To: K-list
Recieved: 2000/03/24 01:18
Subject: Re: [K-list]Osho.. and the application of criticism
From: Danijel Turina
On 2000/03/24 01:18, Danijel Turina posted thus to the K-list:
From: Danijel Turina <dturinaATnospamiskon.hr>
At 14:54 2000.03.23 -0800, you wrote:
>From: Mystress Angelique Serpent <serpentATnospamdomin8rex.com>
>>:))
>>I didn't attack anyone, I just said how I see some things, that's all. Calm
>>down, you're exaggerating with your aggression-defense attitude.
> ah.. you see purity, right?
Except when a fly lands in the soup. :)
>>>>Well, I had no other options, since you were wrong in everything
>>> Yes, you always think so.. :)
>>
>>No, you were always right and I was always wrong. Happy?
> Ooooooo.. very sexy.. keep that up and I'll be trying to enslave
>you, again..;)
Yeah, and I'll try to bite your head off, then... <yawn> I have a better
idea, let's leave Druid and Romana to play chess or Warcraft, and we'll go
have some ice cream? ;)
>>>> except the
>>>>fact that I overworked myself and that I need a vacation badly,
>>> Yes. :) But you like flaming me, better than sleep..:) A change is
>>>as good as a rest, they say..:)
>>
>>Flaming you takes less effort than sleeping, and it's more natural. ;)))
> ROTFLOL!!.. that's a good one.. :) I'm glad you are feeling
>refreshed..
:) The work eased up signifficantly, so I managed to recover.
>>But I'm not really flaming you, I'm as calm as an iceberg. Titanics can
>>sink themselves on me, I won't get moved much. :)
> Good!! I felt the blast of hot air from the last post, tho.. whuff..
>prickly coming off my monitor.. but I went into witness and out the other
>side into amusement. This one made me LOL and applaud. :) You must have
>gotten some sleep. Good!
Wow, see how well I've trained you, a year ago you'd search me out with a
chainsaw. :))
>>>>But I'm long
>>>>past the phase when I tried to prove you wrong all the time. I accepted
the
>>>>fact that you will never understand me, and when I did that, I lost the
>>>>need to persuade you and explain things.
>>> Then why do you still do it?
>>
>>Do what, persuade you? Naah, I lost too much nerves doing that, now I'm
>>just talking to you. The fact that we disagree is normal. ;)
> If we agreed on everything, there would be no conversation.
Yup, and the list was so damn quiet when I subscribed, that I thought that
maybe there was a subscription error somewhere. ;)
>We'd be
>left talking about ice cream. Speaking of which, I just ate an ice cream
>O-Henry bar, for breakfast, and was it ever yummy!! Almost as good as
>Haagen Daz caramel, my new favorite flavor.
Drooool....
>>You are, you even see it when there isn't any. It's just that it has to
>>belong to someone else, because you're Goddess. :)
> Ah so.. me violent.. crazy whip wielding psycho bitch Goddess with
>an attitude.. Dark Kali, I guess.. or maybe the Morrigan. There is a spell
>to invoke the Morrigan, it begins, "Gather 9 severed heads".. she was a
>Celtic Goddess of war.
Mmm, sounds like you alright. :)
> Anyhow, you are the one who was suggesting I murder the impostor.. :)
Sure, why not, it was such an extreme suggestion that you got a sudden
attack of simpathy and unconditional acceptance. :))
>I
>was surprised, altho I shouldn't be.. crazy Croation berserker.. I'm glad
>you are feeling more relaxed, today.. :)
:)))
>>You said that everything is Goddess, so I have to say that it isn't,
>>because otherwise we would agree, and there would be no conversation. :)
> *applause!*
Thankyou, thankyou! <bowing to the audience, and falling straight on my face>
>>>>I would really like Sai Baba to be present here and be able to speak for
>>>>himself. Then I would flame his ass off.
>>> ROTFLOL!! Well, he's not here, but I guess I'll do??
>>
>>Naah, he'd be much more tasty, like a ripe piece of fruit to be knocked
>>down with a rock. :)
> What do ya mean, I'm not tasty? <pout>
We already agreed that I'll have _you_ for lunch. :)) Not as a dish,
unfortunately, but one can't have everything. ;)
> Well, if you have his email address, I'll add him to the list..;P
I'd bet on swamiATnospamsathyasai.org or bhagavanATnospamsathyasai.org, but since he once
said that there was no God on the Internet, I guess he'd ruin his
reputation as an avatar if he joined. :))
>>In order for them to feel no difference between having and not having it.
>>It's not about money changing the owner, it's about the owner rejecting the
>>idea of ownership.
> Well, if they give it to him, they have the experience of having it
>then not having it, and they get to experience the joy of giving, too.. :)
Yes, they have a feeling that it's an important thing to give, and that it
therefore has value. It increases their material attachments, because they
want to have more money to give.
>>:)) Aaaah, I'm being dragged down, glogloglobllllfff...... <drown> ;)
> Sigh.. guess I'd better bail you out, again....
By stepping all over my head in high heels, as usual? ;)
>>>>As I said, I'll wait for you to come back and tell me about it. :)
>>> I will.. :) Blessings!!
>>
>>I think I'll start the bets, about whether you'll still argue with me after
>>you see me in RL. :))
> Well, I hardly ever argue with people in R/L.. it's much more fun to
>argue over email, coz they cannot interrupt.. :) :)
Good! Does it mean that you'll be a good girl and shut up while I make you
tea? ;)
-----
Homepage: http://danijel.cjb.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/937/3/_/680797/_/953886217/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.