To: K-list
Recieved: 2000/06/12 14:31
Subject: Re: [K-list] stifled
From: David Bozzi
On 2000/06/12 14:31, David Bozzi posted thus to the K-list:
ckressATnospamaol.com wrote:
> To me, spiritual growth isn't a matter of throwing things out but of
> discovering the interconnectedness and relative value of everything.
In a literal sense we don't get rid of anything. The blocks and beliefs that
slice and dice are seen to be unreal. They never were.
> Check under your bed, David. The monster is still there, awaiting an invitation
> to venture into the light of awareness and be integrated into your life.
I did not get rid of anything. True. It was never there to be gotten rid of.
(see poem and enjoy: http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Coffeehouse/3908/monsters.htm) : )
> Yes, it can be seen as selfish to need someone... and it can be seen as
> selfish to need no one. Depends on your vantage point.
Love can be seen to be evil...
> David wrote:
>
> << But growth does not end with the personal.
> There is a deeper understanding and experience that reveals we are
> everyone.>>
>
> This is a confusion of oneness and unity through diversity. At the level
> where there is a "we" there is multiplicity and individual uniqueness.
I use the pronoun 'we' not in the sense of multiplicity. It's difficult to
describe what I refer to with words, but I use 'we' because it suggests total
inclusiveness. I do not use the word in the traditional sense that perpetuates 'different'
beings.
> We have basic similarities but we aren't everyone!
Depends who we are.
> David wrote: "For some, what you refer to as a 'lifetime' is but the blink of
> an I."
>
> Okay, let's get real here.
Whose reality channel are we watching?
> If you're eighty or ninety years old, or dying
> from a terminal illness, your lifetime probably does seem like the blink of
> an eye/I.
Are you absolutely certain? Can you testify to the experience of all of us?
Is this the only circumstance when timelessness can be experienced?
> Otherwise, it's a philosophical abstraction which seems to me
I can see how one can perceive what I refer to as an abstraction.
We do this all our lives.
> like a cheap shot way to dismiss Isadora's high regard for a devoted long term
> love relationship.
Nothing was dismissed.
> "Need" has become a pejorative way of saying "natural
> interdependence".
I have been referring to the confusion of our own identity.
Nothing more.
> David wrote: "Neediness is fear."
>
> But kittens are neediness
> incarnate. Is their neediness fear-based and unacceptable too?
The illusion of fear can only be seen as illusion once it is embraced.
> Or say it's your own elderly, sick, disabled mother.
> Gonna tell her to evolve past her neediness into an unlimited understanding
> like yours?
I could do far worse. I could cater to illusion.
> Or do you put aside your ideals and help her out?
: )
> Who said anything about filling infinite holes?
This is the psychology of neediness.
> Why does any one aspect of life have
> to fulfill your every longing to be precious and complete in itself?
Ask the Neediness that.
> And what's wrong with having unfilled holes? Why the urgency to plug yourself
> up?
Again, ask your Neediness...
> Isadora wrote:
>
> <<> I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing. If it didn't work, we
> > wouldn't have 6 billion people on the planet. Maybe it works a little too
> > well! : D>>
>
> David wrote: "The human species is indeed in need of either enlightenment or a
> predator."
>
> Love or acceptance not a viable option, eh?
Love your hardness and take your bitterness out for a walk. Cradle it like
a tender newborn and you may find your anger has grown into something beautiful.
> Change/convert or feed 'em to the lions! Sounds like the rally cry for the
> Inquisition.
Does it? Or are you reacting? This is not a new pattern is it...
> Geez, when we take a vote to elect a new Ruler of the universe,
> I ain't casting mine for YOU, that's for sure.
I wouldn't vote for a promiscuous man either.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
com/1/4935/5/_/680797/_/960845218/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k2000/k20a03013.html
|