To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/11/16 13:12
Subject: Re: [K-list] deities
From: Smilingjaguar
On 1999/11/16 13:12, Smilingjaguar posted thus to the K-list:
> Course, I be da judge, after all. the current god had to take a lunch
break
> and
> left me in charge. I knew I shoulda stayed far away from there. I just
> finished
> up with some guy who was pleading not guilty of jaywalking 'cross the
golden
> cobblestones of Paradise Avenue in Heaven. He claimed he heard "one hand
> clapping" and being bemused, accidentally wandered across. I said "MU"
and
> set
> him to swabbing the celestial kitchen. *sigh*
Man, if I knew he was putting you there, I wouldn't have let the phone ring
when he called. *grins*
> By seeking nothing I find the All. Can you think of a better way?
You seek nothing...so you are on list list to see your own words? Everyone
is seeking something.
> Careful maam, or you'll get arraigned for contempt of court and that means
> YOU
> have to take a turn in the barrel of being da judge. It ain't a fun time,
> believe
> me.
Already ducked my term, can do it again if necessary. :)
> Oh, thought you knew. I don't care to figure out the truth of the
universe.
> I
> found that the harder I try, the farther it gets. When it is time, I will
be
> it.
But you had to look to find your version of truth, did you not? The wording
of this sentence seems to mean you have tried other things.
> Note the question mark at the end of my sentence. That gives me a loophole
> and
> you an opening. Take the shot! Oh wait, you already tried.
But I didn't tell you to prove it, did I? *shrugs and smiles*
> ummm, ok, if you say so. I think perhaps you should bypass the Court and go
> straight to the booby hatch, with all respect. It is much more fun there
> anyway.
The booby hatch? Is that the technical term?
> Ahhahh!. You missed another opportunity to blow milk out your nose.
No, that's only for really ridiculous statements like the Court of the Cosmos
thingie. I do have some level of restraint, although I abandoned it to silly
so I could deal with you on your Court of the Cosmos level. :)
> No, I may be an atheist jackass (got a problem with that?) but I never
> denied
> everything but the "physical" you and me.
Hint: I said "came across". It does not mean that's what you meant. Email
is a hard medium to get your point fully across with. And I was mentioning
that asa possible reason for disagreement. That very misunderstanding. See?
That was your hasty religious knee
> jerk
> reaction. At least it looks that way.
No, it was an honest "call em as you see em" from that and other posts.
Hence "came across"--the difference between what is understood and what is
meant.
> Really? That is a revelation when one considers your posts. I had no
> preconceived
> notions but you came across as a US Midwest bible thumper. Interesting, eh?
I have no connections to religion. Personally, I have what I believe, and
since you were being hostile, difficult, and disrespectful of others' beliefs
while trying to push your own, I decided to see what you would do should
someone do the same to you. From your response you can't take it, which is
what I thought.
> You have a limit on handling energy?
The physical body does. :) My soul, no. The current vehicle, yes in the
sense that it cannot handle the strength inherent in some entities. I know
because I've approached that threshhold. Or do you find it so wrong that
others have disagreeing experiences and knowledge? We do live in two
separate realities, remember?
Kimberly
> -Steve.
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.