To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/12/03 15:36
Subject: [K-list] Fwd: Using God's name in vain
From: Mystress Angelique Serpent
On 1999/12/03 15:36, Mystress Angelique Serpent posted thus to the K-list:
>From: owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
>Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 18:04:02 -0700 (MST)
>To: owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
>Subject: BOUNCE kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net: Admin request of type
/\buns\w*b/i at line 7
>
>>From K-listATnospamdomin8rex.com Thu Dec 2 18:04:00 1999
>Received: from imo17.mx.aol.com (imo17.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.7]) by
salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id SAA17969; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 18:03:59 -0700 (MST)
>From: KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
>Received: from KungaJigmeATnospamaol.com
>Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 20:03:30 EST
>Subject: Using God's name in vain
>To: kundaliniATnospamlist-server.net
>
>
>
>X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 45
>
>Hello all,
>
>My grounding in the Judeo/Christian (and, as some would add, Masonic)
>tradition is not that strong. Please forgive me if I have this all wrong.
I
>welcome correction.
>
>As I understand it, the unspeakable name of God is not the word "GOD." The
>English letters: G-O-D do not comprise the tetragrammaton. Indeed, if
>anything, God is a speakable name of God; a referent rather than a proper
>name.
>
>Now, I am not a Judeo/Christian/Mason. I do not hold, nor does my religion
>address, a notion of a creator deity. I do however have to reference that
>concept in conversation with those that hold it. It has been my
>understanding that it was acceptable to do so by using the word God; using a
>capital "G" to denote personification as opposed to class, ie: gods.
>
>So, to speak of "God" is to frame the conversation in a conceptual tone. It
>is not using any name. It is not taking any name in vain. I hope I do not
>need to add, but will anyway, that I do not speak here of outright profane
>usage by those far with no greater knowledge with which to express their
rage.
>
>I post this sincerely, wondering how I, who have no similar concept, would
>dialogue with someone who holds a concept of a creator deity if my very
>reference to such deity would taking "his name in vain."
>
>Sarva Mangalam!
>~James
>
Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini
mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the symbol.
All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b03350.html
|