? Do I
really have to believe that all these cakras physically exist?
Research on kundalini is especially spotty. There is no compelling
work to show that the system represents insights into actual human anatomy.
But it's important to understand that kundalini and its network of channels
and cakras is simply how yogins have chosen to explain their experience
and that yogins from many cultures have arrived at similar, though not
identical, concepts. The true physical mechanisms underlying these experiences
may be very different from those described. Izaak Benthov has proposed
a model to explain kundalini in terms of micro- motion in the brain. In
this model experiences are associated with parts of the body, such as the
heart, because the part of the brain associated with that part of the body
is stimulated by micro-vibrations. His model is treated in ``The Kundalini
Experience'' by Sannella referenced below. From a practical perspective
the key thing is our subjective experience and that the roadmap of these
subjective experiences has been mapped out.
If there is any contemporary teaching that is even more diverse in
approach than kundalini yoga it must be qi gong. As a result it is hard
to compare kundalini yoga to qi gong. From my limited exposure to qi gong
it is clear there are many qi gong practices that are identical to kundalini
yoga practices. What is also clear is that may qi gong practitioners have
reported experiences that are identical to those of kundalini yogins. In
so far as each of these practices aims at eliminating blocks to the qi/prana
energy then they share a common ground.
What about Tibetan Buddhism - has kundalini been known in Tibet?
Kundalini yoga in the Natha Sampradaya and Vajrayana in Tibetan Buddhism
both take their origin from the Mahasiddhas who were active in India from
the 8th century to the 12th century. Kundalini yoga practices formed the
core of the teachings of a number of these Mahasiddhas and are strongly
represented in both Tibetan Buddhist practices and contemporary kundalini
yoga practices. Kundalini yoga was spoken of as ``Candali yoga'' by these
Mahasiddhas and became known as gTummo rnal 'byor in Tibet. Candali yoga
was a key practice of the famous Tibetan yogin Milarepa. The role of kundalini
yoga in Tibetan Buddhism is discussed in more detail in the Kundalini
Yogas FAQ.
Are there any other traditions that show awareness of kundalini?
If you believe that kundalini is at the basis of spiritual progress
then every valid spiritual tradition must have some awareness of kundalini.
Christianity (especially Quakerism and Pentecostalism), Sufism, Qabalistic
mysticism, alchemy and magick all have literature which demonstrates some
awareness of the kundalini process but these traditions are not, to this
author's awareness, so open in their exposition of the techniques and so
it is hard to judge the depth of understanding latent in these traditions.
Nevertheless, the imagery is so unmistakable in these traditions that each
must have, at least at one time, been conversant with the movement of kundalini.
Indirectly kundalini can be awakened by devotion, by selfless service,
or by intellectual enquiry. In these paths the blocks to the awakening
of kundalini are slowly removed. Occasionally, individuals on these paths
will experience a sudden awakening of kundalini but generally because the
blocks are slowly and gently removed kundalini-like experiences evolve
slowly in these paths.
Broadly speaking there are two radically different direct approaches
to awakening kundalini. One approach requires initiation by a guru and
relies upon a technique called shaktipat, or ``descent of shakti.'' It
is variously called: Siddha Mahayoga, Kundalini Mahayoga or Sahaja Yoga
(Spontaneous Yoga). These approaches are treated in the Siddha
Mahayoga FAQ.
The other approach uses intentional yogic techniques
. The styles using intentional techniques include Mantra Yoga, Hatha Yoga,
Laya Yoga or Kriya Yoga. These approaches are treated in the Kundalini
Yogas FAQ .
Fundamentally the approach of Siddha Mahayoga and the Kundalini Yogas
are different. In Siddha Mahayoga the guru awakens the kundalini and after
that the core of the practice is the inactive and non-willful surrender
to kundalini. In Kundalini Yogas the will is used to awaken the kundalini
and to guide its progress. Clearly these are different approaches. Nevertheless,
elements of the each approach occur in the practices of the other. Siddha
Mahayogins may use asanas, pranayamas and other hatha yoga practices. On
the other hand gurus in Kundalini Yoga may give infusions of shakti to
their students to help them at particular points in their practice.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using effort, in kundalini
yogas, as opposed to the grace of the guru, in siddha mahayoga, to awaken
kundalini?
Since every practitioner brings his own unique inclinations and obstacles
to the practice of yoga it is very hard to generalize on this point. In
terms of actually awakening kundalini gurus of Siddha Mahayoga claim that
the kundalini is more easily and reliably awakened by the grace of the
guru than by individual effort. In my limited experience I would agree.
with this assertion. While not every long-term student of either practice
necessarily shows signs of kundalini awakening it is amazing how many people
have had instant awakenings of kundalini through initiation from siddha
gurus.
In terms of encountering difficulties along the path the siddha gurus
would also claim that fewer problems due to kundalini awakening, such as
mental imbalance, are encountered by students of Siddha Mahayoga. Here
I think the results are mixed. It seems to me that the guidance of the
teacher in either Siddha Mahayoga or Kundalini Yoga is more a determining
factor than which style of kundalini practice is employed.
Generally speaking each style of practice has its strengths and weakness.
The strength of Siddha Mahayoga is the ease with which it awakens the kundalini.
The weakness is that because the kundalini is so easily awakened by the
guru students of Siddha Mahayoga often have completely undisciplined personal
meditation practices. Time is spent instead to trying to recreate some
of their initial experiences by following the guru around hoping for his
or her grace Some people spend 20 or more years in this manner without
ever developing an inner core of practice or experience.
The strength of the family of Kundalini Yogas is that the progress
is at least apparently more under the control of the student of the yoga.
These students seem more likely to have disciplined personal practices
and more of an understanding of how the practice relates to their own experience.
Unfortunately for some students this leads to a fairly egotistical approach
to their practice and ultimately the kundalini energy is used to bolster
the ego rather than to merge the ego in bliss.
Briefly, according to classical literature the signs of an awakened
kundalini can be grouped into: mental signs, vocal signs and physical signs.
Mental signs can include visions that range from ecstatically blissful
to terrifyingly frightful. Vocal signs can include spontaneous vocal expressions
that range from singing or reciting mantras to make various animals sounds
such as growling or chirping. Physical signs include trembling, shaking
and spontaneously performing hatha yoga postures and pranayamas.
From a more subjective perspective the more pleasant experiences associated
with a kundalini awakening may include: waves of bliss, periods of elation,
glimpses of transcendental consciousness. The less pleasant experiences
associated with a kundalini awakening may include: trembling, sharp aches
in areas associated with the cakras, periods of irrational anxiety, sudden
flashes of heat.
Are these methods of awakening kundalini dangerous? What about Gopi
Krishna's books?
If we take the psychological perspective and view kundalini as the
power latent in our unconscious then it is easy to understand that awakening
this force is going to bring a greater amount of unconscious material into
our consciousness. Even in the best of circumstances this is likely to
be uncomfortable and if an individual is barely coping with his unconscious
even under normal circumstances then awakening kundalini may push the individual
over into psychosis. This phenomenon has been documented many times.
Forceful methods of awakening kundalini pose additional dangers. Because
quite forceful methods can be used to awaken kundalini these techniques
themselves are potentially physically and mentally disruptive. An individual
named Gopi Krishna awakened his kundalini by doing unguided meditation
on his crown cakra. His life after awakening was both blessed by ecstatic
bliss and tormented by physical and mental discomfort. Eventually his experience
stabilized. He wrote down his experiences in a recently re-released autbiography
entitled ``Living with Kundalini.'' Gopi Krishna's autobiography appears
to be an honest representation of his experiences but it is only one extreme
datapoint in the panorama of experience on kundalini yoga. It represents
dangers in forceful unguided practice but it is not representative of a
typical practicioner's experience.
But even if kundalini is dangerous, isn't it a faster way to enlighenment?
First of all it may be useful to observe that there is no technique
currently known on earth that appears to be rapidly catapulting large number
of individuals toward enlightenment. Because kundalini yogas deal so directly
with a powerful enlightening force it seems natural that they would be
``faster'', but there appears to be alot of tortoise and hare phenomena
at work with newbie kundalini yogins. Many people begin kundalini yogas,
have strong initial experiences and then become frightened. Many who perservere
through this initial phase become distracted by the energy and focus on
temporal and phenomenal applications of the energy.
There have been many scandals among kundalini yoga teachers - particularly
sexual scandals. Is there a correlation between sexual scandals and kundalini
yoga practice?
There have been scandals regarding the teachers of many paths, both
spiritual and non-spiritual ; however, it is probably fair to say that
kundalini yogins have had more than their share. Since the first publication
of these frequently-asked-questions in 1994 more than one well-known kundalini
yoga teacher has been implicated in having clandestine affairs with students
and has been asked to step down from his position as spiritual leader as
a result.
An advanced kundalini yogin is typically a powerful charismatic individual
who has the ability to directly influence the minds of others. Westerners
often mistake this power as a sign of enlightenment and allow such teachers
liberties as a result.
In addition it is quite common for kundalini yoga to temporarily accentuate
the sex drive. This period requires extra discipline. Finally, kundalini
yoga is closely associated with tantrism and sex is often used in conjunction
with tantric practice. Where sex is used there is of course the opportunity
for misuse or abuse.
If my kundalini is awakened will I need to change my lifestyle?
It's hard to have your cake and eat it too. If you awaken kundalini
in order to change and enrich your life it's reasonable to expect you may
need to change your lifestyle as a result. The recommendations of both
classical literature and experience is that sleep and diet will need to
be moderated otherwise severe discomfort may arise. Furthermore without
moderating sexual activity and physical work it will be hard to experience
much success with kundalini. The extent that these elements of your life
need to change depends on the nature of the individual. While genuine mental
imbalances arising from kundalini are rare nearly every kundalini yogin
will find periods when one needs to be especially sensitive to needs for
sleep, quiet and diet.
Here are some references for further reading. They may not be the easiest
books to find but they are currently in print and are very good in their
categories. Note that by definition no reputable book on kundalini will
tell you how to awaken your kundalini. Either by effort or by shaktipat
initiation, practicing kundalini yoga requires the instruction of an experienced
teacher. Some introductory practices for cleansing the channels can be
learned from books.
The author grants the right to copy and distribute this file,
provided it remains unmodified and original authorship and copyright is
retained. Adding tasteful artwork is encouraged. Please do not change the
title (in html) of this document. The author retains both the right and
intention to modify and extend this document.
Good introductory survey:
White, John (Editor) (1990). Kundalini - Evolution and Enlightenment.
New York: Paragon House.
Classical Works:
Svatmarama (1985). The Hatha Yoga Pradipika (Swami Muktibodhananda
Saraswati, Trans.). (First ed.). Munger, Bihar: Bihar School of Yoga.
Silburn, L. (1988). Kundalini - Energy of the Depths (Jacques Gontier,
Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Contemporary Kundalini Yogins:
Chetanananda, S. (1991). Dynamic Stillness. Cambridge, Massachusetts:
Rudra Press.
Muktananda, Swami (1989b). From the Finite to the Infinite (First ed.).
Volumes I &II, South Fallsburg, NY: Siddha Yoga Dham of America Foundation.
Some caution is recommended when dealing with Kundalini. Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the K-list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list.
All posts publically archived with the permission of the people involved.
Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited.
Footer img by Sharon Webb. Cadeucus anim from www.gifworks.com
Design and graphics by the List Mystress, maintenance by Team K.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/kurt/kundalini-faq.html