Kundalini Gateway Email List Archives

line

To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/11/20 17:15
Subject: Re: [K-list] sex juice (was: heavy sai... follow up)
From: Steve Salter


On 1999/11/20 17:15, Steve Salter posted thus to the K-list:

percyval wrote:

> WARNING: this post contains a frank discussion of male sexuality and tantra,
> so stop here and delete if you might find this offensive...
>

I paused and then realized I hadn't been offended by anything for so long it was
worth perusing!

>

> stimulation and ejaculationless orgasms, that if i finally ejaculate, there
> is only a very small amount of semen...if i merely abstained from
> stimulation without the tantra, i would build up a very large quantity of
> semen after a week's time...so where did it all go? i think that the tantric
> stimulation got it physically moving up my spine to my brain, although this
> is not the only possible explanation...
>

Last I checked there weren't any such structures as spinal vas deferens. Since
semen is reabsorbed into the body I would hazard a wild hypothesis that the
increased energy you are generating through tantric practices is increasing the
absorption rate.

>
> compare to my previous norm of having about one a day...but for me, it is
> the combination of withholding the ejacualation along with extended orgasms
> (often longer than 30 minutes*) that makes the magic...
>

Yeah, that always works for me. I like to run it up to an hour or two, if
possible, before releasing.

An alternate is to not worry about holding back but allow orgasms to happen as
they will and just continue, back to back orgasms as it were. As you become
drained and your body becomes exhausted a certain mental "place" can be attained
thus creating an orgasmic state that goes on and on without physical release.
(since physical release becomes a near impossiblity after five or six times in a
row.)

I prefer the former, easier on the heart.

> i'm right-handed, but get a lot less tired by occasionally switching off to
> my left... so, i guess that means that i'm "ambisextrous"...*grin*
>

Ummmm, you are talking about masturbation here? Hmmm, didn't read carefully
enough I guess.

I suppose the techniques would work that way also.

-Steve.

blank
DISCLAIMER!

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
blank
K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
line
  • Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
  • All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the at symbol symbol.
  • All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
  • This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
  • URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b02865.html