To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/07/02 19:18
Subject: Re: [K-list] Hard Core Kundalini
From: Dale Parks
On 1999/07/02 19:18, Dale Parks posted thus to the K-list:
Nothing strikes negative here!!
But believe this should have been the
positive in first post, so had to address
that one the way I did!!
Eventually we will all be fully realized,
but it`s a wonderful thing to be aware
of, a part of, evolutionary gains that
can be made in this lifetime!!
I wish you well,
D_
Received: from mailsorter-102-1.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.98) by
postoffice-261.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 2 Jul 1999
18:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net>
Received: from salmon.esosoft.net (salmon.esosoft.net [192.41.17.47]) by
mailsorter-102-1.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.graham.14Aug97)
with ESMTP id SAA27659; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 18:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (salmonATnospamlocalhost) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5)
id TAA24691; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 19:11:23 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by salmon.esosoft.net (bulk_mailer v1.9); Fri, 2 Jul 1999
19:10:25 -0600
Received: (salmonATnospamlocalhost) by salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id TAA24394; Fri,
2 Jul 1999 19:10:23 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.2]) by
salmon.esosoft.net (8.8.5) id TAA24385; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 19:10:21
-0600 (MDT)
From: CKRESSATnospamaol.com
Received: from CKRESSATnospamaol.com by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id tRNVa27388
(14379) for <KundaliniATnospamlist-server.net>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:08:42
-0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3fb3893f.24aebc99ATnospamaol.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:08:41 EDT
Subject: Re: [K-list] Hard Core Kundalini
To: KundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 13
Sender: owner-kundaliniATnospamList-Server.net
Reply-To: CKRESSATnospamaol.com
There are so many levels and subtleties to awareness that something which
resonates with great validity for some may seem contradicted by the
experiences of others. Colette spoke of Kundalini "severing attachment to
the body in favour of the Spirit," which may well be the lesson her illness
was intended to teach her. Yet at other levels of development (not higher or
lower, just different views through the prism), Kundalini can integrate body
and spirit, healing the separation between the two. From this perspective,
rather than conceiving of the body as an opposition to Spirit (or an
imprisonment of the soul), the body is experienced as both messenger and
living presence of Spirit. I have come to a more profound awareness of this
through my experiences of being animated and danced (literally as well as
figuratively) by Kundalini-Ma.
On the other hand, being able to say "adios" to the body when things get too
painful on a physical level sounds like a neat trick. I wish I could do it
on command! (I've tried, believe me, through meditation, visualizations,
self-hypnosis, etc.) But if I could do it, I'd probably never be here at
all! With chronic pain in the body, if I could escape it, I'd be long gone!
I think Colette is also speaking of the ability to detach, which is an
advanced spiritual discipline which I have yet to learn. Or perhaps my path
this time around doesn't allow me that option. We're not all here to learn
the same things in a single lifetime.
It may also be, as Colette says, that the deepest opening of the heart cannot
occur until Kundalini clears the heart chakra. But not everyone with
awakened Kundalini finds their way to their heart center since the clearing
of the chakras can take many lifetimes. Conversely, simply living from the
heart can itself awaken Kundalini. And there are many people whose Kundalini
seems dormant, yet who live beautiful and exemplary lives from the light of
their hearts. It's all so mysterious.
El
DISCLAIMER!
Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
K. List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
symbol.