To: K-list
Recieved: 2003/04/18 02:34
Subject: Re: [K-list] re: evil
From: hbrost
On 2003/04/18 02:34, hbrost posted thus to the K-list:
>>We, as human beings, cannot
>>"create" more than what already exists.
>
>I would very much doubt that my laptop existed before a human
>"created" it. :)
>
>Hety: Well, I will have to differ with you. What is the laptop
>made of?
It is a concrete form that resulted from several decades of advances
in engineering.
Hety: BUT, ....WHERE did it come from Danijel??? You're saying that human
beings created the atoms and then the molecules that made the laptop?
"Engineering" is only thought, upon thought...so actually, yes, human beings
did 'create' the laptop, but they didn't create the materials from which
it's made. My opinion is that the thought of a laptop was always there, so
did we create it, or is it Memorex?
>First, an idea. Then take it from there...what already exists in
>and on this Earthly plane. And from where does thought come? ;-)
>I believe that all thoughts already exist. Just given a different
>"spin?"
I once had an argument with someone who tried to convince me of the
same thing. I replied that I don't believe that Jesus could program
in Pascal better than I can. Even in such an obvious example, he
didn't agree with me, and argued that all the things existed since
forever in an abstract and unmanifested form, and that Jesus, being
all-knowing, must have been able to write in Pascal, too. I laughed.
:)
Hety: I hope you are a carpenter too! Oh, Danijel! How ludicrous! If
Jesus lived today, he'd operate the Fish Market off of South Street? He'd
program, geez, not in Pacal...he'd be far more up to date than that! ;-)
_____________________
For you see, I don't think that even God knows what will come out of
things, in the end. I think that the entire point of Creation is
surprise, not foreknowledge. The laptop I write this on is a surprise
- - even 50 years ago, nobody could have predicted it, and in fact,
nobody has - not in this form, anyway. 50 years ago, nobody could
predict the boom of the mobile phones, nobody could have known that
today, at least in Croatia, probably 90% of kids in schools will have
GSM devices and that they will constantly send the SMS messages.
Hety: Time, IMO, has already happened. The past is NOW. The future is NOW.
We have such a limited capacity to even speculate! You see, "God/dess" has
this version all on a CD. Y'know...like a video game for a child? You can
play and play and play...with the settings on "difficult" and see if you can
beat the CD. You can't! Because every move you make (every breath you
take) is ON that CD.
___________________
They
predicted the flying cars, intelligent computers, flight to Mars
etc., but those things never happened. In fact, the very things
_nobody_ could think of, did happen. Even Gentry Lee, from the JPL,
whose engineers invented most of the technology we use today, could
not predict the future of technology even one decade ahead. I've read
lots of good science fiction, so I know. Nobody predicted anything
with accuracy. So, I really don't think that the future is all
planned, I think it's totally uncertain, open and full of surprises.
Hety: So YOU know. Great! Mere humans could NOT predict the future. Gee.
I can't believe it.
>>second-by-second basis. But choose to focus on them,
>>well...doesn't that take your energy away from Love, as Jason
>>points out?
>
>>If you observe evil and you help, did it take your energy away from
>>love, or did you manifest love? If you ignore evil and fail to
>>help, did you in fact love, or did you manifest indifference?
>
>Hety: That's not the point of what I questioned.
That is exactly the point of what you questioned; however, you seem
not to like it. :)
Hety: No, it's not the point I questioned. You snipped too soon, or not
enough.
___________________
In order to solve a problem, one must first
observe its existence. If you ignore to see the hungry people, you
sure aren't going to do anything to feed them, are you? If you don't
observe a husband beating up his wife every day, you sure aren't
going to help her, are you?
___________________
Hety: The problem goes deeper than helping or observing and then even
having a desire to do something about it. The 'problem' is an underlying
Belief that allows the problem to occur in the first place.
>>>And what you need to hide from, rules you.
>>
>>Hety: No, not necessarily. Doubt Jason is hiding from anything.
>>Was Jesus hiding from what was "ruling" Him? He was a human being.
>
>>I don't see where Jesus negated the existence of evil. In fact, I
>>can remember at least 20 places where he attacked it bitterly.
>
>Hety: That's not the point. Jesus certainly did _not_ negate evil
Why, then, did you use the example of Jesus, when it serves to
illustrate my point, and not yours?
_____________________
Hety: Ahhh, Danijel. I thought we were talking about something else!! Not
just what you snipped. Jesus certainly was not ruled by evil. Jesus
acknowledged evil -- in Himself -- and overcame it. He did not deny it. He
was not ruled by anything, including His Father. He had free will as much
as we do.
_____________________
>, but
>then we would need to interpret the interpretations of the
>interpretations of what Jesus really did or did not do.
<snip>
>>Hety: Ahemmmmm.....the VATICAN? ...... Just checking!
>
>Yup, Vatican. They do elect the Pope, you know, and he is the head
>of state. A very important state.
>
>Hety: Again...THE VATICAN? ;-)
What do you, exactly, object Vatican? Name a state with higher
spiritual and moral standards and less crime per capita. Name a state
with better social care. Name a state with less poor and homeless
people. Name a state with a more respectable leadership.
Hety: I guess we won't go there. Has nothing to do with Kundalini and has
everything to do with history from Constantine forward. However, my
personal opinion is that the Pope knows nothing about what most people on
this List know. Has nothing to do with social economics and everything to
do with politics, or at least what he's told to do.
>>While I stated that All Things exist, isn't it possible that this
>>thing we call the Ego is trying to triumph over God/dess and
>>attempting to reign supreme?
>
>In some cases, yes. In other cases, ego might explore ways in which
>to love God.
>
>Hety: How? When?
Yogananda, Vivekananda, Lahiri Mahasaya, Yuktesvar, Jesus, Milarepa,
Caitanya, Sankaracarya, Ramanuja, St. Theresa of Avilla, St. John of
the Cross, all the angels of the higher planes of existence...
What do you think, that they were without ego? They all had it, but
theirs was satcitanandamaya, made of the Divine qualities.
Hety: No, I don't believe they were without ego. However, they intimately
knew their Source, where the ego is not welcome, or perhaps, is not a part,
since it it a human creation. I'm sure, as humans, they acknowledged their
egos. But in my definition of the word ego, their egos wanted nothing to do
with their Eternal lives, so therefore, their egos wanted nothing to do with
the ways in which to love God.
Love to you, if you choose,
Hety
To get a reminder of your password or adjust your subscription, visit:
http://kundalini-gateway.org/mailman/listinfo/k-list_kundalini-gateway.org
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.