Kundalini Gateway Email List Archives

line

To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/11/16 12:33
Subject: Re: [K-list] deities
From: Steve Salter


On 1999/11/16 12:33, Steve Salter posted thus to the K-list:

SmilingjaguarATnospamaol.com wrote:

> ROTFLMAO IRL You're judging what is admissable in the court of the Cosmos???

Course, I be da judge, after all. the current god had to take a lunch break and
left me in charge. I knew I shoulda stayed far away from there. I just finished
up with some guy who was pleading not guilty of jaywalking 'cross the golden
cobblestones of Paradise Avenue in Heaven. He claimed he heard "one hand
clapping" and being bemused, accidentally wandered across. I said "MU" and set
him to swabbing the celestial kitchen. *sigh*

>
> *trying not to send her milk through her nose* Hint: It's the COSMOS. Try
> again, but thanks for the laugh...
>

Not this court, maam. We accept just the facts, maam. We also ran outta capital
letters and only use a "C" for traditions sake.

>
> I *don't* try to convince others. Have you seen me speak of my visions on
> this list? No. To tell the truth I don't give a rat's ass about proving
>

Didn't really say "you" personally did, did I? I just said that "I" wouldn't.

> anything to anyone. You are the one who seeks proof, but yet you say you
> seek nothing.

By seeking nothing I find the All. Can you think of a better way?

> Be honest with yourself about that which you seek or you will
> never find it.

That is a truism if I have ever heard one.

> it can't be measures with your five physical senses it is inadmissable to the
> court of the Cosmos *really trying not to start laughing again. Didn't
> work.....ROTLOL*
>

Careful maam, or you'll get arraigned for contempt of court and that means YOU
have to take a turn in the barrel of being da judge. It ain't a fun time, believe
me.

>
> LOL...that's something we're all here to figure out.
>

Oh, thought you knew. I don't care to figure out the truth of the universe. I
found that the harder I try, the farther it gets. When it is time, I will be it.

> clear enough, sorry. We are individuals but we are also One, are we not?

> If I wanted to be an ass right now I'd tell you to prove it. No subjective

Note the question mark at the end of my sentence. That gives me a loophole and
you an opening. Take the shot! Oh wait, you already tried.

> > can't prove that but it feels good so I go with it.
>
> But you can't think that way, and neither can anyone else, because you made
> such thoughts inadmissable to the Court of the Cosmos, remember? ;0) Don't
> you hate it when you hang yourself like that???? *grinning*
>

Ummm, nowhere is it written (or did I say) that you can't think any way you like.
I think you got the court confused with the TP (thought police). Might be good
not to misquote lest ye be sentenced to another earth term.

>
> But whether they are empty or not will always be a matter of perception, and
> inadmissable as well, since it is so subjective. *giggling*
>

ummm, ok, if you say so. I think perhaps you should bypass the Court and go
straight to the booby hatch, with all respect. It is much more fun there anyway.

>
> *laughs* We agree on something? Woohoo! :0)
>

Ahhahh!. You missed another opportunity to blow milk out your nose.

>
> I dunno...probably because you came across as an atheistic jackass in your
> last post who denied anything but physical you and me. :0) I think that's
>

No, I may be an atheist jackass (got a problem with that?) but I never denied
everything but the "physical" you and me. That was your hasty religious knee jerk
reaction. At least it looks that way.


> where the majority disagreement comes in. Or it could be that I have a
> strong distaste for organized religions.
>

Really? That is a revelation when one considers your posts. I had no preconceived
notions but you came across as a US Midwest bible thumper. Interesting, eh?


>
> There is a line drawn when we are physically incarnated, from my
> experience....the limited ability I've noticed to handle energy does separate
> a bit. :)

You have a limit on handling energy?

-Steve.

blank
DISCLAIMER!

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
blank
K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
line
  • Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
  • All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the at symbol symbol.
  • All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
  • This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
  • URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999b/k99b02665.html